Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Convenor
Florence Chiew
C5C 314
By appointment
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
4
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
Admission to MRes and 4cp at 700 level
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit explores the ways in which our disciplinary mindsets, habits and practices shape how we relate and communicate with other researchers. We will consider why and how we conform to certain academic conventions of style in our disciplines and the impact this has on our perception of ourselves as scholars. In doing so, we confront a central issue in research communication practices: If our disciplinary training shapes how we think, read, write and speak to each other, how can a person from one discipline understand someone from a different background? What do we need to translate complex findings and discipline-specific concepts into a language, format and context that non-experts can understand? Why and to whom does this matter? The course will debate these questions and discuss strategies for engaging with wider and non-specialist audiences. As effective communication relies on responsible communication, we will also pay close attention to the ethical dilemmas that can emerge from the research encounter, and through this deepen our appreciation of research integrity and responsibility.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Applying for an extension
To request an extension for an assignment, students should submit a Disruption to Studies Notification within 5 working days of the commencement of the disruption. The Disruption to Studies Notification must be submitted online through www.ask.mq.edu.au. Information on what constitutes a disruption and how to apply for an extension can be found on the MQ students' Disruption to Studies webpage.
Students with a pre-existing disability/health condition or prolonged adverse circumstances may be eligible for ongoing assistance and support. Such support is governed by other policies and may be sought and coordinated through Campus Wellbeing and Support Services.
Late submissions
Unless an extension is granted, work that is submitted after the due date will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks for each week it is overdue (i.e. -10% for 1-6 days late; -20% for 7-13 days late; -30% for 14-20 days late). Work submitted more than 20 days late will not be accepted.
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Critical reflection | 30% | No | Week 4 and 11 |
Research pitch | 30% | No | Week 7 |
Oral/Poster Presentation | 20% | No | Weeks 11-13 |
Class participation | 20% | No | Assessed throughout semester |
Due: Week 4 and 11
Weighting: 30%
Initial Task, due in Week 4, 500 words
Pick one theme or issue covered in the topic or readings in Weeks 2, 3 and 4. In your critical reflection, explore why this particular theme or issue interests you. Use the corresponding weekly questions and prompts as a guide. Your response should aim to strike a balance between your personal perspective and the requirements of good academic practice and rigorous thinking. This means:
A strong critical reflection demonstrates that you have comprehensively explored the relationship between your own experience/practice and the course theme in question.
Second Task, due in Week 11, 800 words
Base this critical reflection on one or more 3 Minute Thesis (3MT) presentations that you attended. You may also want to reflect on the 3MT event as a whole. Draw out your analysis by making use of specific readings and course themes. What does the 3MT say about research communication in the 21st century? How does it relate to your understanding or experience of research culture? As with the initial task, your response should do more than describe the 3MT talks you attended. Emphasise the connections between some of the issues covered in the course and contemporary academic communication strategies/platforms.
Due: Week 7
Weighting: 30%
There are two parts to this assignment.
Step 1
Imagine you need to explain your research interest to a panel of non-experts, and to convince them of its significance. This panel will consist of:
Give an overview of your area of research interest in language that is accessible to this diverse audience. Explain the idea, problem or question you are interested in, and highlight its significance. Aim for about 1000 words.
Step 2
Organise yourself into a pair (or a group of 3) with another student/s. You will have time to do this in your tutorial.
Bear in mind that while there are advantages to working with someone from your discipline or who knows your topic area well, there are also advantages in having input from someone outside your field. You may well be surprised by how useful it is to have a reader who isn’t from your discipline.
Once you have partnered or teamed up, you need to swap a current version of your draft (activity in Step 1) with each other. You will give feedback to your partner or group member on their piece of writing. You will also receive feedback from your partner or group member on your piece of writing. Remember, this is only a draft at this stage; the writing does not need to be polished.
Due: Weeks 11-13
Weighting: 20%
Presentations will run in tutorials between Weeks 11 and 13.
Prepare an oral or a poster presentation on a theory, concept or debate in your field. This can relate to your thesis topic but should not be a repetition of your research pitch (assignment 2). Your audience is your tutorial group. Remember that not all your classmates are from your discipline or faculty, so please prepare a presentation in language that is accessible to an intelligent but non-specialist audience.
In your presentation, you will need to explain why you are interested in this theory, concept or debate, and draw out its broader significance. You have 5 minutes to give your presentation. Be prepared to answer questions about your talk from your tutor/classmates.
Due: Assessed throughout semester
Weighting: 20%
Participation in this unit is based on consistent tutorial attendance and participation, active and thoughtful engagement with readings, course content and online discussion forums on iLearn.
MRES700 is delivered as follows:
Students will be automatically enrolled into the online MRES700 iLearn unit. This unit enables students to receive announcements, download and submit assignments, access lecture recordings, handouts and slides, and participate in online discussion forums. Readings will be available for download via the iLearn site.
Week |
Lecture |
Tutorial Schedule |
1 31/7-4/8 |
Introduction: research and communication |
No tutorials |
2 7/8-11/8 |
Academic communication: Writing and disciplinary identity
|
Tutorials begin |
3 14/8-18/8 |
Academic communication: Explaining complex concepts
|
|
4 21/8-25/8 |
Academic culture: Dialogue and feedback |
Initial critical reflective task due -Form peer writing groups |
5 28/8-1/9 |
Academic culture: Slowness in the research process |
- Peer review session
|
6 4/9-8/9 |
Academic culture: Confidence and ignorance
|
- Peer review session
|
7 11/9-15/9 |
Research ethics and integrity (with indigenous methodologies and perspectives)
|
Research pitch due |
|
Recess
|
Monday September 18: Macquarie University 3MT Finals 1.30-3.30pm, Macquarie Theatre
|
|
Recess
|
|
8 2/10-6/10 |
No lecture |
Workshops (except Monday Oct 2, labour day public hol)
|
9 9/10-13/10 |
No lecture
|
Workshops |
10 16/10-20/10 |
Lecture on oral/poster presentations
|
Workshops |
11 23/10-27/10 |
Working routines
|
Tutorial presentations begin Second critical reflective assignment due |
12 30/10-3/11 |
Concluding lecture and student panel discussion
|
Tutorial presentations |
13 6/11-10/11 |
No lecture
|
Tutorial presentations |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy_2016.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Complaint Management Procedure for Students and Members of the Public http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/complaint_management/procedure.html
Disruption to Studies Policy (in effect until Dec 4th, 2017): http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html
Special Consideration Policy (in effect from Dec 4th, 2017): https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policies/special-consideration
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our postgraduates will demonstrate a high standard of discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgment. They will have the ability to make informed choices and decisions that reflect both the nature of their professional work and their personal perspectives.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be able to demonstrate a significantly enhanced depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content knowledge in their chosen fields.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of utilising and reflecting on prior knowledge and experience, of applying higher level critical thinking skills, and of integrating and synthesising learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments. A characteristic of this form of thinking is the generation of new, professionally oriented knowledge through personal or group-based critique of practice and theory.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of systematic enquiry; able to use research skills to create new knowledge that can be applied to real world issues, or contribute to a field of study or practice to enhance society. They will be capable of creative questioning, problem finding and problem solving.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be able to communicate effectively and convey their views to different social, cultural, and professional audiences. They will be able to use a variety of technologically supported media to communicate with empathy using a range of written, spoken or visual formats.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be ethically aware and capable of confident transformative action in relation to their professional responsibilities and the wider community. They will have a sense of connectedness with others and country and have a sense of mutual obligation. They will be able to appreciate the impact of their professional roles for social justice and inclusion related to national and global issues
This graduate capability is supported by: