Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Unit Convenor
Jeanette Kennett
Contact via jeanette.kennett@mq.edu.au
W6A 736
TBA
Co-convenor
Matthew Millar
Contact via matthew.millar@mq.edu.au
W6A 740
TBA
Tutor - external students
Douglas McConnell
Contact via douglas.mcconnell@students.mq.edu.au
TBA
Tutor
Kelly Hamilton
Contact via kelly.hamilton@mq.edu.au
TBA
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
12cp or admission to GDipArts
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
Is morality more a matter of reason or of passion? While we often think of strong emotions and desires as a threat to virtue, leading to action which is weak-willed or compulsive, recent work in psychology and neuroscience has tended to support a sentimentalist account of morality. This evidence suggests that moral judgments are intuitive, emotional judgments and that paradigmatically evil individuals such as psychopaths are deficient in empathy not in rationality. They know what is wrong but they just don't care. They are bad not mad! Empathy or sympathy seems to be essential to the development of conscience, moral understanding, and morally good action. Yet most evil actions are not performed by psychopaths. We will critically examine philosophical and psychological literature on the contribution of a range of cognitive processes including memory, emotion, mindreading, planning and imagination to moral competence and moral motivation and reconsider whether limited rationality or limited sympathy is the key to understanding a range of moral failings and impairments. We will also examine the role of disease or disorder in explaining both ordinary and extreme cases of wrongdoing.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Unit Requirements and Expectations: Attendance
For internal students only:
Lectures: attendance at lectures is required. Absences must be supported by medical certificates or equivalent. You will only be eligible to pass the unit if you have attended at least 70% of the lectures.
Students can request an exemption from the lecture attendance requirement on the grounds of timetable clashes or for other reasons the unit convenor deems acceptable. Supporting documentation must be provided. Exemption requests must be made in writing (email) to the unit convenor by the end of week 2.
Tutorials: attendance at tutorials is required. Absences must be supported by medical certificates or equivalent. You will only be eligible to pass the unit if you have attended at least 80% of tutorials.
For external students: There is no on-campus session for this unit. External students are expected to contribute to the online discussion board on a regular basis. You will only be eligible to pass the unit if you have contributed to at least 80% of the weekly topics for discussion posted there.
Weekly Tutorial Responses
The weekly responses must show that the student has read and reflected on the relevant text in relation to the week’s topic. Responses will be recorded as either satisfactory (S) or not satisfactory (N). Responses that show little understanding of or engagement with the relevant text or which are vague, superficial or too short will be graded N. Responses that show a genuine attempt to understand the issues will be graded S, even if there are problems of understanding and interpretation. Weekly responses must be handed in at the end of the relevant tutorial or, for online students, on the day specified by your online tutor. Late submissions will not be accepted unless the delay is caused by illness or other unavoidable disruptions (see 'Extensions and Special Consideration').
Each tutorial is worth a possible 2 marks. Students will receive 1 mark for each satisfactory written response they submit and a mark out of 1 for attendance and participation. Note: students who attend every tutorial can still receive less than 10/ 20 for this section if their participation and written responses are inadequate. Individual comments will not be given, but the tutor will provide general feedback in tutorials or in the online forum for external students. The last tutorial of the semester (week 11) will be devoted to essay plans, so students will not be required to submit written answers to that week’s tutorial questions. Attendance and participation for this final tutorial will be worth 2 marks.
Assignment Submission
Assignments in this course will be submitted electronically, as Word documents. There is no need for a coversheet - the iLearn assignment submission (Turnitin) involves declaring your details and honesty in submitting your work. Please note, we do not accept submission by email attachment.
Extensions and Special Consideration
Requests for extensions must, normally, be made in writing before the due date. Extensions of up to 3 days can be granted by your tutor if reasonable grounds are given, and some written documentation can be produced. Work load from other units, or from employment, are not considered reasonable justification.
Requests for extensions of more than 3 days should be submitted via a Disruption to Studies Request, which is available in the ask.mq.edu.au portal. Your request should be accompanied by appropriate documentation, such as a medical certificate. Please see the Disruption to Studies policy in the list of policies at the end of this document for further details.
Penalties for Late Submission
You will lose 10% of the value of the assignment for every 4 days that it is late. Work will not be accepted after 2 weeks from the due date unless you have submitted a disruption to studies request.
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Short essay | 25% | September 11 |
Preparation and Participation | 20% | Continuous |
Three Tutorial Responses | 15% | October 16 |
Essay Plan | 5% | Week 11 |
Major essay | 35% | November 9 |
Due: September 11
Weighting: 25%
800-1000 word essay comparing Hume and Kant on moral judgment and motivation.
Due: Continuous
Weighting: 20%
Students will write a short (typed) reflection/response or answer questions on a key text each week and bring this to class as a basis for tutorial discussion. Responses must be submitted at the end of the tutorial. External students will post them to the online forum. Your response or answers should be a minimum of 150 words.
Due: October 16
Weighting: 15%
Students must select three of their submitted tutorial responses to revise for grading. The aim of this task is to encourage students to revisit their original responses and to make revisions or additions that reflect developments or changes in their thinking about the issues (600-800 words).
Due: Week 11
Weighting: 5%
In week 11 students must bring a one page essay plan and bibliography to tutorials for discussion and guided peer assessment. External students will participate in a similar exercise online.
Due: November 9
Weighting: 35%
Students will be expected to analyse a case study of evil using the relevant concepts introduced in the unit and making use of the appropriate unit readings. 1600 words.
Required Reading
All required readings and most supplementary readings are available from the library on e-Reserve. There is no reader for this unit. A week-by-week schedule of required readings and supplementary readings can be found on the PHIL226 iLearn homepage.
Technology Used and Required
We use an iLearn website. Lectures are recorded. Lecture slides and any other material you need will be available through the iLearn website. We recommend you have access to a reliable internet connection throughout semester.
Week 1: Introduction: Moral judgment and moral motivation
Week 2: What is evil?
Week 3. Evil and bad morality: Limited sympathy or limited rationality?
Week 4: Emotion based accounts of moral judgment and motivation in philosophy and psychology
Week 5: Reason based accounts of moral judgment and motivation in philosophy and psychology
Week 6: Testing the accounts. Psychopathy and acquired sociopathy.
Week 7: Testing the accounts: Autism
Semester break 14-28 September
Week 8: Mad or bad?
Week 9: What do we lack when we lack conscience?
Week 10: Moral identity
Week 11: Moral Responsibility and Moral Motivation
Week 12: Evil and Responsibility: Can someone be evil but not responsible?
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html
Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by: