Students

EDIT8080 – Tools for Editing

2022 – Session 1, Online-flexible

General Information

Download as PDF
Unit convenor and teaching staff Unit convenor and teaching staff Convenor
Adam Smith
adam.smith@mq.edu.au
Philip Chappell
philip.chappell@mq.edu.au
Philip Chappell
philip.chappell@mq.edu.au
Credit points Credit points
10
Prerequisites Prerequisites
Admission to GradCertEditElecPub or MCrWrit or GradDipCrWrit or MAccComm
Corequisites Corequisites
Co-badged status Co-badged status
Unit description Unit description
This unit lays the groundwork for professional editing, focusing first on the roles and skills of the editor, as defined by the editorial standards set in Australia (the Australian Standards for Editorial Practice (ASEP 2012) and the Institute of Professional Editors' Accreditation Board exam); and those set overseas by professional organisations in Canada, the US and the UK. It examines the different requirements for copyediting on hardcopy and on screen, and the 'tools' and resources editors can draw on. Reference guides in style, usage and grammar are reviewed, as well as regional (British v. American) preferences, and issues of editorial policy in relation to inclusive language. Selections in typography and layout for optimal legibility are also discussed.

Important Academic Dates

Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates

Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  • ULO1: Analyse standard guidelines set out for editorial work, and identify scope for individual decision making.
  • ULO2: Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • ULO3: Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.
  • ULO4: Appraise the effectiveness of different font and layout choices, and assess their impact on legibility.

General Assessment Information

How to apply for a late submission of an assignment

All requests for special consideration, including extensions, must be submitted via ask.mq.edu.au and provide suitable supporting documentation

Requesting an extension to assignment due date

On occasion, you may be in a situation when you aren't able to submit an assessment task on time. Extensions are only given in special circumstances, by completing a Special Consideration request. For more information on Special Consideration, see https://students.mq.edu.au/study/my-study-program/special-consideration

Late submission of assignments If you haven't been approved for an extension and you submit your assessment task late, penalties are applied. You should consult your unit convenor if you are in this position. Late submissions will receive a 5% per day penalty. If you submit the assessment task 10 days or more beyond the due date, without an approved extension, you will be awarded a maximum of 50% of the overall assessment marks. Weekends and public holidays are included.

Assessment Tasks

Name Weighting Hurdle Due
Weekly quiz 10% No Weekly
Online discussion on editing standards 15% No Week 4
International editing task 20% No Week 7
Online discussion on usage issues 15% No Week 10
Practical assignment on legibility 40% No Week 13

Weekly quiz

Assessment Type 1: Quiz/Test
Indicative Time on Task 2: 5 hours
Due: Weekly
Weighting: 10%

 

A total of 10 short quizzes will be completed by students, each based on weekly lecture topics and the guided tasks associated with them.

 
On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Analyse standard guidelines set out for editorial work, and identify scope for individual decision making.
  • Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.
  • Appraise the effectiveness of different font and layout choices, and assess their impact on legibility.

Online discussion on editing standards

Assessment Type 1: Debate
Indicative Time on Task 2: 7.5 hours
Due: Week 4
Weighting: 15%

 

Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of editing standards in an online forum. Each student has to present 2 aspects of editorial roles that could be better covered by the official standards, defend their position, and critique the positions of other students on 2 other aspects of editorial work.

 
On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Analyse standard guidelines set out for editorial work, and identify scope for individual decision making.
  • Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.

International editing task

Assessment Type 1: Practice-based task
Indicative Time on Task 2: 10 hours
Due: Week 7
Weighting: 20%

 

Identification of different regional features that require editing in texts.

 
On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Analyse standard guidelines set out for editorial work, and identify scope for individual decision making.
  • Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.

Online discussion on usage issues

Assessment Type 1: Debate
Indicative Time on Task 2: 7.5 hours
Due: Week 10
Weighting: 15%

 

Identification and discussion of common usage issues in an online forum. Each student has to present 2 language usage issues and argue for or against their validity based on authoritative references. They also have to critique the position of other students on 2 other usage issues.

 
On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Analyse standard guidelines set out for editorial work, and identify scope for individual decision making.
  • Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.

Practical assignment on legibility

Assessment Type 1: Qualitative analysis task
Indicative Time on Task 2: 20 hours
Due: Week 13
Weighting: 40%

 

Identify and solve legibility issues in a text that students choose themselves.

 
On successful completion you will be able to:
  • Apply skills in the use of standard tools and techniques for editing, both in print and in electronic media.
  • Examine texts for variable language use, and justify their suitability for different audiences.
  • Appraise the effectiveness of different font and layout choices, and assess their impact on legibility.

1 If you need help with your assignment, please contact:

  • the academic teaching staff in your unit for guidance in understanding or completing this type of assessment
  • the Writing Centre for academic skills support.

2 Indicative time-on-task is an estimate of the time required for completion of the assessment task and is subject to individual variation

Delivery and Resources

This unit is delivered entirely online. Online lectures are available as audio recordings with supporting slides. Weekly tasks will also be given online, and readings are made available via the Leganto reading list.

Policies and Procedures

Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:

Students seeking more policy resources can visit Student Policies (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/policies). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.

To find other policies relating to Teaching and Learning, visit Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au) and use the search tool.

Student Code of Conduct

Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/admin/other-resources/student-conduct

Results

Results published on platform other than eStudent, (eg. iLearn, Coursera etc.) or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au or if you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au

Academic Integrity

At Macquarie, we believe academic integrity – honesty, respect, trust, responsibility, fairness and courage – is at the core of learning, teaching and research. We recognise that meeting the expectations required to complete your assessments can be challenging. So, we offer you a range of resources and services to help you reach your potential, including free online writing and maths support, academic skills development and wellbeing consultations.

Student Support

Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/

The Writing Centre

The Writing Centre provides resources to develop your English language proficiency, academic writing, and communication skills.

The Library provides online and face to face support to help you find and use relevant information resources. 

Student Services and Support

Macquarie University offers a range of Student Support Services including:

Student Enquiries

Got a question? Ask us via AskMQ, or contact Service Connect.

IT Help

For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/. 

When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.

Unit information based on version 2022.03 of the Handbook