Submission of Assessments

All assessment pieces are to be submitted via Turnitin portals that will be made available the unit's iLearn site. Written assessment pieces will be run through the Turnitin software system which detects unoriginal work.

Special Consideration Extensions and Penalties

All work must be submitted on time unless an extension has been granted. Requests for extensions must be made in writing and will only be considered on serious grounds. Extensions will not be given unless good reasons and appropriate evidence (e.g., medical certificates, counsellor's letters) are presented at the earliest opportunity. Please note that work due concurrently in other subjects is NOT an exceptional circumstance and does not constitute a legitimate reason for an extension.  

Late Assessment Penalty

Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, (a) a penalty for lateness will apply – 10 marks out of 100 credit will be deducted per day for assignments submitted after the due date – and (b) no assignment will be accepted seven days (including weekends) after the original submission deadline.

Special Consideration Policy

The University classifies a disruption warranting special consideration as serious and unavoidable if it:

• could not have reasonably been anticipated, avoided or guarded against by the student; and

• was beyond the student's control; and

• caused substantial disruption to the student's capacity for effective study and/or completion of required work; and

• occurred during an event critical study period and was at least three (3) consecutive days duration, and / or

• prevented completion of a final examination. Students with a pre-existing disability/health condition or prolonged adverse circumstances may be eligible for ongoing assistance and support. Such support is governed by other policies and may be sought and coordinated through Campus Wellbeing and Support Services.

How to submit a Special Consideration Notification

A Special Consideration Notification must be completed and submitted online through www.ask.mq.edu.au within five (5) working days of the commencement of the disruption. Applying for Special Consideration: 1. Log in at ask.mq 2. Click 'Special Consideration' from the 'Submit' menu on the left 3. Fill in the required fields as prompted. Once you have completed filling out the information, please click on 'Submit'.  

This unit uses an iLearn website and Echo360 lecture recordings (https://ilearn.mq.edu.au/login/ MQ/). The website contains links to the reading material, lecture notes, lecture recordings, and other learning materials such as video clips, weblinks, and images. Students will therefore require access to a computer and a good internet connection in order to access all the material and participate in the unit effectively. PHIX3052 will be delivered using a combination of recorded lectures (via Echo360) and online tutorial forum discussions. Lectures are organised around key texts in which fundamental concepts and arguments are introduced and explained. The fortnightly quizzes are designed to practise the various skills required in philosophical writing. They will be scaffolded to help students in the preparation for tackling Assessment tasks. External/OUA students will engage in these activities online via dedicated iLearn discussion forums. For lecture times and classrooms please consult the MQ Timetable website: http://www.timetables.mq.edu.au. This website will display up-to-date information on your classes and classroom locations.

Lectures

Lectures will take place on Mondays 11am-12noon and Wednesdays 11am to 12noon. They will be recorded and made available via Echo360 Online Lecture Recordings shortly afterwards. 

Tutorials

Weekly tutorial classes (both in-class and online) will be conducted commencing from Week 2. Week 1 will be an Introductory session where students introduce themselves to each other and we discuss any issues relevant to studying this unit. Weekly Tutorial Discussion Questions will be posted before the Monday lectures. Students are required to respond to the Tutorial Discussion Questions and engage each other in discussion (via the dedicated online tutorial discussion forum) responding to issues raised in these responses. N.B.: Weekly tutorials will formally begin in WEEK 2 and will continue until WEEK 13 (Week 13 tutorial will be a discussion week focusing on the film Get Out).

Required and Recommended Texts and/or Materials

PHIX3052 Social and Existential Questions will be using electronically available readings available via Leganto on the iLearn website.

PART I - The Question of Existence [RS]

Week 1 Introduction: What is Existentialism?

Required Reading: Stephen Crowell, 'Existentialism', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online entry (2015): https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/  

 

Week 2 - Heidegger on Anxiety and Mortality

Required Reading:

Extracts from Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), §41 ‘The Being of Da-sein as Care’, pp. 179-183; §53 ‘Existential Project of an Authentic Being-toward-Death’, pp. 240-246.

Recommended:

Stephen Mulhall, The Routledge Guidebook to Heidegger’s Being and Time, (London and New York: Routledge, 2020), Chapter 5, ‘Theology Secularized: Mortality, Guilt, and Conscience, §§45-60’, pp. 12-134.

Oren Magid, 'The Ontological Import of Heidegger's Analysis of Anxiety in Being and Time', Southern Journal of Philosophy 54(4) (2016): 440-462. 

Background Reading:

Martin Wheeler, 'Martin Heidegger', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/

Dorothea Frede, ‘The Question of Being: Heidegger’s Project’, The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, edited Charles Guignon (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 2006), pp. 42-69.

 

Week 3 - Sartre on Consciousness and Freedom

Required Reading:

Extract from Sartre’s Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Philip Mairet (London: Methuen, 1948), pp. 26-34.

Extract from Sartre’s Being and Nothingness, ‘V. The Origin of Nothingness’, pp. 56-64; and ‘The For-Itself and the Being of Value’, pp. 133-139; pp. 623-629. 

Recommended:

Jack Reynolds, 'Condemned to Freedom: Sartre's Phenomenological Ontology, in J. Reynolds, Understanding Existentialism (Acumen, 2006), 51-88. 

Background reading: Thomas Flynn, 'Jean-Paul Sartre,' Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/

 

Part II: Ethics and Politics as Existential Tasks [RS]

Week 4 - The Problem of the Other

Required Reading:

Martin Heidegger, ‘The Mit-Dasein of Others and Everyday Being-with’, Being and Time, pp. 110-118; ‘Everyday Being-oneself and the They’, Being and Time, pp. 118-122.

Jean-Paul Sartre, ‘The Look’, Being and Nothingness, pp. 252-264.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty, ‘Others and the Human World’, Phenomenology of Perception, pp. 361-383.

Background reading:

Shaun Gallagher, ‘Intersubjectivity and Second-Person Perspective’, Phenomenology, pp. 182-204.

 

Week 5 - Feminist Existentialism

Required Reading:

Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity, 'Ambiguity and Freedom', pp. 5-30.

Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity, 'The Positive Aspect of Ambiguity', pp. 68-87.

Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 'Introduction', pp. 13-30.

Recommended:

Megan Burke, 'Simone de Beauvoir', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauvoir/

Tina Chanter, 'The Complexity of Women's Complicity' and 'Beyond Beauvoir', from Ethics of Eros: Irigaray's Rewriting of the Philosophers, pp. 68-79.

 

Week 6 - Black existentialism

Required Reading:

Frantz Fanon, 'The Fact of Blackness', from White Skin, Black Masks (1948), pp. 82-108 [121-147].

Lewis R. Gordon, 'Fanon as Critique of European Man' and 'Existential Phenomenology and History', from Fanon and the Crisis of European Man: An Essay on Philosophy and the Human Sciences, pp. 6-19.

Supplementary Texts:

John Drabinski, 'Frantz Fanon', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frantz-fanon/

Jean-Paul Sartre, 'Black Orpheus', pp. 13-52.

 

Part III - Philosophical Approaches to Race [AH]

Week 7 - Social Constructionism about Race, Deconstructed

Required Reading: 

Esa Diaz-Leon, ‘What is Social Construction?’, European Journal of Philosophy 23(4) (2015): 1137–52.

 

Week 8 - Is Race a Social Kind?

Required Reading:

Ronald Sundstrom, ‘Race as a Human Kind’. Philosophy & Social Criticism 28 (1) (2002): 91–115.

 

Week 9 - Is Race a Social Status? Or, is it Phenomenological?

Required Reading:

Extract from Ásta’s Categories We Live By: The Construction of Sex, Gender, Race, and Other Social Categories (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 93-108.

Sara Ahmed, ‘A Phenomenology of Whiteness’. Feminist Theory 8(2) (2007): 149–68.

 

Week 10 - Is Race Cultural? Or, is it Technological?

Chike Jeffers. 'Cultural Constructionism'. In What Is Race? Four Philosophical Views (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).

Introduction of Alana Lentin’s Why Race Still Matters (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2020).

Supplementary Text:

Chike Jeffers. ‘Jeffers’s Reply to Glasgow, Haslanger, and Spencer’. In What Is Race? Four Philosophical Views (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).

 

Week 11 - Replacing Race: Racialisation and Racialised Groups

Required Reading:

Lawrence Blum, ‘Racialized Groups: The Sociohistorical Consensus’. The Monist 93(2) (2010): 298–320.

 

Week 12 - Racial Identity and Transrace

Required Reading:

Ann Morning, ‘Race and Rachel Doležal’. Contexts 16(2) (2017): 8–11.

Recommended reading:

Tina Fernandes Botts, ‘In Black and White: A Hermeneutic Argument Against Transracialism.’ Res Philosophica 95(2) (2018): 303–29.

Rebecca Tuvel, ‘Racial Transitions and Controversial Positions: Reply to Taylor, Gordon, Sealey, Hom, and Botts’. Philosophy Today 62(1) (2018): 73–88.

 

Week 13 - Film: Get Out (Peele, 2017) [AH and RS]

Recommended Reading: Mary K. Bloodsworth Lugo, "Race, Bodies and Lived Realities in Get Out and Black Panther, in Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva, and Steven S. Gouveia (eds), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides (New York and Abingdon: Routledge, 2019), pp. 281-297.

• Revision of Content for Parts I & II
• New Content for Part III
• Addition of Film Discussion topic for Week 13 on Get Out