Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Angela Irwin
Julian Droogan
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
12cp
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit will provide a theoretical and empirical introduction to the study of cybercrime. Students will analyse cybercrime and associated criminology theories with reference to a range of cyber-offences, including hacking, cyber-stalking, online drug distribution and online state/corporate espionage. Legal and policing responses to these offences, and the challenges associated with regulating new technologies will be considered. New and emerging issues associated with cybercrime, including cyber-vigilantism and encrypted internet spaces such as the Dark Net, will also be explored.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Tutorial/online participation | 10% | Throughout semester |
Assessment 1: PPT Presentation | 20% | 15/03/2015 |
Mid-semester quiz | 10% | 19/04/2015 |
Research essay | 50% | 31/05/2015 |
End-of-semester quiz | 10% | 07/06/2015 |
Due: Throughout semester
Weighting: 10%
Internal students are required to actively participate in tutorials. Active participation means more than just attendance. To actively participate, students need also to prepare for tutorials by completing required readings and attending/listening to lectures, and then engage in tutorial activities and discussions. Lecturers/tutors are looking for informed contributions, that is, posing or addressing questions and making contributions that reflect an understanding of course content.
Tutorial participation marks are therefore determined by your lecturer/tutor over the semester according to the following 3 criteria: (1) attendance; (2) active participation in tutorial activities and class discussion; and (3) evidence of engagement with readings and course content. To qualify for this assessment, students must attend at least 80% of the tutorials throughout the session. Students who miss a tutorial must provide relevant documentation (e.g. a medical certificate) if they wish to avoid being marked as absent.
External students are required to provide at least one response per week to a question posed by the online coordinator. As is the case with internal students, online contributions must reflect understanding of the course content. Weekly online contributions need to be at least 100 words in total (referencing not required).
This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:
Due: 15/03/2015
Weighting: 20%
Research findings suggest that criminality results from a variety of different causes occurring at various levels (from societal levels, through community and social influence theories, to specific individual theories). Many of these criminological theories can be applied to cybercriminal acts. Select one of the types of cybercrime covered in the unit (i.e. cyber-piracy, cyber-vigilantism, online drug distribution etc.) and look at it through the lens of one or more of the criminological theories which, in your view, best explains why a person might engage in that type of cybercrime. You can choose from general strain theory, routine activity theory, deterrence theory, social learning and self-control theory, deviant subculture theory, addiction theory, arousal theory, rational choice theory. If you feel that there is another theory, which is not covered in the unit, which better explains your selected cybercrime, please feel free to use it.
In your presentation you should state why you have selected the theory or theories that you have and provide examples of why your selected theory(ies) explains why an individual may engage in that specific cybercriminal behaviour.
Students are required to complete a PowerPoint Presentation with presenters’ notes that, if presented orally, would extend to around 8 to 10 minutes (approximately 10 slides). PLEASE NOTE: No oral presentation is required for this assessment task. Each slide should contain logical, clear and easily understood points that demonstrate understanding of the topic. The notes section of the presentation should discuss or argue the relevance of each of the bullet points in the body of the slide. This enables the lecturer/tutor to assess your understanding of the topic. You should also place in the notes section the details of the references that you have used in each slide.
Use of SAGE Harvard referencing style is mandatory. You can find guidelines on SAGE Harvard referencing style on the unit iLearn page. All presentations will be checked through plagiarism software.
If no extension is sought and the assessment is submitted late, 5% of the available mark will be deducted for the first day the submission is late and 2% each subsequent day after that.
The criteria used to assess the PowerPoint presentation (marking template) will be posted to iLearn.
Marks should be available to students within three weeks of submission.
This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:
Due: 19/04/2015
Weighting: 10%
This is the first assessed online quiz and will cover lecture and reading material from modules 4-7.
This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:
Due: 31/05/2015
Weighting: 50%
The research essay is the major piece of work for the semester. Students are required to select one of four research questions, conduct in-depth research and construct a well framed, critical argument. Essays should be well supported by scholarly research and interact with relevant cyber-policing theories/policy issues.
Use of SAGE Harvard referencing style is mandatory. You can find guidelines on SAGE Harvard referencing style on the unit iLearn page.
All essays will be checked through plagiarism software.
If no extension is sought and the assessment is submitted late, 5% of the available mark will be deducted for the first day the submission is late and 2% each subsequent day after that.
The criteria used to assess the research essay (marking template) will be posted to iLearn.
Marks should be available to students within three weeks of submission.
This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:
Due: 07/06/2015
Weighting: 10%
This is the final assessed online quiz and will cover lecture and reading material from modules 8-13.
This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes:
UNIT REQUIREMENTS AND EXPECTATIONS
REQUIRED READINGS
TECHNOLOGY USED AND REQUIRED
SUBMITTING ASSESSMENT TASKS
LATE SUBMISSION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS
WORD LIMITS FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
REASSESSMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS DURING THE SEMESTER
Week 1: Introduction to the unit
Week 2: The transformational effect of cyberspace on crime
Week 3: Application of theories of crime to cybercrime
Week 4: Online fraud, scams and identity theft: what makes a victim?
Week 5: Cyber-piracy: We know it’s wrong by why won’t we stop?
Week 6: Crimes of the rich and powerful (stage and corporate)
Week 7: Online drug distribution and The Dark Net
Week 8: Should crimes committed in virtual worlds be treated as seriously as real-world crimes?
Week 9: Computer content crime: offensive communications, obscene materials and harmful content
Week 10: Cyber-vigilantism: Anonymous and other similar groups
Week 11: International response to cybercrime, cyber-policing and online governance
Week 12: Mass surveillance and invasion of privacy
Week 13: The future of cybercrime/ emerging issues and unit wrap up
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html
Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will have enquiring minds and a literate curiosity which will lead them to pursue knowledge for its own sake. They will continue to pursue learning in their careers and as they participate in the world. They will be capable of reflecting on their experiences and relationships with others and the environment, learning from them, and growing - personally, professionally and socially.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be aware of and have respect for self and others; to be able to work with others as a leader and a team player; to have a sense of connectedness with others and country; and to have a sense of mutual obligation. Our graduates should be informed and active participants in moving society towards sustainability.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Date | Description |
---|---|
07/01/2015 | Changes have been made to the wording of the assessments |