Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Trudy Ambler
Contact via trudy.ambler@mq.edu.au
W6A136
By Appointment
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
2
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
45cp and permission of Executive Dean of Faculty
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
Among the contexts for research in Australia is a federal policy designed to ensure that the human participants in research are treated ethically. The Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2009) establishes criteria for most types of research that involve human participants and it requires that researchers adhere to these criteria. When researchers are planning studies covered by this policy they must design their projects in ways that conform to its requirements. Additionally researchers must submit their research projects for approval to institutional Review Boards. This unit aims to provide students with an introduction to ethics as an important part of research in the Arts. The unit also explores ethics in professional and personal contexts and prepares participants to engage with society as an ethically aware citizen capable of informed professional and personal judgment.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Online Quiz | 20% | 25th August 2014 |
Ethics Leaflet | 30% | 19th September 2014 |
Ethics Portrait | 30% | 3rd November 2014 |
Active Participation | 20% | 24th November 2014 |
Due: 25th August 2014
Weighting: 20%
Complete an online quiz about the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
Due: 19th September 2014
Weighting: 30%
Research, design and produce a leaflet that explains to other University students the key ethical values that inform research involving humans. Share your leaflet with a fellow student and reflect on the feedback that you receive about the effectiveness of your leaflet. See the information in iLearn for more details about the requirements for this assignment.
This task will be assessed by the following criteria: content, structure, design, writing style, referencing and reflection. A detailed rubric for this task will be supplied in the Assessment section in iLearn.
Due: 3rd November 2014
Weighting: 30%
Use digital images and text to create a portrait of your personal ethics framework. Further details about this assignment are available in ilearn.
This task will be assessed by the following criteria: engagement with key concepts, response to concepts, introduction, design, writing style, referencing. A detailed rubric for this task will be supplied in the Assessment section in iLearn.
Due: 24th November 2014
Weighting: 20%
Make a positive contribution to the online discsussions and complete the online activiies throughout the unit. All online discussions and activities should be completed by the due date.
This task will be assessed according to the following criteria: quantity and quality of initial as well as follow-up postings (incl. use of references to support views, clarity and style, interaction with others). A detailed rubric for this task will be supplied in the Assessment section in iLearn.
Unit Requirements
During the unit students will be required to:
Online Participation Guidelines
A significant part of your online learning experience involves learning with and from other students and the teacher in the online discussions and activities. Active participation means sharing information and resources, posting your own ideas, and critiquing or expanding on the ideas of others in a respectful and collegial fashion. You are expected to follow accepted standards of English spelling, grammar and punctuation, when you are participating in web discussions or sending emails. These discussions are for you to exchange your reflections with your classmates and teacher about what you are learning. The discussions will be organised into forums around the particular themes you are studying.
As an online student, you will be taking a proactive approach to your learning. As the Unit Convenor’s role is that of a learning guide, your role is that of the leader in your own learning. You will be managing your own time so that you can complete the readings, activities and assignments for the unit.
Submission of Assignment
All work is to be submitted via the Turnitin function inside the ilearn site.
Return of marked work
Marked work will be returned to students electronically via ilearn.
Electronic Submissions
Information about how to submit work online can be accessed through the ilearn unit.
Examinations
Important: There are no examinations in this unit.
Special Consideration and Extensions
Please email the unit convenor if you find yourself unable to meet the submission dates for assessments.
Technology
Online units can be accessed at: https://ilearn.mq.edu.au/login/MQ/
1. For technical support with passwords or to check if the Learning Management System (LMS) is down, go to http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/
2. This unit is taught fully on line and access to the internet and a computer are essentail (mobile technology such as an iphone or ipad are not sufficent for this course).
3. For Learning & Teaching issues e.g. how to access your online materials such as readings, i-lecture, please contact the Unit Convenor.
4. For basic training in how to use the LMS, please go to http://mq.edu.au/iLearn/student_info/index.htm
Academic Honesty Policy
Academic honesty is an integral part of the core values and principles contained in the Macquarie University Ethics Statement (http://www.mq.edu.au/ethics/ethic-statement-final.html). Its fundamental principle is that all staff and students act with integrity in the creation, development, application and use of ideas and information. This means that:
The link below has more details about the policy, procedure and schedule of penalties that will apply to breaches of the Academic Honesty policy.
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
University Grading Policy
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
The grade a student receives will signify their overall performance in meeting the learning outcomes of a unit of study. Grades will not be awarded by reference to the achievement of other students nor allocated to fit a predetermined distribution. In determining a grade, due weight will be given to the learning outcomes and level of a unit (ie 100, 200, 300, 800 etc). Graded units will use the following grades:
HD High Distinction 85-100
D Distinction 75-84
Cr Credit 65-74
P Pass 50-64
F Fail 0-49
REQUIRED READING
Adams, J., S., Armen, T. & Shore, T., H. (2001). Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 29 (3), 199-211.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (2009). Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies. Accessed: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical.html
Davis, M. (1997). Indigenous Peoples and Intellectual Property Rights. Parliament of Australia, Parliamentary Library, Research Paper, 20.
Fritzsche, D., J. & Oz, E. (2007). Personal Values - Influence on the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 335–343.
Lehavot, K. (2009). “My Space” or Yours? The Ethical Dilemma of Graduate Students’ Personal Lives on the Internet. Ethics and Behaviour, 19(2), 129–141.
Nancy K. Freeman (1999): Morals and Character: The Foundations of Ethics and Professionalism, The Educational Forum, 63:1, 30-36
National Health and Medical Research Council (2009). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Accessed: Tuesday, December 14, 2010
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_0.pdf
National Health & Medical Research Council (2001).Intellectual Property Management For Health and Medical Research. Accessed: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 NHMRC Interim Guidelines for Intellectual Property Management for Health and Medical Research (PDF, 96KB)
Research Ethics in Australia (Research Involving Human Participants V2) Online Ethics Centre for Engineering 6/14/2006 National Academy of Engineering Accessed: Tuesday February 14, 2012 http://www.onlineethics.org/Topics/RespResearch/ResResources/nbacindex/nbachindex/hchalmers.aspx
Robert, V., Carlson, Kenneth, M., Boyd, and David, J., Webb (2004). The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future. Br J Clin Pharmacol, June; 57(6), 695-713.
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. Accessed: Tuesday, December 14, 2010
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
RECOMMENDED READING
Brody, B., A. (2009). Special Section: Expanding the Boundaries of Bioethics. Research Ethics: International Perspectives. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 6(4), 376-384.
Frankel, S., M. (1989). Professional Codes: Why, How, and with What Impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 8 (2-3).
Guillemin, Marilys, Heggen, Kristin (2009). Rapport and Respect: Negotiating Ethical Relations between Researcher and Participant. A European Journal, 12(3), 291-299.
Pierce, M., A., & Henry, J., W. (1996) Computer Ethics: The Role of Personal, Informal, and Formal Codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 425-437.
Watkins, J. (1999). Conflicting Codes: Professional, Ethical, and Legal Obligations in Archaeology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(3), 337-345.
This unit of study consists of a series of ten key themes (some of which are sub-divided into smaller sections). It is also organised into two main parts. The first part (themes 1-6) is mostly an introduction to ethics in research. Its purpose is to provide the resources, knowledge, and information – including historical background and critical terminology – that you’ll need to know in order to demonstrate a reasonable degree of understanding related to the ethical issues underpinning research in Australia. The second part (that is to say, themes 7-10), is mainly concerned with applying the ideas, principles, arguments, and ethical insights introduced in themes 1- 6 to a range of professional and personal contexts. It is assumed that no student in the course will have had much experience studying ethics.
Overall, the total time you are expected to devote to your coursework is 78 hours. If for some reason you find yourself falling behind or unable to complete an assignment on schedule you should immediately notify the Course Convenor.
Module 1 |
Introducing Ethics |
Module 2 |
The values and principles underpinning the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. |
Module 3 |
The historical context for ethics and the ethical review of human research in Australia. |
Module 4 |
Values and Principles of Ethical Research in Action – Section 1
|
Module 5 |
Values and Ethical Research Principles in Action – Section 2
|
Module 6 |
Ethical considerations for research involving particular categories of human participants. |
Module 7 |
Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies. |
Module 8 |
Unpacking the ethical principles underpinning research involving Australian Indigenous peoples. |
Module 9 |
Ethical Codes of Practice in the Professions |
Module 10 |
Ethics at Work in our Personal Lives. |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html
Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by: