Assessment Criteria

We appreciate that not all students possess the same degree of verbal confidence, and not all are equally articulate. In the same way, not all are equally good at written work, problem solving, essay writing, or any other form of assessment. The reason a variety of assessment strategies has been used in the unit is to cater to a range of different strengths, as well as to develop a range of desired skills. If you anticipate difficulties with class participation, talk to your tutor EARLY to discuss strategies to assist you. One of the reasons for assessing class participation is to encourage students to develop oral communication skills through practice, in an environment far less intimidating than the world of professional practice. What we are keen to see is real effort to develop and/or enhance existing oral skills. Asking questions is a very good way of learning, and frequently the student who asks the “dumb question” is voicing what others are also thinking, with the result that everybody is helped to clarify the material. Your tutor cannot identify and deal with misunderstandings unless you speak up. The point of seminars is to come sufficiently prepared to enable you, and others, to benefit from the class, and to go away having increased your understanding. Marks for class participation encourage active learning, regular reading, elucidation and clarification of difficulties, questioning and analysis of material, and enhance oral skills. Attendance at seminar classes is relevant to the mark you receive, but by itself will not attract marks. Please bear in mind that attendance without participation is comparable to handing in blank pages for a written assignment.

Your work will be assessed according to the extent of your:

Excellent

= HD-D

Good

= Credit

Satisfactory

= Pass

Unsatisfactory

= Fail

Preparation for class: Demonstrated by relevance of participation to general discussion

Has the capacity to notice important information in the readings and use it to build new arguments in class discussion

Uses information in the readings to enhance learning in the class discussion

Notices basic contextual issues and asks questions

Fails to identify important information in readings and their relevance to discussion in class

Understanding and expressing abstract and complex ideas orally

Can generalise from personal reflection on the readings and evaluate the efficacy of the ideas from a number of standpoints

Can synthesise a number of concepts or factors arising from the readings into a larger idea and construct own position.

Limited capacity to synthesise a number ideas from the readings into a larger argument

Responses remain anecdotal and not related to the readings

Assisting other class members by contributing to student learning

Elucidates complex ideas succinctly, building on the ideas expressed by others or distinguishing their own ideas

Some interaction with other students' views but can be limited to paraphrasing

Listens to other views but does not integrate in discussion

Does not manage to see another point of view

Expressing and countering arguments orally

Articulates a position supported by the readings, and is able to defend that position or is able to modify that position on the basis of alternative viewpoints on the readings; is able to effectively counter other student viewpoints basing their arguments on the readings

Expresses a position based on the readings, but may be unable to support or modify that position when challenged; attempts to counter other student viewpoints using the readings mainly

Can express a viewpoint that is not explicitly based on the readings and is unable to maintain or modify their own viewpoint; mainly uses personal opinion to counter other student viewpoints

Has difficulty formulating own opinion or relating to another’s opinion

Listening attentively and showing respect to other students participating in class

Independent thinker, takes initiative in discussion as well as co-operating effectively with others

Relates professionally to colleagues. Makes sound contributions to the discussion

Attempts to relate to colleagues and engage in discussion

Does not make an effort to relate to colleagues and engage in discussion

Your work will be assessed according to the extent of your:

Excellent

= HD-D

Good

= Credit

Satisfctory

= Pass

 Unsatisfactory

= Fail

Understanding of the law in this area

Thorough and accurate understanding of rules, concepts and processes of law. Uses this knowledge to abstract principles and applies them in novel situations. Uses concepts to build new knowledge and understanding. Recognises the limitations of current law and theories about them.

Thorough and accurate understanding of rules, concepts and processes of law and can analyse and apply them in new situations.

Knows basic concepts and rules and can use them to solve problems and extend to new areas

 Knows a few rules and concepts.

Focused introduction

Uses the introduction to formulate a clear argument, identify parts of the argument, relevant issues and theories that will be addressed. Recognises the limitations of current thinking and the need for new ways of thinking.

Can formulate an argument, and identify relevant issues and theories to be addressed.

Basic introduction with all the formal elements but stops short of giving  clear picture of the essay.

Formal introduction with not clear articulation of the argument or structure.

Coherent Structure and Written Expression – use of headings, systematic and coherent organization of ideas in paragraphs and sections

Meets all expectations and conventions. Distinctive personal style in the specific execution of the task. A unique but appropriate presentation of work.

Fulfils standard conventions with all expected attributes present. Some translation and interpretation of the conventions to suit personal style and the specific execution of the task.

Fulfils basic expectations regarding the formatting and presentation of work. E.g., titles name on work, introduction, conclusion. Spell checked & grammatically correct.

Lacks a coherent structure of argument, organization of ideas into different sections, fails to use spell checker, some sentences fail to use correct grammatical rules.

Depth of Analysis - Students may be able to deepen their analysis of the materials by critiquing developments in native title law that they will use to develop their argument

 Uses principles to formulate a position or an argument about the literature. Can articulate the limited nature of their argument and can challenge the boundaries of disciplinary understanding.

Recognises competing explanations and can identify the relative merits and limitations of an argument. Can describe and defend their own view or position.

Mostly reports others' views without assessing them. Little interpretation or translation to a new problem or issue.

Descriptive account of the available literature without any or very little analysis.

Developed and Sustained Argument – synthesis of the ideas drawn from the unit materials in a systematic and coherent structure

Uses available ideas and theories accurately. Abstracts and applies them in novel situations. Uses concepts to build new knowledge and understanding. Recognises the limitations of current thinking

Shows a thorough and accurate understanding of concepts and processes. Has the capacity to analyse and apply them in new situations

Knows basic concepts and rules. Requires more effort in synthesizing own arguments.

Knows some of the ideas and rules. Does not extend own analysis or argument.

Consistent Conclusion – briefly sum up at the end main findings that may be drawn from the argument in your paper

 Makes a major contribution to the essay by pulling together all strands of the argument. Makes a judicious use of the available space to reinforce the argument of the essay.

Makes a significant contribution to the structure of the essay. Can pull together various strands of the argument.

Competent summary of the main arguments with very little effort at reinforcing the argument.

Repetitious reiteration of points already discussed without any efort to reinforce the argument.

Use of AGLC Style Guide for footnotes and bibliography

References and citations, including the bibliography use accurate, consistent and appropriate styles. Good effort at adapting the approach to different disciplinary conventions when using non-law literature.

References and citations, including the bibliography are accurate, consistent and appropriate.

References and citations are basically accurate in style. Occasional lack of consistency; reasonable acknowledgment of the sources of information

Absence or inaccurate use of referencing and citation conventions

Your work will be assessed according to the extent of your:

Excellent

= HD-D

Good

= Credit

Satisfactory

= Pass

Unsatisfactory

= Fail

Knowledge of the law and understanding of the issues arising in your area of research.

Thorough and accurate understanding of rules, concepts and processes of law. Uses this knowledge to abstract principles and applies them in novel situations. Uses concepts to build new knowledge and understanding. Recognises the limitations of current law and theories about them.

Thorough and accurate understanding of rules, concepts and processes of law and can analyse and apply them in new situations.

Knows basic concepts and rules and can use them to solve problems and extend to new areas

Knows a few rules and concepts. Does not use any theoretical understanding of the issues.

Introduction: uses to articulate an argument, explain structure of essay, enumerate issues that will be discussed to substantiate the argument

Uses the introduction to formulate a clear argument, identify parts of the argument, relevant issues and theories that will be addressed.

Recognises the limitations of current thinking and the need for new ways of thinking.

Can formulate an argument, and identify relevant issues and theories to be addressed.

Basic introduction that contains all the formal elements but stops short of giving a clear picture of the essay.

Formal introduction with not a clear articulation of the argument or structure of the essay.

Depth of analysis: the depth of analysis as demonstrated by moving beyond descriptive analysis of the research materials and development of one's own argument

Uses principles to formulate a position or an argument about the literature. Can articulate the limited nature of their argument and can challenge the boundaries of disciplinary understanding.

Recognises competing explanations and can identify the relative merits and limitations of an argument. Can describe and defend their own view or position.

Mostly reports others' views without assessing them. Little interpretation or translation to a new problem or issue.

Descriptive account of the available literature without any or very little analysis.

 Argument:  Ideas drawn from the research materials should be synthesized in a systematic and coherent structure

 Uses available ideas and theories accurately. Abstracts and applies them in novel situations. Uses concepts to build new knowledge and understanding. Recognises the limitations of current thinking.

 Shows a thorough and accurate understanding of concepts and processes. Has the capacity to analyse and apply them in new situations.

 Knows basic concepts and rules. Requires more effort in synthesizing own arguments.

  Knows some of the ideas and rules. Does not extend own analysis or argument

Coherent Structure: Systematic and coherent organisation of ideas in sentences/paragraphs/sections; Separate Introduction and Conclusion; Use of sub-headings

Written Expression: Clear written expression, ideas structured in sentences, correct grammar/spelling

 Meets all expectations and conventions. Distinctive personal style in the specific execution of the task. A unique but appropriate presentation of work.

 Fulfils standard conventions with all expected attributes present. Some translation and interpretation of the conventions to suit personal style and the specific execution of the task.

 Fulfils basic expectations regarding the formatting and presentation of work. E.g., titles name on work, introduction, conclusion. Spell checked & grammatically correct.

  Lacks a coherent structure of argument, organization of ideas into different sections, fails to use spell checker, some sentences fail to use correct grammatical rules.

Use of AGLC Style Guide for footnotes and bibliography

 References and citations, including the bibliography use accurate, consistent and appropriate styles. Good effort at adapting the approach to different disciplinary conventions when using non-law literature.

References and citations, including the bibliography are accurate, consistent and appropriate.

References and citations are basically accurate in style. Occasional lack of consistency; reasonable acknowledgment of the sources of information.

 Absence or inaccurate use of referencing and citation conventions.