Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Unit convenor
Helen Little
Contact via via iLearn dialogue
X5B364
Monday 10am - 1pm or by appointment
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
39cp including ECH113
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit examines the role of outdoor environments in providing opportunities for young children to engage in discovery and creative play and physical activity. The unit builds on students’ foundational understanding of play-based pedagogies to enhance their capacity to recognise, evaluate and design play-based environments and experiences that promote learning for children from birth to school age. The unit explores inter-relationships between affordances in the outdoor environment, children’s play behaviours and their learning, with a particular emphasis on relationship-based learning, scientific inquiry, problem-solving and physical activity. The unit requires students to engage critically with a range of relevant contemporary issues which have the potential to impact on children’s opportunities for learning and development. Students also consider issues of inclusive practice for children with different educational and developmental capabilities and with different social and cultural backgrounds.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
PLEASE REFER TO INFORMATION ON iLEARN FOR FULL DETAILS OF ASSESSMENT TASKS AND MARKING CRITERIA
All assessment tasks for this unit are submitted online.
IEC Assessment Presentation & Submission Guidelines
Please follow these guidelines when you submit each assignment:
Draft Submissions & Turnitin Originality Reports
When preparing your assignments, it is essential that:
Final Submissions
Late Assessments:
A deduction of 5% of the total possible mark allocated for that assessment would be made for each day or part day that assessment is late, weekends counting as two days. For example, if an assessment is worth 20 marks and you submit it 2 days late, you will have 2 marks (2 x 5% of 20 marks) subtracted from your awarded mark.
Extensions:
In extenuating circumstances, students may apply to the unit coordinator for an extension to the assessment due date. Reasons for the extension need to be documented through the Disruption to Studies form accessible through ask.mq.edu.au under "Disruption" and supported (e.g., a Professional Authority Form must be used in the case of illness). Note that:
IEC Academic Honesty Guidelines:
All assignments should cite and provide full bibliographical details of all material that you have used to inform or support your ideas. At the Institute of Early Childhood, students are required to use the American Psychological Association (APA) referencing procedures. Full details about how to cite and reference correctly can be found in Perrin (2015) and in the IEC Academic Honesty Handbook.
The following guide can be purchased from the Co-op Bookshop. This is a required text:
Perrin, R. (2015). Pocket guide to APA style (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Unit Grades
The final grade a student receives signifies their overall performance in meeting the learning outcomes for the unit. The number assigned to a grade (Standard Numerical Grade or SNG) reflects the extent to which student attainment matches the grade descriptors.
Your raw mark for the unit (i.e., the total of your marks for each assessment item) may not be the same as the SNG which you receive. Results may be scaled to ensure there is a degree of comparability across the university, so that units with the same past performances of their students should achieve similar results. The process of scaling does not change the order of marks among students. A student who receives a higher raw score mark than another will also receive a higher final scaled mark.
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Assignment 1 | 20% | 24 March (Week 4) |
Assignment 2 | 30% | 13 May 2016 (Week 9) |
Assignment 3 | 50% | 17 June 2016 |
Due: 24 March (Week 4)
Weighting: 20%
Professional reflection based on your personal experience of outdoor environments as a child. In this reflection, you will consider your own experiences in relation to contemporary issues (with reference to relevant literature) impacting on children’s outdoor play
Due: 13 May 2016 (Week 9)
Weighting: 30%
Evaluating provisions for science learning in the outdoor environment.
Due: 17 June 2016
Weighting: 50%
Planning for outdoor learning: Design an outdoor learning space for infants, toddlers & preschool aged children.
Students in this unit should read this unit guide carefully at the start of semester. It contains important information about the unit. If anything in it is unclear, please consult the Unit Coordinator.
IEC Relevant Documents
The information in this Unit Guide must be read in conjunction with the following documents available for download from iLearn:
IEC Electronic Communication
During semester time, staff may contact students using the following ways:
It is the student’s responsibility to check all electronic communication on a regular weekly basis.
Learning and Teaching Methods
The unit is offered in external mode. A compulsory on campus day will be held on Tuesday 19 April. Content in this unit will be delivered using a combination of pre-recorded lectures, required readings and individual study tasks.
IEC Unit Expectations
Required Readings:
Week 1: Historical and contemporary approaches; Theoretical Approaches
Tovey, H. (2014). Outdoor play and the early years tradition. In T. Maynard & J. Waters (Eds), Exploring outdoor play in the early years (Chapter, 1, pp. 16-28). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Sandseter, E.B.H., Little, H. & Wyver, S. (2012). Do theory and pedagogy have an impact on provisions for outdoor learning? A comparison of approaches in Australia and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 167-182. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2012.699800
Week 2: Contemporary issues
Waller, T., Sandseter, E.B.H., Wyver, S., Ärlemalm‐Hagsérd, E., & Maynard, T. (2010). The dynamics of early childhood spaces: opportunities for outdoor play? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 437-443. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2010.525917
Week 3: Regulatory context of outdoor learning environments
Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority [ACECQA]. (2011). Guide to the National Quality Standard. http://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF03-Guide-to-NQS-130902.pdf
Australian Government Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra: DEEWR. http://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf
Cummins, E & Reedy, A. (2015). Getting the balance right. Risk management for play. Melbourne: Play Australia. (Part B, excerpts)
Week 4: Natural playspaces
Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24-35.
Week 5: Playing outside; Outdoor environments for infants and toddlers
Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor play: Does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 33-40.
Huggins, V., & Wickett, K. (2011). Crawling and toddling in the outdoors: very young children’s learning. In S. Waite (Ed), Children learning outside the classroom. From birth to eleven (Chapter 2, pp. 20-34). London: Sage.
Week 6: Managing risk in play
Cummins, E & Reedy, A. (2015). Getting the balance right. Risk management for play. Melbourne: Play Australia. (Part A, excerpts)
Week 7: Thinking outdoors
Petriwskyj, A. (2013). Science. In D. Pendergast & S. Garvis (Eds), Teaching early years: curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Chapter 7, pp. 107-124). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Luken, E., Carr, V., & Brown, R. (2011). Playscapes: Designs for play, exploration and science inquiry. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2), 325-337. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.21.2.0325
Week 8: Sustainable practice and environmental responsibility
Elliott, S. (2014). Sustainability and the Early Years Learning Framework (Chapter 3). Sydney: Pademelon Press.
Week 9: Creative play
TBC
Week 10: Physically active play
Archer, C., & Siraj, I. (2015). Encouraging physical development through movement play (Chapter 3). London: Sage.
Week 11: Environments beyond the gate
Elliott, S., & Chancellor, B. (2014). From forest preschool to Bush Kinder: An inspirational approach to preschool provision in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 45-53.
Week 12: Relationships based learning and teaching
Lofdahl, A. (2010). Who gets to play? Peer groups, power and play in early childhood settings. In L. Brooker & S Edwards (Eds.) Engaging play (Chapter 9, pp.-122- 135). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Week 13: Supporting participation and inclusion
Jeavons, M. (2008). Making natural playspaces more accessible to children with disabilities. In S. Elliott (Ed.), The outdoor playspace naturally for children birth to five years (Chapter 6). Sydney: Pademelon Press.
|
Week |
Topic |
Topic |
Lecturer |
Reading |
Module 1: Approaches to outdoor learning
|
1
29 Feb |
1 |
Historical and contemporary approaches to outdoor learning environments |
Helen Little
|
Tovey (2014) |
2 |
Theoretical perspectives
|
Helen Little
|
Sandseter, Little, & Wyver (2012 |
||
2
7 Mar |
3 |
Contemporary issues
|
Helen Little
|
Waller, T., et al. (2010). |
|
3
14 Mar |
4
|
The regulatory context of outdoor learning environments
|
Helen Little
|
EYLF & NQS
Cummins & Reedy (2015) |
|
Module 2: Outdoor environments as pedagogical spaces
|
3
14 Mar |
5 |
Features of effective outdoor environments
|
Luke Touhill |
|
4 21 Mar |
6 |
Natural playspaces
|
Helen Little
|
Dowdell, Gray, & Malone (2011). |
|
5
28 Mar |
7 |
Playing outside
|
Helen Little
|
Little & Wyver (2008) |
|
9 |
Outdoor environments for infants and toddlers |
Sheila Degotardi
|
Huggins, & Wickett (2011) |
||
10 |
Outdoor environments for pre-schoolers |
Luke Touhill
|
|
||
6
4 Apr |
11 |
Managing risk in play
|
Helen Little
|
Cummins & Reedy (2015) |
|
Module 3: Discovery in outdoor environments
|
7
25 Apr |
12 |
Thinking outdoors
|
Luke Touhill |
Petriwskyj (2013)
Luken, Carr & Brown (2011) |
8
2 May |
13 |
Sustainable practice and environmental responsibility
|
Helen Little
|
Elliott (2014) |
|
9
9 May |
14 |
Creative play
|
Luke Touhill |
|
|
|
10
16 May |
15 |
Physically active play
|
Helen Little
|
Archer & Siraj (2015) |
11
23 May |
16 |
Environments beyond the gate
|
Helen Little
|
Elliott & Chancellor (2014) |
|
Module 4: Relationships-based learning |
12
30 May |
17 |
Relationships based learning and teaching
|
Helen Little
|
Lofdahl (2010) |
|
13
6 June |
18 |
Who can play? Supporting participation and inclusion
|
Helen Little |
Jeavons (2008) |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
New Assessment Policy in effect from Session 2 2016 http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy_2016.html. For more information visit http://students.mq.edu.au/events/2016/07/19/new_assessment_policy_in_place_from_session_2/
Assessment Policy prior to Session 2 2016 http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy prior to Session 2 2016 http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Complaint Management Procedure for Students and Members of the Public http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/complaint_management/procedure.html
Disruption to Studies Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html The Disruption to Studies Policy is effective from March 3 2014 and replaces the Special Consideration Policy.
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will have enquiring minds and a literate curiosity which will lead them to pursue knowledge for its own sake. They will continue to pursue learning in their careers and as they participate in the world. They will be capable of reflecting on their experiences and relationships with others and the environment, learning from them, and growing - personally, professionally and socially.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be aware of and have respect for self and others; to be able to work with others as a leader and a team player; to have a sense of connectedness with others and country; and to have a sense of mutual obligation. Our graduates should be informed and active participants in moving society towards sustainability.
This graduate capability is supported by: