Assessment Presentation and Submission Guidelines 

Please follow these guidelines when you submit each assignment: 

• Allow a left and right-hand margin of at least 2cm in all assignments. 

• Please type all assignments using 12-point font and 1.5 spacing. 

• All assessments must be submitted through Turnitin in .doc or .pdf format  

• It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that all assessments are successfully submitted through Turnitin. 

• Faculty assignment cover sheets are NOT required. (In fact, they just create more scrolling for markers using Turnitin, so please don't use them in EDST8208.)

 

Draft Submissions & Turnitin Originality Reports 

• Students may use Turnitin’s Originality Report as a learning tool to improve their academic writing if this option is made available in the unit. 

• Students are strongly encouraged to upload a draft copy of each assessment to Turnitin at least one week prior to the due date to obtain an Originality Report. 

• The Originality Report provides students with a similarity index that may indicate if plagiarism has occurred. Students will be able to make amendments to their drafts prior to their final submission on the due date. 

• Generally, one Originality Report is generated every 24 hours up to the due date. 

 

Please note: 

• Students should regularly save a copy of all assignments before submission.

• Students are responsible for checking that their submission has been successful and has been submitted by the due date and time. 

 

Assignment extensions and late penalties 

• In general, there should be no need for extensions except through illness or misadventure that would be categorised as serious and unavoidable disruption according to the University definition of same, see:  https://students.mq.edu.au/study/my-study-program/special-consideration 

• Applications for extensions must be made via AskMQ according to the Special Consideration policy. Extensions can only be granted if they meet the Special Considerations policy and are submitted via https://ask.mq.edu.au/. This will ensure consistency in the consideration of such requests is maintained.  

• Late submissions: Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, (a) a penalty for lateness will apply - 10/100 marks of credit (10% of the total assessment weighting) will be deducted per day for assignments submitted after the due date – and (b) no assignment will be accepted seven days (incl. weekends) after the original submission deadline. No late submissions will be accepted for timed assessment - e.g., quizzes, online tests. A zero result for the assignment will be recorded after the late submission period has ended if no task has been received.

• If a student is still permitted to submit on the basis of unavoidable disruption, an alternative topic may be set.  

• Students should keep an electronic file of all assessments. Claims regarding "lost" assessments cannot be made if the file cannot be produced. It is also advisable to keep an electronic file of all drafts and the final submission on a USB untouched/unopened after submission. This can be used to demonstrate easily that the assessment has not been amended after the submission date.

 

Requesting a re-assessment of an assignment 

If you have evidence that your task has been incorrectly assessed against the grade descriptors you can request a re-mark. To request a re-mark you need to contact the unit convenor within 7 days of the date of return of the assignment and provide a detailed assessment of your script against the task criteria. Evidence from your assignment must be provided to support your judgements.  

Note: 

• Please do not request a re-mark for a Failed assessment as they are all double-marked as a part of the moderation process.  

• The outcome of a re-mark may be a higher/lower or unchanged grade.  

• Grades are standards referenced and effort is NOT a criterion.  

 

University policy on grading 

Criteria for awarding grades for assessment tasks 

Assignments will be awarded grades ranging from HD to F according to guidelines set out in the University's Grading Policy. The following descriptive criteria are included for your information. 

 

Descriptive Criteria for awarding grades in the unit 

In order to meet the unit outcomes and successfully pass this unit, students must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks. Where any submitted assessment task is considered to be unsatisfactory in this regard, the highest possible final grade that can be awarded for the unit will be 45.

 

Students will be awarded grades ranging from HD to F according to guidelines set out in the assessment policy: https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policies/assessment-in-effect-from-session-2-2016 

The following generic grade descriptors provide university-wide standards for awarding final grades. 

Grade	Descriptor
HD  (High Distinction)	Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline.
D  (Distinction)	Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.
Cr  (Credit)	Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline.
P  (Pass)	Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes
F  (Fail)	Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

Note: If you fail a unit with a professional experience component the fail grade will be on your transcript irrespective of the timing of the placement. 

 

Withdrawing from this Unit 

If you are considering withdrawing from this unit, please seek academic advice via https://ask.mq.edu.au before doing so as this unit may be a co-requisite or prerequisite for units in the following sessions and may impact on your progression through the degree. 

 

Results 

Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au. 

 

Prescribed and recommended readings

Compulsory Text:

Derewianka, B & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context (2^nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Some literary texts for children will also be set as compulsory readings, and advised on iLearn.

Highly recommended text: 

Thomas, D., & Thomas, A. (Eds.) (2021). Teaching and learning Primary English. Oxford University Press.

Recommended additional texts:

Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2^nd ed.). The Guildford Press.

Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E.J., Slocum, T.A., & Travers, P.A. (2017). Direct instruction reading (6^th ed.) Pearson. [Chapter 21: Direct instruction in content area reading, pp. 234–275]

Cremin, T. (2015). Teaching English creatively (2^nd ed.). Routledge.

Derewianka, B. (2020). Exploring how texts work (2^nd ed.). Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E.J., Slocum, T.A., & Travers, P. (2017). Direct Instruction Reading (6th ed.) (pp. 234-275: Chapter 21: Direct Instruction in Content Area Reading). Pearson. 

Cremin, T. (2015). Teaching English creatively. London & New York: Routledge.

Flint, A.S., Kitson, L., Lowe, K., Shaw, K., Humphrey, S., Vicars, M., Rogers, J., & Ware, S. (2020). Literacy in Australia: Pedagogies for engagement (3^rd ed.). Pearson.

Graham, S., MacArthur, C.A., & Fitzgerald, J. (2013). Best practices in writing instruction. The Guildford Press. 

Graham, S., MacArthur, C.A., & Hebert, M. (eds). (2018). Best practices in writing instruction (3^rd ed.). Guildford Press.

Hammond, J., & Miller, J. (Eds.) (2015). Classrooms of possibility: Supporting at-risk EAL students. Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

Harper, H., & Feez, S. (Eds.)(2021). An EAL/D Handbook: Teaching and learning across the curriculum when English is an additional language or dialect. PETAA.  

Henderson, R. (Ed.)(2019). Teaching literacies: Pedagogies and diversity (2nd edition). Oxford University Press. 

Humphrey, S., Droga, L., & Feez, S. (2012). Grammar and meaning (2^nd ed.). Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

Humphrey, S. & Vale, E. (2020) Investigating model texts for learning. Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

Johnston, R. R. (2017). Australian literature for young people. Oxford University Press, Australia. 

McDonald, L. (2017). A literature companion for teachers (2nd ed.). Primary English Teaching Association Australia.  

Milton, M. (Ed.) (2017). Inclusive principles and practices in literacy education. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Morgan, A-M., Comber, B., Freebody, P., Nixon, H. (2014). Literacy in the middle years: Learning from collaborative classroom research. Primary English Teaching Association Australia.

Richardson, J.S., Morgan, R.F, & Fleener, C.E. (2012). Reading to learn in the content areas (8^th edition). Cengage Learning.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.

Simpson, A., White, S., Freebody, P., & Comber, B. (2013). Language, literacy and literature. Oxford University Press.

Stuart, M., & Stainthorp, R. (2015). Reading development and teaching. SAGE.

Wing Jan, L. & Taylor, S. (2020). Write ways. (5^th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Wolsey, T.D. & Lapp, D. (2016). Literacy in the disciplines: A teacher’s guide for Grades 5 – 12. Guilford Press.

Zbaracki, M. (2015). Writing right with text types. Oxford University Press.

 

iLearn site

This unit has a full web presence through iLearn.   

Students will need regular access to a computer and the internet to complete this unit.  

Weekly access to iLearn is compulsory for all students. Important assessment information will be posted there, as will other relevant unit notices and materials. 

Various activities and materials for discussion and tutorial preparation will be provided. Electronic links and suggested references will be included in the Leganto section, which is linked to the library. Please check the iLearn site for the unit regularly.  

 

Lectures  

Lectures will be available on the web through the Echo360 component. You must listen to and view all lectures. PowerPoint slides will be available in the Echo360 section. You are encouraged to create your own notes, however, rather than only downloading slides.  

 

Access and technical assistance  

Information for students about access to the online component of this unit is available at https://ilearn.mq.edu.au/login/index.php. You will need to enter your student username and password. 

Please do NOT contact the Unit Convenor regarding iLearn technical help.  

No extensions will be given for any technical issues. Allow enough time for uploading your submissions.  

Assistance is available from IT Helpdesk ph: 1800 67 4357, or log a request at help.mq.edu.au. OneHelp is the online IT support service for both students and staff. 

 

This unit requires students to use several ICT and software skills: 

• Internet access: The iLearn site contains materials for this unit; it is also required for the online submission of all assessment tasks, and for the use of Turnitin submission for ALL tasks.   
• Word processing, visual representations, and document formatting: You are required to use an appropriate form of software to present your assignments.  
• Uploading of assessment tasks to iLearn. 

 

Structure 

The unit will be delivered using a combination of lectures and tutorials. There will be a weekly 1-hour lecture. All lectures will be recorded and available in Echo360. Weekly 2-hour tutorials/workshops will be held for 'weekday attendance' [internal] students, while 'infrequent attendance' [external] students will have two half-day on-campus sessions. All MTeach units include an option for students unable to attend campus. 

In tutorials and at the on-campus sessions (as relevant to their enrolment mode), students will discuss issues and questions arising from the lectures and prescribed readings. They are expected to base their arguments/discussions on evidence from published research and other relevant material. Students are required to participate in small group activities and whole class discussion, to read the weekly material in advance, and to complete brief tasks either as individuals or in pairs. Sometimes short 'homework' tasks will be set, which also need to be completed as tutorial preparation. The weekly program for the course with the accompanying readings/ preparation will be available on the unit iLearn site.

 

Module 1 Introduction: Language, literacy and children’s literature 

This module will provide an orientation to the unit, and revisit some of the key knowledge that students are expected to bring to this unit from earlier ones, with a focus on this knowledge as foundational for supporting students to engage with and create effective imaginative, persuasive and informative texts in Years 3-6. 

Module 2 Reading for learning and student engagement 

This module helps students understand the explicit teaching and assessment of reading comprehension appropriate to learners in Years 3-6. Based on research evidence related to teaching reading, students develop ability to design units of work and teaching plans that incorporate children’s literature alongside other quality multimodal texts and the effective use of literacy teaching strategies, including ICT that cater to learner diversity. 

Module 3 Writing in the later primary school years 

This module draws on research evidence about writing pedagogies to help students understand the explicit teaching of writing appropriate to the level of young learners. It also develops students’ knowledge of a range of resources and strategies, including ICT to support literacy learning and provide additional support to cater for student diversity. 

Module 4 English teaching for all capabilities and revision

This unit focuses on understanding the pervasive nature of literacy and its role in everyday situations, and the importance of home and community literacy practice. It will raise students’ awareness of specific strategies to cater for students of diverse abilities, including students with EALD (English as an Additional Language or Dialect). 

 

For further details, please refer to the iLearn site, where a unit schedule will be made available.