Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Convenor
Rob Trevor
Contact via Email
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
2
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
(Admission to MAppFin or PGCertAppFin or GradDipAppFin) and permission of Executive Dean of Faculty
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
A student may submit a Research Paper as an alternative to a unit-work elective, subject to approval of the Executive Dean. Students complete a Research Paper of about 10,000 words or of similar substance. For example, quantitative work may have fewer words but will include other material. A research plan for this unit must be approved by the student's Supervisor and Research Director in order to enrol in the unit.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Research Paper | 100% | Set by Supervisor |
Due: Set by Supervisor
Weighting: 100%
Summary of Assessment Task
Individual / Group: Individual
Due Date: The due date will normally be set by the Supervisor and should be agreed by the Student in writing. Penalties for late submission may apply at the Supervisor’s discretion.
Grading Method: Refer to 'Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily' section
Submission Method: Directly to Supervisor.
Length:
Extension Requests:
Replication studies are recommended for students wishing to undertake empirical research. By replicating an existing study, students will gain insight into research techniques and reduce the risk of exploring unfruitful topics, making technical errors or attempting unduly difficult research projects. For example, you may select an academic paper that interests you, then apply the same or similar methods to more recent data or a different market. As a benchmark guide, successful completion of such a study may result in a Credit grade. Students who successfully build on the original study with new techniques, insights or critiques may receive a Distinction grade or higher. Failure to adequately replicate the earlier study would result in a Pass or Fail grade, depending on how far short the research fell of achieving the benchmark replication.
Some academic papers in finance develop theory that is difficult to apply in practice. For example, assumptions of a theoretical model may be unrealistic or parameter estimation may be difficult. As an example of this type of research, you might take a theoretical capital structure model that incorporates the cost of financial distress and work out how it could be applied to a specific company, or range of companies. In a study like this, successful completion would result in a Pass grade if reasonable simplifications are made and appropriate methods used to estimate the parameters of the model. Some originality would be required for a Credit grade and there should be substantial innovation for a grade of Distinction or higher.
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html
Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Students should also consult the MAFC Program Rules & Procedures found at http://www.mafc.mq.edu.au
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
For all student enquires, please contact studentsupport@mafc.mq.edu.au
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
Learning Skills (http://www.students.mq.edu.au/support/learning_skills/) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our postgraduates will demonstrate a high standard of discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgment. They will have the ability to make informed choices and decisions that reflect both the nature of their professional work and their personal perspectives.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of utilising and reflecting on prior knowledge and experience, of applying higher level critical thinking skills, and of integrating and synthesising learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments. A characteristic of this form of thinking is the generation of new, professionally oriented knowledge through personal or group-based critique of practice and theory.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of systematic enquiry; able to use research skills to create new knowledge that can be applied to real world issues, or contribute to a field of study or practice to enhance society. They will be capable of creative questioning, problem finding and problem solving.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be ethically aware and capable of confident transformative action in relation to their professional responsibilities and the wider community. They will have a sense of connectedness with others and country and have a sense of mutual obligation. They will be able to appreciate the impact of their professional roles for social justice and inclusion related to national and global issues
This graduate capability is supported by:
This Unit Guide may be subject to change. The latest version is on the Centre’s web site www.mafc.mq.edu.au.
Students should read the Unit Guide carefully at the start of semester. It contains important information about the unit. If anything is unclear, please consult your Research Supervisor.
University Policy on Grading:
Specific Unit Grading:
Grade | Expectation |
---|---|
High Distinction | Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline. |
Distinction | Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. |
Credit | Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline. |
Pass | Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes. |
Fail | Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline. |
Review of Grade and final examination Script viewing:
Date | Description |
---|---|
07/08/2015 | Update |