Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Unit Convenor / Lecturer
Stephen Reid
Contact via Email
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
2
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
(Admission to MAppFin or GradDipAppFin) and ECFS866
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit will give students a taste of the range of assignments encountered in a career in valuations. The course will be equally useful for those who might commission or use valuations such as company directors, chief financial officers, company secretaries, corporate advisors and equity analysts. The course will equip students to value portfolio and controlling interests in both public and private companies. We will also examine the specific nuances of performing valuations for mergers and acquisitions vs independent expert’s reports vs financial reporting vs taxation purposes. The course starts with an overview of the Australian and international standards and regulations that apply to valuations in Australia. We then examine the most common circumstances that give rise to the need for a valuation. Finally, we look at what is involved in giving expert evidence in court. A mock-trial setting is used to test the theory covered in class. The objective of this unit is to build on these valuation skills from Corporate Finance, and present new theory in a practical way through discussion and analysis of case studies that represent real-life situations. Students will have access to S&P Capital IQ.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
To pass this unit (requires a Mark of 50 or better) the student must pass the final examination.
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Pre-Unit Quiz | 10% | No | Before first class |
Assignment | 30% | No | Refer to iLearn |
In Class Participation | 10% | No | Ongoing |
Final Exam | 50% | Yes | Refer to Timetable |
Due: Before first class
Weighting: 10%
Summary of Assessment Task
Individual / Group: Individual
Due Date: Before first class
Grading Method: Refer to 'Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily' section
Submission Method: In iLearn
Duration: Refer to iLearn
Extension Requests:
Due: Refer to iLearn
Weighting: 30%
Summary of Assessment Task
Individual / Group: Individual. (Group discussion allowed before submission)
Due Date: Refer to the Unit's iLearn site
Grading Method: Refer to 'Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily' section
Submission Method: Online via Turnitin on iLearn site
Duration: Refer to Assignment Coversheet
Extension Requests:
Due: Ongoing
Weighting: 10%
Summary of Assessment Task
Individual / Group: Attendance, group & individual presentation, and participation in class discussion
Due Date: Refer to the Unit's iLearn site
Grading Method: Refer to 'Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily' section
Submission Method: In-class
Duration: Ongoing
Due: Refer to Timetable
Weighting: 50%
This is a hurdle assessment task (see assessment policy for more information on hurdle assessment tasks)
Summary of Assessment Task
Individual / Group: Individual
Due Date: Refer to Timetable.
Grading Method: Refer to 'Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily' section
Submission Method: As per MAFC Program Rules & Procedures at www.mafc.mq.edu.au
Duration: 2 hours plus 10 minutes reading time
Examination Conditions:
Extension Requests:
Face-to-Face Teaching: Generally 20 hours.
Timetable: Detailed timetable for classes are on the Centre’s web site www.mafc.mq.edu.au
Consultation Times:
Students who wish to contact any of the teaching staff may do so through:
Text: Nil
Additional Readings:
Lecture Notes: Available in printed form and electronically via iLearn.
Useful References: Will be provided as part of the notes
Calculators:
Assumed Knowledge:
Assumed Access:
Unit iLearn Site:
Important Notice:
We start by looking at the regulatory environment for valuations in Australia. By considering each of the main regulators in turn, we will look at the circumstances where a valuation may be subject to regulation and the different valuation approaches that are prescribed by each regulator.
Key learning outcomes:
We review some of the nuances of valuing private companies as opposed to public companies - where information is much more difficult to obtain and generally not of the same quality. We also look at how to deal with the additional risks typically inherent in private companies.
Key learning outcomes:
We look at the key differences between portfolio interests and controlling interests in companies, and how we account for the differences in value. We also consider empirical evidence on control premiums paid in takeover transactions.
Key learning outcomes:
We discuss valuations in a merger and acquisition context – where they fit into the process and how they might impact on due diligence and the ultimate deal structure.
Key learning outcomes:
We will discuss the circumstances in which it is advisable to commission Independent Expert’s Reports and review the key requirements of preparing Independent Expert’s Reports. We will review various examples of past Independent Expert’s Reports and undertake an in-depth group case study of a few Independent Expert’s Report.
Key learning outcomes:
6. VALUATIONS FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
We will discuss the importance of valuations in the context of the global move towards fair value reporting and look at examples of accounting standards that provide specific valuation guidance. We will look at public company annual reports as an example of how valuation information in respect of key balance sheet and income statement items is disclosed.
Key learning outcomes:
We will discuss the importance of valuations in tax compliance and review a range of scenarios that may require valuations such as tax restructures, divestments, tax consolidations and employee share schemes. We will look at the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) Market Valuation Guidelines on how valuations for taxation purposes should be performed.
Key learning outcomes:
We will look at some of the circumstances that may require a valuer to provide a written expert report for Court or give oral evidence in Court, and practically how these things are done.
Key learning outcomes:
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy_2016.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Complaint Management Procedure for Students and Members of the Public http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/complaint_management/procedure.html
Disruption to Studies Policy (in effect until Dec 4th, 2017): http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/disruption_studies/policy.html
Special Consideration Policy (in effect from Dec 4th, 2017): https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policies/special-consideration
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/student_conduct/
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Students should also consult the MAFC Program Rules & Procedures found at http://www.mafc.mq.edu.au
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
For all student enquiries, please contact studentsupport@mafc.mq.edu.au
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
Learning Skills (http://www.students.mq.edu.au/support/learning_skills/) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our postgraduates will demonstrate a high standard of discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgment. They will have the ability to make informed choices and decisions that reflect both the nature of their professional work and their personal perspectives.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of utilising and reflecting on prior knowledge and experience, of applying higher level critical thinking skills, and of integrating and synthesising learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments. A characteristic of this form of thinking is the generation of new, professionally oriented knowledge through personal or group-based critique of practice and theory.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of systematic enquiry; able to use research skills to create new knowledge that can be applied to real world issues, or contribute to a field of study or practice to enhance society. They will be capable of creative questioning, problem finding and problem solving.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be ethically aware and capable of confident transformative action in relation to their professional responsibilities and the wider community. They will have a sense of connectedness with others and country and have a sense of mutual obligation. They will be able to appreciate the impact of their professional roles for social justice and inclusion related to national and global issues
This graduate capability is supported by:
The Assessment Tasks and Standards Required to Complete the Unit Satisfactorily sections were updated in September 2017.
This unit guide may be subject to change. The latest version is on the Centre’s web site www.mafc.mq.edu.au/
Students should read the unit guide carefully at the start of term. It contains important information about the unit. If anything is unclear, please consult unit lecturer.
University Policy on Grading:
Specific Unit Grading:
Grade | Expectation |
---|---|
High Distinction | Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline. |
Distinction | Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. |
Credit | Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline. |
Pass | Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes. |
Fail | Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline. |
Fail Hurdle | Student has obtained a raw mark over 50, yet failed all available attempts of at least one hurdle assessment. |
Review of Grade and final examination Script viewing: