All written assessments submitted electronically must be submitted through the link provided in iLearn. This unit will utilise Turnitin plagiarism detection software. Students should carefully check that they submit the correct file for an assessment, as re-submissions will not be accepted after the due date and time, including instances where students upload an incorrect file in error. The design, moderation and feedback of all assessments is in accordance with the Macquarie University Assessment Procedure (link provided under ‘Policies and Procedures’ below). Late Submission Policy A maximum penalty of five (5) percentage points of the total possible marks will be applied per day to late submissions, for up to a maximum of seven calendar days. Tasks that have not been submitted within the maximum number of additional late days will receive a mark of zero. This provision does not apply to online exams or other assessment with a time limit of less than 24 hours. Penalties for late submission will be applied consistently and equitably to all students enrolled in the unit. Where short-term, serious and unavoidable circumstances have affected their ability to submit an assessment task, a student must submit a formal application for Special Consideration as per the Special Consideration Policy. Students should not request an informal arrangement from their tutor, lecturer or Unit Convenor. Where an application for Special Consideration is approved, and the outcome is an extension to the due date of a task, submissions that are received after the new due date will be subject to late penalties that are calculated from the new due date. This only applies where the outcome is an extension to the due date – see the Special Consideration Policy for a schedule of all possible outcomes. Special Consideration Students should submit applications for Special Consideration electronically via the Service Connect portal, along with the supporting documentation. Before submitting their applications, students should refer to the Special Consideration Policy (link provided under ‘Policies and Procedures’ below).

 

Delivery Lectures: 13 lectures, recorded on ECHO Tutorials: 12 tutorials - offered in both face to face and online sections. As part of the art of lawyering, international private law issues are best addressed through problem solving.   Tutorial work is an opportunity to see how the doctrines actually work to solve problems.  It is a time for students to support each other as we work through challenging real-life situations based on recent Australian, UK, Canadian, EU and US case decisions. Engagement, as directed,  in tutorials is essential for the Professionbal Skills assessment

This unit is worth 10 credit points, which equates to 150 hours of work. Therefore, students should expect to commit an average of 10 hours per week to this unit, including all scheduled and unscheduled activities and preparing and executing the assessment tasks.

Resources The required textbook is Nygh's Conflict of Laws 10th Ed (2020).  If students feel that they would also benefit from a textbook, Private International Law in Australia by Reid Mortensen et al 5th Edition (2023) may be helpful but will not otherwise be referred to in the course and is not required. Students can purchase these textbooks online from online resellers such as Booktopia, The Nile, Amazon and Zookal. Additional readings will be accessible through iLearn.

Students require access to a computer, internet with decent speed, camera and a secure/reliable server. The iLearn page contains all Unit requirements and a weekly schedule for teaching, readings and tutorials. Information about all assessment tasks is also available on iLearn. Note for the Viva Voce assessment, unless conducted face to face, a working cameria is mandatory

The following is a general and somewhat idealised version of what we will cover. The current version will be available on iLearn and will be subject to modification.

The study of  Private International Law, more traditionally known as conflict of laws, has never been more essential than it is now. As Australian lawmakers struggle to deal with international internet-related problems, the key issues of  jurisdiction, forum non conveniens, anti-suit injunctions, choice of law, and enforcement of judgments in foreign tribunals have become essential tools of the lawyer and lawmaker.  These subjects constitute PIL. Further, our subject also deals with jurisdictional issues in nations that have both indigenous legal systems as well as state/federal legal systems.

In recent years, the subject known as conflict of laws has become more commonly called private international law.  However, in Australia, Canada and the United States, conflict of laws is arguably a more apt title because the conflict situations are typically domestic as opposed to international. This, however, is changing, as Australia attempts to enforce its domestic laws against multi-national corporations. Going with the times, we have changed our name to Private International Law - As you will see, this is not international law but international application of domestic procedural laws.

Essentially, conflicts, as our subject is commonly known, deals with many aspects of procedural law - some of which may be outcome determinative.  The most well-known aspect of this is the subject of choice of law.  This is the doctrine that enables a lawyer to advise the court as to the state or national body of law that is to be applied to a dispute. The subject also deals with jurisdiction, injunctions in aid of jurisdiction, restraints on local proceedings and enforcement of judgments. Conflicts may be unique among law courses because it is perhaps the only subject in which non-lawyers rarely have any knowledge or even awareness of the concept’s existence. It is not unfair to say the conflict of laws is a subject known only to the legal profession and is essential to the lawyer's art. While frequently addressed in terms of disputes (litigation), international private law is also an essential body of law for legal practitioners who draft agreements because many issues are subject to party agreement.

Private International Law is not just a matter of following rules. Rather, knowledge of the principles guides skilled practitioners in obtaining better outcomes for their clients. While based on legal theory, in practice, PIL permits lawyers to attempt to utilise the most desirable venues and bodies of law to benefit their clients’ interests. 

Using a problem-based approach, this course will examine a variety of circumstances to see how choice of law theory can be strategically applied to influence the ultimate outcome of a dispute. Perhaps the centrality of a working knowledge of international private law is exemplified by the following examples:

A client believes that she has been defamed by a posting on a social media website. The individual who made the posting is unknown (but known to the website operator). The corporation that owns the social media website is located in the United States and does not have any offices in Australia but does have a local subsidiary.

The client wants you to file suit against the American social media company in NSW. Does the court have (1) in personam jurisdiction (jurisdiction over the person of the defendant), (2) which state's (nation's) laws of defamation would apply, and (3) how could any judgment in your client's favour be enforced?

Or, in a more mundane situation -

An independent contractor called Alan resides in Victoria. He is assigned projects by Apex Corporation.  Apex trained him in Victoria and required him to purchase various specified equipment including a stepladder manufactured by Bosco Specialties in Brisbane, Queensland.  Most of the work performed by Alan for Apex is in Victoria.  While working on a project for Apex just across the border in New South Wales, Alan fell from the stepladder and sustained extremely serious injuries.  Alan believes that he fell because the ladder was defectively designed and manufactured.  Alan's claim against Apex has been resolved through Workers' Compensation and is not in issue.

Alan presents himself to you at your law office in Victoria.  A decision is made to proceed by way of litigation in the Supreme Court of Victoria against Bosco Specialties.  The plaintiff was tardy coming to you for advice but you ascertain that the statute of limitations for pursuing an action in tort is not time barred under Victorian law.  But, you also note that under both NSW and Queensland laws, the action appears to be time-barred.  If the action is commenced in Victoria, will it likely be time-barred?

While the common law of tort is uniform across Australia; statutes of limitation vary among the States.  Here, the correct statute of limitation may be outcome determinative.  While this seems like a rather mundane personal injury matter, it presents classic conflict of laws issues that will likely decide whether the matter may proceed or will be time-barred.

In both of these situations, private international law or conflict of laws provides the tools necessary to reach the correct results

Tentative Weekly Schedule - Readings will also include materials listed on iLearn and available through Leganto. recent court decisions will be made available through iLearn. The schedule is subject to change in the event of new developments.

This year, the research essay assessment has been deleted