Notice
As part of Phase 3 of our return to campus plan, most units will now run tutorials, seminars and other small group learning activities on campus for the second half-year, while keeping an online version available for those students unable to return or those who choose to continue their studies online.
To check the availability of face to face activities for your unit, please go to timetable viewer. To check detailed information on unit assessments visit your unit's iLearn space or consult your unit convenor.
Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Unit Convenor
Malcolm Choat
Contact via malcolm.choat@mq.edu.au
By Appointment
Convener
Elizabeth Agaiby
Elizabeth Agaiby
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
10
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
Admission to GradCertAncHist (OUA)
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
A detailed study of monasticism in Egypt based on documentary papyri and inscriptions in Greek and Coptic (studied in English translation). A number of key cases studies will be examined, including Melitian monasticism, and the monasteries of Bawit, Bala'izah, and western Thebes.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Guidelines on the criteria and standards required for assessment tasks, as well as rubrics where appropriate, will be placed on the iLearn site. Marks given for individual items of assessment are indicative only; final marks will be determined after moderation.
ALL written assignments must be submitted via Turnitin within iLearn.
ALL deadlines are firm unless an extension has been requested in writing one (1) week before the due date. All requests for extensions must be submitted via ask.mq.edu.au and be supported by appropriate documentation. A penalty for lateness (see below) will apply unless a medical certificate or other written substantiation is supplied. Assignments handed in early will not be marked and returned before the due date. Always retain a copy of work you submit in case it is lost in the online system.
Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, (a) a penalty for lateness will apply – two (2) marks out of 100* will be deducted per day for assignments submitted after the due date – and (b) no assignment will be accepted more than seven (7) days (incl. weekends) after the original submission deadline. No late submissions will be accepted for timed assessments – e.g. quizzes, online tests.
*"100" is to be understood as 100% of the marks for that task, not the entire unit.
In order to complete this unit satisfactorily students must gain a mark of 50% or more, and attempt all assessment tasks.
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Encyclopaedia Assessment | 20% | No | Friday Week 3 |
Short Paper | 30% | No | Friday Week 7 |
Short notes on major figures | 10% | No | Throughout Session |
Major Essay | 40% | No | Friday Week 11 |
Assessment Type 1: Essay
Indicative Time on Task 2: 15 hours
Due: Friday Week 3
Weighting: 20%
Students compare and assess two Encyclopaedia entries on monasticism.
Assessment Type 1: Essay
Indicative Time on Task 2: 22 hours
Due: Friday Week 7
Weighting: 30%
Students write a 1000 word paper on one of a choice of topics
Assessment Type 1: Participatory task
Indicative Time on Task 2: 5 hours
Due: Throughout Session
Weighting: 10%
Students write five 100-word summaries of the sources for major monastic figures adressed during in the unit. Two will be chosen at random and marked out of 5% each.
Assessment Type 1: Essay
Indicative Time on Task 2: 30 hours
Due: Friday Week 11
Weighting: 40%
Students write a 2500 word essay on one of a choice of topics
1 If you need help with your assignment, please contact:
2 Indicative time-on-task is an estimate of the time required for completion of the assessment task and is subject to individual variation
Weekly readings will be available via the Macquarie University Library website, or on the iLearn site. There is considerable material available on the internet on the subject, notably The Coptic Encyclopedia, now online in its entirety at http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cce
All readings set from the Coptic Encyclopedia can be accessed there by searching for them by title.
This unit uses the iLearn, echo360, and Leganto and Multisearch systems to deliver lecture content and readings.
Week 1
|
Lecture: Asceticism and Monasticism in the Ancient World Discussion: Introductory. |
Week 2
|
Lecture: Antony and his Life Discussion: The Life of Antony |
Week 3
|
Lecture: The Desert Fathers Discussion: Apophthegmata Patrum |
Week 4
|
Lecture: Communal monasticism I: Pachomius Discussion: The Lives of Pachomius |
Week 5
|
Lecture: Communal monasticism I: Shenoute Discussion: Shenoute and Besa |
Week 6
|
Lecture: Monasticism in the papyri Discussion: Monastic Papyri |
Week 7 |
No Lecture or Discussion |
|
Mid Semester Break (two weeks) |
Week 8
|
Lecture: Female Monasticism Discussion: Female Monasticism |
Week 9
|
Lecture: Eremitic and Cenobitic communities I Discussion: Theban monks |
Week 10
|
Lecture: Eremitic and Cenobitic communities II Discussion: The Dayr al-Bala’yzah and Monastery of Jeremiah |
Week 11
|
Lecture: Monasticism in Syria and Palestine Discussion: The Life of Hilarion |
Week 12
|
Lecture: The Legacy of Egyptian Monasticism: The West Discussion: Palladius and Cassian |
Week 13
|
Lecture: Retrospect Discussion: Overview Discussion |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Students seeking more policy resources can visit the Student Policy Gateway (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/student-policy-gateway). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
If you would like to see all the policies relevant to Learning and Teaching visit Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central).
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/getting-started/student-conduct
Results published on platform other than eStudent, (eg. iLearn, Coursera etc.) or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au or if you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
Extensions will be granted only in documented cases of misadventure or illness. Assessment submitted after the due date without a medical certificate or reasonable explanation will attract a penalty of 2% of their mark for every day they are late. Requests for extensions must be made before the due date in writing. (Note the last point: requests for extensions will not be granted over the phone or in person).
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to help you improve your marks and take control of your study.
The Library provides online and face to face support to help you find and use relevant information resources.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
If you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Since the last time this unit was offered, some of the lecture content and the order of lectures has been revised.
To compete the unit satisfactorily, students must listen to the lectures and reflect on them, do the set weekly reading(s), and participate in the online discussion in a manner which demonstrates they have done these things. They must submit all items of assessment, and hand in work which is formatted in accordance with Department of Ancient History guidelines (available here), spell-checked, written in good English, and which demonstrates an understanding of the material in the lectures and readings, and independent reflection on the subject of the assessment. Assessments must demonstrate the generic skills below, which will be assessed according to the listed criteria and levels of achievements.
KNOWLEDGE APPROACH & ARGUMENT |
HIGH DISTINCTION |
DISTINCTION |
CREDIT |
PASS |
FAIL |
Knowledge of relevant subject matter | Extensive knowledge of relevent subject matter | Thorough knowledge of relevant subject matter | Substantial knowledge of relevant subject matter | Sound knowledge of relevant subject matter | Little or no knowledge of relevant subject matter |
Mastery of appropriate techniques and methodologies | Mastery of appropriate techniques and methodologies | Thorough application of techniques and methodologies | Substantial evidence of knowledge of appropriate techniques and methodologies | Some evidence of knowledge of appropriate techniques and methodologies | Little or nor evidence of knowledge of appropriate techniques and methodologies |
Your argument | Consistent evidence of deep and critical thinking; substantial originality | Clear evidence of deep and critical thinking | Some evidence of deep and critical thinking | Sufficient evidence of some critical thinking | Little or no evidence of critical thinking |
Competing arguments | Competing arguments mastered; some success in attempting to go beyond scholarship | Competing arguments mastered; attempt to go beyond scholarship | Substantial evidence of knowledge of competing arguments; arguments reported rather than analysed | Some evidence of knowledge of competing arguments, but this not integrated into your argument | No evidence of knowledge of competing arguments |
SOURCES & THEIR USE |
HIGH DISTINCTION |
DISTINCTION |
CREDIT |
PASS |
FAIL |
Use of ancient sources | Extensive and critical use of ancient sources | Thorough and critical use of ancient sources | Substantial use of ancient sources; some uncritical use | Sufficient use of ancient sources; substantial uncritical use | Very little or no use of ancient sources |
Use of modern scholarship | Extensive and critical use of modern scholarship | Thorough and critical use of modern scholarship | Substantial use of modern scholarship; some uncritical use | Sufficient use of modern scholarship; substantial uncritical use | Little or no use of modern scholarship; uncritical use |
Citation of sources | Approved system used consistently | Approved system used consistently | Approved system used consistently | Approved system used, but not used consistently | No attempt to use approved system or no citation [plagiarism] |
STYLE, PRESENTATION AND LANGUAGE |
HIGH DISTINCTION |
DISTINCTION |
CREDIT |
PASS |
FAIL |
English language: Grammar | Excellent use of English language throughout | Excellent use of English language throughout | Proficient use of English; some minor errors eg in use of apostrophe | Generally sound use of English; consistent minor errors | Substantial inappropriate or ungrammatical use of English |
English language: Spelling | Spelling correct throughout | Spelling correct throughout | Spelling mostly correct throughout; some inconsistency eg in treatment of foreign language words in English | Minor spelling mistakes but otherwise sound | Spelling poor |
Structure of argument | Argument structure excellent | Argument well structured | Argument has proficient structure | Argument has clear structure | Little or no structure to argument |
Length of paper | Within limits set for this assignment | Within limits set for this assignment | Within limits set for this assignment | Within limits set for this assignment | Not within limits set for this assignment |
Presentation | Well presented | Well presented | Well presented | Well presented | Poor presentation: eg untidy and difficult to read |