Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Convenor, Lecturer
Dr. Peter Busch
Contact via Email
4 RPD 284
TBD
Lecturer, practical demonstrator
Mr. Yang Zhang
Contact via Email
4 RPD 3rd floor
TBD
Practical demonstrator
Mr. Arthur Tsang
Contact via Email
TBD
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
10
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
130cp at 1000 level or above including (COMP2350 or ISYS224) or (COMP2750 or ISYS254) or (COMP2050 or COMP255)
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
COMP6760
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit aims to provide an understanding of how information systems can be integrated into the overall business layer of an organisation. The unit focuses on methods and techniques to enhance the alignment of information systems with business strategy, objectives and processes. Issues covered include: process modelling, corporate modelling, workflow modelling, business process re-engineering, enterprise resource planning, business-to-business integration and supply chain management. Various technical approaches to tackling integration problems are discussed.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Late Assessment Submission Penalty
From 1 July 2022, Students enrolled in Session based units with written assessments will have the following university standard late penalty applied. Please see https://students.mq.edu.au/study/assessment-exams/assessments for more information.
The Special Consideration Policy aims to support students who have been impacted by short-term circumstances or events that are serious, unavoidable and significantly disruptive, and which may affect their performance in assessment. If you experience circumstances or events that affect your ability to complete the assessments in this unit on time, please inform the convenor and submit a Special Consideration request through ask.mq.edu.au.
Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, a 5% penalty (of the total possible mark) will be applied each day a written assessment is not submitted, up until the 7th day (including weekends). After the 7th day, a grade of '0' will be awarded even if the assessment is submitted. Submission time for all written assessments is set at 11:55 pm. A 1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical concern.
For any late submission of time-sensitive tasks, such as scheduled tests/exams, performance assessments/presentations, and/or scheduled practical assessments/labs, students need to submit an application for Special Consideration.
Assessments where Late Submissions will be accepted
In this unit, late submissions will accepted as follows:
• Assignment 1 - YES, Standard Late Penalty applies
• Assignment 2 - YES, Standard Late Penalty applies
• Assignment 3 - YES, Standard Late Penalty applies
Assessment tools and submission
Marking rubrics are used for assignments
Assignments are submitted on iLearn and Turnitin
Assessments are marked as soon as practicable - typically within a couple of weeks.
The exam may take place via a pink paper or online. Where a special consideration for an exam has been submitted and accepted a supplementary exam is available some weeks after the initial exam.
To pass this unit you must:
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Assignment 1 | 10% | No | 18th August |
Assignment 3 | 20% | No | 20th October |
Exam | 50% | No | 6-24th November |
Assignment 2 | 20% | No | 15th September |
Assessment Type 1: Report
Indicative Time on Task 2: 10 hours
Due: 18th August
Weighting: 10%
A report on eBusiness principles
Assessment Type 1: Practice-based task
Indicative Time on Task 2: 20 hours
Due: 20th October
Weighting: 20%
Group assignment implementing an eBusiness solution. These will be peer moderated and marks assigned individually within the group. Groups will be self-selecting. If individuals have not allocated themselves to a group within a set time, people will be allocated to a group by the lecturer.
Assessment Type 1: Examination
Indicative Time on Task 2: 40 hours
Due: 6-24th November
Weighting: 50%
Examination on potentially all material covered in the unit.
Assessment Type 1: Design Task
Indicative Time on Task 2: 20 hours
Due: 15th September
Weighting: 20%
Business Process Modelling
1 If you need help with your assignment, please contact:
2 Indicative time-on-task is an estimate of the time required for completion of the assessment task and is subject to individual variation
Each week you should attend three hours of lectures. The two hours on the Tuesday will be standard lecture format. The third hour of lecture on the Wednesday will act as a SGTA (Small Group Learning Activity). There will also be a practical class covering the technology - modelling tools, XML etc..
For details of days, times and rooms consult the timetables webpage.
Lectures commence in week 1.
Note that the practical classes commence in week 2.
You should have selected a practical class enrollment. It will not particularly matter if you do not attend the practical you are enrolled in as practical attendance is not compulsory, but should be useful to you.
Textbook
A recommended eText for COMP3760/6760 (around which some of the course is based) is:
Papazoglou, M., Ribbers, P., (2010) e-Business: Organizational and Technical Foundations John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester West Sussex U.K.
There are a few more books you may wish to acquire, these are not compulsory but potentially helpful.
echo360
Digital recordings of lectures are available. We will record with echo360. Read instructions here.
Technology
Technology used will include IBM BP Modeller, Adonis etc. Students are also expected to make use of MS Word, MS Excel and MS Powerpoint and editing software to undertake XML and BPEL.
Discussion Boards
When groups are chosen for the group assignment, you will have the opportunity to discuss issues amongst yourselves on iLearn.
Methods of Communication
We will communicate with you via your university email and through announcements on iLearn. Queries to convenors can either be placed on the iLearn discussion board or sent to the unit convenor via the contact email on iLearn.
COVID Information
For the latest information on the University’s response to COVID-19, please refer to the Coronavirus infection page on the Macquarie website: https://www.mq.edu.au/about/coronavirus-faqs. Remember to check this page regularly in case the information and requirements change during semester. If there are any changes to this unit in relation to COVID, these will be communicated via iLearn.
Week |
Lecture - Monday 3-5pm |
Text |
Practicals Zhang, Tsang |
1 Busch |
Introduction to eBusiness and planning for eBusiness |
Papazoglou and Ribbers chapters 1, 2 |
No practical |
2 Busch |
Information modelling for eBusiness and BPM |
chapter 12 |
Introduction to modelling |
3 Busch |
eBusiness models and relationships |
chapters 3, 4 |
Introduction to ADONIS 1 |
4 Busch |
Governance structures and eMarkets |
chapters 5, 8 |
Assignment 1 (10%) due 18th August ADONIS practical 2 |
5 Busch |
Knowledge management |
Busch (2008) |
ADONIS practical 3 |
6 Busch |
eBusiness technological infrastructure |
chapter 6 |
ADONIS practical 4 |
7 Zhang |
XML EDI and Middleware EDI concepts and standards Middleware concepts, architecture and systems |
chapters 7, 14 |
Introduction to XML |
Mid Semester Break: 9-24th September Assignment 2 (20%) due 15th September |
|||
8 Zhang |
Loosely coupled eBusiness solutions Concept of software as a service Web services Web service architecture |
chapter 19 |
XML, Middleware |
9 Zhang |
Workflow systems Workflow concepts Workflow elements Workflow modeling Workflow verification |
chapter 18 |
Business solutions, Workflow systems |
10 Zhang |
Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) Concepts Technologies |
chapter 17 |
Assignment work |
11 Zhang |
Leveraging legacy applications |
chapter 16 |
Group assignment (20%) due 20th October |
12 Zhang |
Business protocols Why are business protocols and standards needed XML technology stack for eBusiness integration RosettaNet Electonic business XML |
chapter 20 |
XML |
13 Busch, Zhang |
Revision for the exam |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Students seeking more policy resources can visit Student Policies (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/policies). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
To find other policies relating to Teaching and Learning, visit Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au) and use the search tool.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/admin/other-resources/student-conduct
Results published on platform other than eStudent, (eg. iLearn, Coursera etc.) or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au or if you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
At Macquarie, we believe academic integrity – honesty, respect, trust, responsibility, fairness and courage – is at the core of learning, teaching and research. We recognise that meeting the expectations required to complete your assessments can be challenging. So, we offer you a range of resources and services to help you reach your potential, including free online writing and maths support, academic skills development and wellbeing consultations.
Late Assignment Submission policy: Late work will be accepted with a penalty of 10% of the marks for the assignment per day submitted late. Hence, an assignment submitted five days late will get at most half the marks. If you cannot submit on time because of illness or other circumstances, please contact the lecturer before the due date.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
The Writing Centre provides resources to develop your English language proficiency, academic writing, and communication skills.
The Library provides online and face to face support to help you find and use relevant information resources.
Macquarie University offers a range of Student Support Services including:
Got a question? Ask us via AskMQ, or contact Service Connect.
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
This year Mr. Yang Zhang joins us as a lecturer replacing Prof. Jian Yang, while Yang also remains a practical demonstrator. Lecture notes are also updated as is the SGTA material.
Mr. Arthur Tsang joins us as an practical instructor.
We value student feedback to be able to continually improve the way we offer our units. As such we encourage students to provide constructive feedback via student surveys, to the teaching staff directly, or via the FSE Student Experience & Feedback link in the iLearn page.
Standards
Four standards, namely HD, D, CR, P summarize as many different levels of achievement. Each standard is precisely defined to help students know what kind of performance is expected to deserve a certain mark. The standards corresponding to the learning outcomes of this unit are given below:
Criteria for L.O. #1 | Developing | Functional | Proficient | Advanced | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
comprehending strategic strengths of companies
|
an understanding that organisations have strengths, expressed through basic statements articulating how some organisations may be better than others |
some indication that literature exists providing wider examples of competitive strengths in organisations
|
satisfactory recourse to the literature, illustrating similar company profiles with regard to their competitive advantage and how these factors relate to the material under study |
a comprehensive study of the literature providing wider examples of similar companies and how their strengths have made them stronger over their competitors |
|
understanding the impact of internet
|
limited understanding with regard to what the internet can deliver to business improvement
|
some awareness of how ecommerce changed the modern business by showing minimal examples from the literature
|
providing numerous examples from the literature showing how the internet has changed the modern business world
|
a excellent analysis of the literature, including the weekly readings, illustrating the impact of the internet on modern business |
|
Criteria for L.O. #2 | |||||
undertaking SWOT analysis |
a limited understanding of what SWOT is and how it works, perhaps making a few simple mistakes |
competent analysis of SWOT for a given organisation listing a few each of S, W, O and T factors | good SWOT analysis, with some recourse to the literature providing similar examples in the case of other organisations | outstanding SWOT analysis with comprehensive recourse to the literature | |
Criteria for L.O. #3 | |||||
using modelling software | limited use of BP Modeller showing some understanding of the tool | competent use of BP Modeller showing understanding of the software and ability to use it effectively, perhaps making some basic mistakes | good understanding of the software, modelling workflows proficiently and using tool appropriately without any significant mistakes |
|
|
workflow modelling to improve workflow effeciency | limited understanding of workflow modelling, some obvious mistakes | competent understanding of workflow modelling, some trivial mistakes still in evidence, but generally an understanding of what is taking place and why | some incorporation of the literature beyond just compentent understanding of workflow modelling | an excellent grasp of workflow modelling, also drawing on the literature widely to exemplify in the case of further examples how workflow modelling has aided other organisations as well | |
Criteria for L.O. #4 | |||||
understanding how use of code such as XML will enable ecommerce | limited understanding of what XML actually is and does, however showing some understanding of how XML enables ecommerce | competent understanding of XML, limited recourse to the literature, perhaps just relying on the textbook or lecture notes | good understanding of the role of XML, with some recourse to examples in the literature, beyond just knowledge of XML from the lecture notes | outstanding understanding of the role XML plays, with comprehensive recourse to the literature providing further examples beyond what was asked for in the assignment | |
competence in XML | basic competence in coding, shows obvious and basic mistakes in coding | proficient but perhaps ineffecient coding in XML, still displaying some mistakes, parameters names obtuse and commenting limited | proficient coding in XML, perhaps a few trivial mistakes still in evidence, but generally codes quite competently | outstanding coding in XML, with code effeciencies clearly displayed, all parameters using meaningful names, code well commented | |
Criteria for L.O. #5 | |||||
understanding how WSDL and BPEL enable ecommerce | limited understanding of what WSDL and BPEL actually is and do, however showing some understanding of how they enables ecommerce | competent understanding of WSDL and BPEL, limited recourse to the literature, perhaps just relying on the textbook or lecture notes | good understanding of the role of WSDL and BPEL, with some recourse to examples in the literature, beyond just knowledge of WSDL and BPEL from the lecture notes | outstanding understanding of the role WSDL and BPEL play, with comprehensive recourse to the literature providing further examples beyond what was asked for in the assignment | |
competence in WSDL and BPEL | basic competence in coding, shows obvious and basic mistakes in coding | proficient but perhaps ineffecient coding in WSDL and BPEL, still displaying some mistakes, parameters names obtuse and commenting limited | proficient coding in WSDL and BPEL, perhaps a few trivial mistakes still in evidence, but generally codes quite competently | outstanding coding in WSDL and BPEL, with code effeciencies clearly displayed, all parameters using meaningful names, code well commented |
For each task, those standards translate into a mark and the different component marks are added up. You will then be given a grade that reflects your achievement in the unit. The following description of the different grades is still in draft form and therefore not official as yet
The final mark for the unit will be calculated by combining the marks for all assessment tasks according to the percentage weightings shown in the assessment summary.
Date | Description |
---|---|
04/10/2023 | "Tutorial" replaced by SGTA (Small Group Teaching Activity) |
Unit information based on version 2023.02 of the Handbook