Students

ANTH307 – Culture Myth and Symbolism

2014 – S1 Day

General Information

Download as PDF
Unit convenor and teaching staff Unit convenor and teaching staff Unit Convenor
Deborah Van Heekeren
Contact via deborah.vanheekeren@mq.edu.au
Credit points Credit points
3
Prerequisites Prerequisites
39cp or admission to GDipArts
Corequisites Corequisites
Co-badged status Co-badged status
Unit description Unit description
Individually and collectively people make their lives meaningful through practices of symbolic representation. During the twentieth century anthropologists concerned with the study of culture came to focus on systems of symbols and meaning. Psychoanalysis and linguistics were important early influences on symbolic anthropology because they identified the capacity of the human mind to operate according to symbolic processes, but these theories also proved too universalist in their claims for anthropology's cross-cultural evidence. The 1980s saw a marked shift in anthropological approaches. Taking the anthropology of religion as its focus this unit examines key theorists and ethnographic studies in the field of symbolic anthropology and phenomenology. We discover that the study of culture shows that human consciousness includes a non-rational or affective aspect sometimes described as 'mystical' or mythic. Mythic consciousness is also explored in this unit as a distinct form of consciousness that should not be seen as false, inferior or irrational. We therefore consider the way phenomena such as dreams, spirits, magic, and emotions figure importantly in anthropological analysis.

Important Academic Dates

Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates

Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project
  • Understand key themes, theories and issues in the anthropology of myth and symbolic anthropology
  • Participate in group discussion and formulate discussion questions relevant to the themes of the unit

Assessment Tasks

Name Weighting Due
1 15% ongoing
2 20% Week 6
3 40% Week 10
4 25% Week 14

1

Due: ongoing
Weighting: 15%

 

Tutorial attendance is compulsory and your level of participation will also be assessed. Each week all students are expected to have done the required readings and be ready to discuss them (and to link this to the lecture). Your preparation should include the formulation of at least one discussion question each week.

 


On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Participate in group discussion and formulate discussion questions relevant to the themes of the unit

2

Due: Week 6
Weighting: 20%

 

From weeks 2 to 5 you will be set a series of small tasks, the results of which are to be written up and contextualized in the course readings we have covered so far in a short paper (min 1000 words). Further details for this assignment will be provided in tutorials.

 


On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project

3

Due: Week 10
Weighting: 40%

 

The essay topics will be distributed during the early part of the semester. These will focus on the various theoretical perspectives presented in readings and lectures whilst allowing you to investigate a particular area of interest.  The further readings listed for each topic and the lecture references each week should provide the basis for this essay.

 


On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project

4

Due: Week 14
Weighting: 25%

The exam will consist of short essay questions and will cover the films, lectures and tutorial readings in the course.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project

Delivery and Resources

This unit uses ilearn and ilecture

Unit Schedule

 

 

 

Lecture and Tutorial Guide

 

 

Week 1: Mar 7

 

 

Lecture:  Introduction (course overview): How is ‘culture’ related to the symbolic, to myths and to dreams? Why are some cultures said to have history and others only myths and what is the social and political significance of such dichotomies? Where do myths come from? These are some of the things we will begin to think about this week. Don’t miss this important first lecture.

 

No tutorial this week but you should read the course outline thoroughly, familiarise yourself with the course assignments and make a start on the readings for next week. If you have any questions please bring them to next week’s tutorial.

 

 

Week 2: Mar 14  

 

Lecture:  The symbolic society

 

The concepts ‘culture’ and ‘society’ have shaped the way human groups are thought about, analysed, and classified. Historically they defined two different approaches to anthropology. This week we focus on the influence of the French sociologist Emile Durkheim’s theories of society which greatly influenced British social anthropology. We begin our exploration of the symbolic with a consideration of his work on religion and society

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Wagner, R. 1981 The assumption of culture  (Ch1) In The Invention of Culture. pp1-16. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Durkheim, E. 1979 The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. In  W. A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt (eds), Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological approach. 4th Ed. pp. 27-35. NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

 

Further reading;

 

Charlesworth, M.  1997  The Invention of Australian Aboriginal Religion (Ch 2). In Religious Inventions,  pp51-79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Morris, B.  1987  Anthropological Studies of Religion, pp111-131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Week 3: Mar 21

 

Lecture:  From social structure to ritual process

 

The most fundamental of social categories according to Durkheim were the ‘sacred’ and the ‘profane’. We will consider the usefulness of the distinction as we move into the area of ritual. Victor Turner’s important writing on ritual and symbol which will be the focus in Week 4 was influenced by Durkheim but it was also shaped by other intellectual trends, most particularly by Arnold Van Gennep’s Rites of Passage.

 

Film  Flowers for Guadalupe

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Goody, J. 2010  Religion and Ritual from Tylor to Parsons: the definitional problem.  In Myth, Ritual and the Oral, Ch 1, pp13-40, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Wolf, E. 1979  The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican National Symbol. In W. A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt (eds), Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological approach. 4th Ed. pp. 112-115, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.

 

Further reading;

 

Wolf, E.  2007 [1964] Santa Claus: Notes on a Collective Representation. In R. A. Manners (ed), Process and Pattern in Culture, pp 147-155, New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.

 

Belk, Russell W. 2000  Materialism and the Modern U.S. Christmas, Advertising and Society Review, Vol 1(1) online version 5/01/2011.

 

Morinis, A. (ed) 1992 Introduction; The Territory of the Anthropology of Pilgrimage, pp 1-28, Sacred Journeys: The Anthropology of Pilgrimage, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Pres

 

Turner, V. and E. Turner 1978 Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture: Anthropological Perspectives, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (especially Ch 2)

 

Hermkens, A. and W. Jansen and C. Notremans (eds)  2009 Moved by Mary: The Power of Pilgrimage in the Modern World, England and USA: Ashgate.

 

Geertz, Clifford 1993 [1973] (Ch 5) Ethos, World View, and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols, pp126-14, In The Interpretation of Cultures, London: Fontana Press.

 

The Australian Journal of Anthropology, [Special Issueon the Cronulla Riots] Volume 18, Issue 3, December 2007.

 

Hamilton, J. A. and Hawley, J. M.  2000 Sacred Dress, Public Worlds: Amish and Mormon experience and Commitment (Ch 3). In L. B. Arthur (ed.) Religion, Dress and the Body. pp. 31-51. Oxford and New York: Berg.

 

Week 4: Mar 28

 

Lecture:  Symbolic anthropology and the making of male and female

 

In this lecture we will revisit Wolf’s analysis of the Virgin of Guadalupe and consider it in terms of Turner’s theory of the ‘multivocality of symbols’. We will also look at pilgrimage as a ‘liminal’ experience.

 

 Anthropology’s developing interest in the symbolic revealed that much of the symbolism used in ritual was related to matters of gender. As a category of analysis ‘gender’ had previously received little attention. Studies of kinship and marriage which were important to social organisation failed to see the important differences between men’s experience and women’s experience or, more usually, took men to represent the whole of society.

 

Film Guardians of the Flutes

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Turner, V.  1970  ‘Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in rites de Passage’ (Ch IV) pp. 93-111. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

 

Lutkehaus, N. C. 1995  Gender Metaphors: Female Rituals as Cultural Models in Manam (Ch8). In N. C. Lutkehaus and P. B. Roscoe (eds.), Gender Rituals: Female Initiation in Melanesia. pp183-204. New York and London: Routledge.

Further reading;

 

Kimbali, S.T. 1969  Introduction. In Arnold Van Gennep, The Rites of Passage. pp. v-xix. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Turner, V. 1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

 

Herdt, G. 1987 The Sambia: Ritual and Gender in New Guinea, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Lutkehaus, N. C. 1995  Feminist Anthropology and Female Initiation in Melanesia (Ch1). In  N. C. Lutkehaus and P. B. Roscoe (eds.), Gender Rituals: Female Initiation in Melanesia. pp3-29. New York and London: Routledge.

 

Week 5: Apr 4

 

Lecture:  The Myth of Lévi-Strauss

 

In the next section of the course we begin to consider ‘human thought’ as it relates to culture.

 

The structuralist approach to anthropology introduced by Claude Lévi-Strauss links culture to the underlying structures of the mind. Drawing on linguistic analysis as well as the trends in symbolic anthropology and continental philosophy, Lévi-Strauss presents a theory which privileges the rational over the affective or emotional and the universal over the particular.

 

 

Film: The Kiwai Dugong Hunters of Daru

 

Required Tutorial Reading

 

Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1972  The Science of the Concrete (Ch1). In The Savage Mind, pp. 1-33. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.

 

Further reading;

 

Hénaff,  M.  1998  The Analysis of Myths (Ch7). In Claude Lévi-Strauss and the Making of Structural Anthropology. pp159-189. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

 

Forge, A. 1980 Tooth and Fang in Bali. Canberra Anthropology, Vol 3(1): 1-17.

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1973 Towards the Intellect  (Ch 4). In Totemism, pp 143-164.

Great Britain: Penguin Books

 

Geertz, C.  1993  The Cerebral Savage: On the work of Claude Levi-Strauss (Ch 13) In The Interpretation of Cultures. pp. 345-359. London: Fontana Press. (In reader for week 6

 

Malinowski, B. 1954 [1926] Myth in Primitive Psychology. In Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. pp.138-148. New York: Doubleday.

 

NB Your first assignment is due at 5pm Thursday Apr10th

 

Week 6: Apr 11

 

Clifford Geertz and the Interpretation of Culture

 

Geertz is credited with bringing together the American cultural tradition and British social anthropology. His ‘interpretive’ theory redefined the culture concept and introduced hermeneutics to ethnographic description, placing him at odds with Lévi-Strauss.

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Geertz, C.  1993  The Cerebral Savage: On the work of Claude Levi-Strauss (Ch 13) In The Interpretation of Cultures. pp. 345-359. London: Fontana Press.

 

 

 

Geertz, C. 1993 [1973] “From the Native’s Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding (Ch 3). In Local Knowledge, pp. 55-70. London: Fontana Press.

 

Further reading;

 

Geertz, C. 1988  Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author, California: Stanford University Press.

 

Clifford, J.  1986  Introduction: Partial Truths. In J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus (eds), Writing Culture. pp1-26. California: University of California Press

 

Behar, R. 1995  Introduction: Out of Exile. In R. Behar and D.A. Gordon (eds), Women Writing Culture. pp. xiv [illustration]; 1-29. California: University of California Press

 

****   12th -27th  April Recess, no lectures or tutorials  ****

 

 

Week 7: May 2

 

 

 

Lecture:  Freud: myths, dreams and creativity

 

Freud, like Lévi-Strauss (and Lévy-Bruhl who we will meet later) was, in his own way, proposing intellectual solutions for understanding questions of culture. Whether we agree with them or not Freud’s psychoanalytic theories have become so embedded in Western thought that they are part of the Western world view. This lecture will introduce the rudiments of Freud’s ideas with a view to subjecting them to cross-cultural critique. We will focus on the relationship between myths and dreams.

 

 

 

Some guiding questions; What role do symbols play in Freudian analysis?  How do they relate to culture?

 

How are the dreams of the Mekeo described by Stephen different to those described by Freud?

 

What connections can we make between dreams and myths?

 

 

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Lord, J.  2004  Mythic Giacometti, pp 3-9. New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.

 

 

Stephen, Michele 1982  ‘Dreaming is Another Power!’: The Social Significance of Dreams among the Mekeo of Papua New Guinea, Oceania, Vol. 53(2): 106-122.

NB:  Have a look at Freud’s work on dreams

 

Further reading;

 

Freud, Sigmund 1997  The Interpretation of Dreams. Great Britain: Wordsworth Editions Ltd. (or similar edition)

 

Glaskin, K. 2005 Innovation and Ancestral Revelation: The Case of Dreams, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 11(2):297-314.

 

Shepard, G. H. Jr. 2002 Three Days for Weeping: Dreams, Emotions, and Death in the Peruvian Amazon, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol 16(2): 200-229. (in reader for Week 11)

 

Kirk, G. S. 1974  Myths as Products of the Psyche (Ch4), In The Nature of Greek Myths. pp. 69-91. London: Penguin Books

 

Dundes, A. 1979 [1962]  Earth-Diver: Creation of the Mythopoeic Male. In W. A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt (eds), Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological approach. 4th Ed. pp. 174-185. NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.

 

Roheim, Geza  1992 Fire in the Dragon and Other Psychoanalytic Essays on Folklore. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. [particularly chapter 4]

 

Descola, P. 1989 ‘Head-Shrinkers Versus Shrinks: Jivaroan Dream Analysis’, Man, Vol 4(3) pp.439-450.

 

Week 8: May 9

 

Intellect or affect?  The phenomenological critique

 

we now shift from an emphasis on the mind and the intellect to the body and the emotions. To do this we must back track a little to an anthropology which preceded Lévi-Strauss.  The distinction between ‘primitive’ thought and rational thought which dominated the French tradition in early anthropology is well-illustrated in the work of Lucien Lévy-Bruhl and his subsequent influence on Maurice Leenhardt (who was also influenced by existential phenomenology). It is important to acquaint yourself with their key ideas before we move on to consider the role of the emotions in ‘mythic consciousness’, and to explore existentialism and phenomenology as it is used in contemporary anthropology.

 

 

 

Required  Readings

 

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1981 Lévy-Bruhl (1857-1939) (Ch 2). In A. Singer (ed.) A History of Anthropological Thought, pp119-131, London and Boston: Faber and

 

Faber.

 

 

 

Clifford, J.  1992 Structures of the Person (Ch XI). In Person and Myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian World. pp. 172-188. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

 

Further reading;

 

Leenhardt, M. 1979  The Living and the Dead (Ch 3). In Do Kamo: Person and Myth in the Melanesian World. pp24-42. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. (In reader for Week 10)

 

Tambiah, S.J.  1990  Multiple orderings of reality: the debate initiated by Lévy-Bruhl (Ch 5). In Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality, pp. 84-90; 93-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

 

 

Week 9: May 16

 

 

 

Lecture: The Phenomenological perspective:  Body, person and myth

 

Cartesian dualism (derived from the philosophy of Rene Descartes in the early part of the 17th century) proposed that our mind and our body were distinct phenomena. This view has continued to dominate Western thinking. Anthropological evidence suggests that this is not the case for all cultures. This week’s readings consider some cross-cultural perspectives on the mind/body relationship, and introduce phenomenology to critique the anthropological approaches of an earlier time.

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Jackson, M. 1983  Knowledge of the Body. Man, New Series, Vol. 18(2):327-345.

 

Strathern, A. 1993 Organs and Emotions: The question of metaphor. Canberra Anthropology, 16(2): 1-16.

 

 

 

Further reading;

 

Smith, A. D. 2007 The flesh of perception: Merleau-Ponty and Husserl,(Ch 1). In T. Baldwin (ed) Reading Merleau-Ponty, pp.1-22. London and New York: Routledge.

 

 

 

Telban, B. 1998  Body, Being and Identity in Ambonwari, Papua New Guinea. In V. Keck (ed.) Common Worlds and Single Lives: Constituting Knowledge in Pacific Societies, pp. 55-70. Oxford and New York: Berg.

 

 

 

 

 

Week 10: RESEARCH WEEK May 23  (major essay due 5pm today)

 

There are no lectures or tutorials this week!

 

Lecture:  Emotion, existentialism, and myth

 

This week we look more closely at the relationship between myth and emotion. The lecture introduces the fundamentals of phenomenological anthropology and the influence of existential philosophy. We focus on Jean-Paul Sartre’s essay on emotional consciousness and consider how this might be applied to the analysis of myth.

 

 

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Van Heekeren, D.  2004 ‘Don’t Tell the Crocodile’: An Existentialist View of Melanesian Myth. Critique of Anthropology, Vol 24(4): 430-454.

 

 

 

Leenhardt, M. 1979  The Living and the Dead (Ch 3). In Do Kamo: Person and Myth in the Melanesian World, pp24-42. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

 

 

 

 

 

Further reading;

 

As for Week 8 and

 

 

 

Sartre, J. 1979  A Sketch of a Phenomenological Theory (Ch 3). In Essays in Existentialism, W. Baskin (ed.), pp 223-251, New Jersey: The Citadel Press.

 

 

 

Rosaldo, R. 1993 Introduction: Grief and a Headhunter’s Rage, pp 1-21, in Culture and Truth: The remaking of Social Analysis, London: Routledge.

 

 

 

Dreyfus, H. 1987 Dialogue 12: Husserl, Heidegger and Modern Existentialism, In B. Magee (ed), pp252-277 The Great Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Macquarrie, J.  1972  Existentialism: An Introduction, guide and assessment, New York: Penguin Books.

 

Guignon, C.  1993  The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (esp. Introduction)

 

Week 11: May 30

 

Lecture:  Grief, healing and music

 

In recent decades ethnomusicology and anthropology have intersected in important ways. Historically anthropologists had given very little attention to the musical dimension of the rituals and other areas of social life they described. In this lecture we explore some of the ways in which music, emotion and healing are intimately connected. We consider how ontology and/or consciousness can be transformed through musical experience.

 

Film: Turnhim het

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Shepard, G. H. Jr. 2002 Three Days for Weeping: Dreams, Emotions, and Death in the Peruvian Amazon, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol 16(2): 200-229.

 

Friedson, S. M.  1996  The Musical Construction of clinical Reality (Ch 4). In Dancing Prophets: Musical Experience in Tumbuka Healing. pp 100-127. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

 

Further reading;

 

Van Heekeren, D. 2011 Singing it ‘local’: the appropriation of Christianity in the Vula’a villages of Papua New Guinea, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Vol February.

 

Kempf, W. 2003  “Songs Cannot Die”: Ritual composing and the politics of emplacement among the Banabans resettled on Rabi Island in Fiji. Journal of Pacific Studies, Vol. 112(1): 33-64.

 

Feld, S.  1990 The Boy Who Became a Muni Bird (Ch1). In Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. pp. 20-43. USA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

 

Telban, B. 2008 The Poetics of the Crocodile: Changing Cultural Perspectives in Ambonwari, Oceania, 78: 217-235.

 

Week 12: June 6

 

Lecture:  The mythic landscape: Being-in-place

 

This week we focus on place as a site of mythic experience and of identity; the relationship of person to place, and the conjunction of person, place and event.

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Kirsch, S.  2004  Changing views of place and time along the Ok Tedi (Ch 9). In A. Rumsey and J. Weiner (eds.) Mining and Indigenous Lifeworlds in Australia and Papua New Guinea, pp. 182-207. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.

 

Morphy, H. 1995  Landscape and the Reproduction of the Past (Ch. 8) In E. Hirsch and M. O’Hanlon (eds.), The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space, pp.184-209. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Further reading;

 

Ingold, T. 2006  Rethinking the Animate, Re-Animating Thought, Ethnos Vol 71(1):9-20.

 

Feld, S. and Basso, K. (eds.) 1996 Senses of Place. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. (especially the intro by Casey, E. S.  ‘How to get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time:Phenomenological Prolegomena’,  pp13-53.)

 

Hirsch, E. 2006  Landscape, Myth and Time, Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 11 1/2:151-165

 

Strehlow,  T.G.H. 1978 Central Australian Religion. pp. 14-26. Bedford Park: AASR

 

Peterson, N.  1972  Totemism Yesterday. Man. (N.S.) 7: 12-25.

 

Week 13: June 13 (take-home exam distributed in tutorial, due Jun 18 no extensions)

 

Lecture:  ‘Myth’ or ‘history’? The problem of truth

 

In this lecture we consider the myth/history dichotomy in light of the issue of ‘truth’. Some important questions are raised; can myths be true and if so are they the same as history?  What is the real difference between myth and history, and what does this mean for those in transition from oral history to written history?

 

Required Tutorial Readings

 

Gewertz, D. And F. Errington  1991 The Written Word (Ch 5). In Twisted histories, altered contexts: Representing the Chambri in a world system. pp. 147-168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1995  When Myth Becomes History (Ch 4). In Myth and Meaning. Pp. 34-43, Foreword, Wendy Doniger pp.vii-xv, New York: Shoken Books.

 

Further reading;

 

Kolig, Erich 2000 Social causality, human agency and mythology: Some thoughts on history—consciousness and mythical sense among Australian Aborigines. Anthropological Forum, Vol 10(1): 9-22.

 

Worsley, P.  1955  Totemism in a Changing Society, American Anthropologist. 57: 851-61.

Van Heekeren, D. 2007 The Essence of Vula’a Historical Consciousness, History and Anthropology. Vol. 18(4): 405-426.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policies and Procedures

Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:

Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html

Assessment Policy  http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html

Grading Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html

Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html

Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html

Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.

In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.

Student Code of Conduct

Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/

Student Support

Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/

Learning Skills

Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.

Student Services and Support

Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.

Student Enquiries

For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au

IT Help

For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/

When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.

Graduate Capabilities

Discipline Specific Knowledge and Skills

Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcomes

  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project
  • Understand key themes, theories and issues in the anthropology of myth and symbolic anthropology
  • Participate in group discussion and formulate discussion questions relevant to the themes of the unit

Assessment tasks

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Critical, Analytical and Integrative Thinking

We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcomes

  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project
  • Understand key themes, theories and issues in the anthropology of myth and symbolic anthropology

Assessment tasks

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Problem Solving and Research Capability

Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcomes

  • Execute anthropological methods of collection and analysis
  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts
  • Develop critical analysis and creative thinking skills through a tutorial exercise and an essay project

Assessment tasks

  • 2
  • 3

Creative and Innovative

Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcome

  • Participate in group discussion and formulate discussion questions relevant to the themes of the unit

Assessment task

  • 2

Effective Communication

We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcome

  • Participate in group discussion and formulate discussion questions relevant to the themes of the unit

Assessment tasks

  • 1
  • 4

Engaged and Ethical Local and Global citizens

As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.

This graduate capability is supported by:

Learning outcome

  • Examine and evaluate a range of ethnographic and theoretical texts

Assessment task

  • 1