Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Convenor and Lecturer
John Ehrich
Contact via email
25 WW Level 6 room 56
9 am - 4 pm Monday - Friday
Tutor
Hye Eun Chu
Contact via email
25 WW Level 6
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
10
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
Admission to MTeach(Prim) or MTeach(Sec) or MEd or GradCertEd or MEdLead or MHEd or GradCertHEd or MEChild or GradCertEChild or MTeach(0-5) or GradCertClinEdSim or MIndigenousEd or GradDipIndigenousEd or GradDipChildLit or MChildLit
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit is designed as an introduction to the technical dimensions of educational assessment, measurement, and evaluation. The aim of this unit is to equip teachers and higher education academics with assessment, measurement, and evaluative skills in order to meet the ever increasing demands on teachers and lecturers to use assessment data to enhance learning. Educators today are expected to collect, compile, and analyse assessment data in order to inform teaching, to facilitate the planning of syllabuses, and to evaluate programs of work. In order to meet these needs, this unit introduces the fundamental principles of assessment, the basic mathematics of educational measurement, and models of learning program evaluation.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Please format assessments using 12-point font and 1.5 spacing.
All assessments must be submitted electronically. Turnitin plagiarism detection software is used to check all written assessments. It is the responsibility of all students to ensure that their submitted work is in a format compatible with Turnitin software for plagiarism checking. Submissions must meet the required file type and formatting specifications outlined in the assessment guidelines. Failure to submit work in an acceptable format may result in delays in processing your submission and potential penalties for non-compliance with assessment requirements. If you are unsure about the file format or have technical difficulties, it is your responsibility to seek assistance before the submission deadline. Students should be careful to check that they submit the correct file for an assessment as no re-submissions will be accepted after the due date and time, including instances where students upload an incorrect file. It is not the responsibility of unit staff to contact students who have failed to submit assessments. If you have any missing items of assessment, it is your responsibility to contact the unit convenor.
Students can use Turnitin’s Originality Report as a learning tool to improve their academic writing if this option is made available in the unit. Word limits are strictly applied. Work above the word limit will not be marked.
Students should be aware of and apply the University policy on academic integrity (see: https://p olicies.mq.edu.au/document/view.php?id=3). Any student suspected of using unauthorised AI in an assignment will be referred to the Faculty of Arts Discipline Committee. Penalties can include reduced marks for an assessment, being awarded '0' for a task, failing an entire unit, being excluded from a course of study. Please see each assessment task description/rubric for expectations about AI.
Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, a 5% penalty (of the total possible mark) will be applied each day an assessment is not submitted, up until the 7th day (including weekends) (see: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/assessment-exams/special-conside ration). Applications for extensions must be made via Service Connect. After the 7th day, a mark of 0 (zero) will be awarded even if the assessment is submitted. Submission time for all written assessments is set at 11:55pm. A 1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical issue. This late penalty will apply to non-timed sensitive assessments (incl. essays, reports, posters, portfolios, journals, recordings etc).
Late submission of time sensitive tasks (such as tests/exams, performance assessments/ presentations, scheduled practical assessments/labs etc) will only be addressed by the unit convenor in a Special Consideration application. A Special Consideration outcome may result in a new question or topic.
All assessments are marked using a rubric. Marking of all assessments is moderated by the Unit Convenor.
Assignments will be awarded grades ranging from HD to F according to guidelines set out in the University's Grading System and University Assessment Policy.
To meet the unit outcomes and successfully pass this unit, students should attempt all assessment tasks.
Grade |
Descriptor |
HD (High Distinction) |
Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem-solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline. Does not report content or ideas generated by third parties or AI sources. |
D (Distinction) |
Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. Does not report content or ideas generated by third parties or AI sources. |
Cr (Credit) |
Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Does not report content or ideas generated by third parties or AI sources. |
P (Pass) |
Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes. Does not report content or ideas generated by third parties or AI sources.
|
F (Fail) |
Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline. Reports content or ideas generated by third parties or AI sources. |
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
A written report in three parts using educational data (2500 words). | 50% | No | 23:55 15/10/2025 |
Final Examination | 50% | No | During examination period |
Assessment Type 1: Case study/analysis
Indicative Time on Task 2: 40 hours
Due: 23:55 15/10/2025
Weighting: 50%
In this assignment students are required to write a report on a fictional school or Higher Education department using NAPLAN or Higher Education data. In part 1 (500 words) students will interpret, analyse and compare a data set with normative educational data. In Part 2 (1000 words), students will determine a specific issue which is identifiable in the data (e.g., poor attendance of students, boys not making benchmarks in reading etc.). Students will then review current empirical research on the factors relating to the chosen issue. In Part 3 (1000 words), students will outline a proposal (a list of recommendations) which are aimed at resolving the chosen issue and improving the outcomes of students. This will include an evaluation plan using the Logic Plan to assess the effectiveness of the plan to improve learning outcomes.
Assessment Type 1: Examination
Indicative Time on Task 2: 40 hours
Due: During examination period
Weighting: 50%
Examination (2 hours) (MC, short answer, and open-ended response)
1 If you need help with your assignment, please contact:
2 Indicative time-on-task is an estimate of the time required for completion of the assessment task and is subject to individual variation
There is no required textbook for this subject. All readings are provided via the LEGANTO system in iLearn.
This unit has a full web presence through iLearn. Information for students about access to the online component of this unit is available at https://ilearn.mq.edu.au/login/index.php. You will need to enter your student username and password.
Please do NOT contact the Unit Convenor regarding iLearn technical help. Assistance is available from IT Helpdesk: via email onehelp@mq.edu.au or Ph: 9850 4357 or 1800 67 4357. On Campus: Ground floor at 18 Wally’s Walk.
Students will need regular access to a computer and the Internet to complete this unit. Weekly access to iLearn is compulsory for all students. Important assessment information will be posted here, as will other relevant unit notices and materials, including a reading template and guide to lecture note taking to assist your studies. Various activities and materials for discussion and critical reflection are included and students enrolled in online mode are especially encouraged to use this web component. Electronic links and suggested references will be included in the Resources section. Please check the iLearn unit regularly. Weekly lectures are available on the web through the ECHO360 lecture component. You must listen to all lectures. PowerPoint slides are available in iLearn in advance of the weekly lecture and/or are available in the Active Learning Tool.
The unit structure can be found in the university timetable. In the tutorial students will discuss issues and questions arising from the lectures and prescribed readings. Students are expected to base their arguments/discussions on evidence from published research and other relevant material. There will be a supporting iLearn site for the unit providing additional readings, links and materials. The weekly program for the course with the accompanying readings/preparation is available on the following pages and on the unit iLearn site. Students are required to listen to the respective weekly pre-recorded lectures, do the set readings, and participate in one tutorial every teaching week (and contribute to the online discussions where specified).
Unit Schedule
Wk |
Week Start |
Lecture |
Tutorial Topic |
Reading |
1 |
28th July |
Introduction Principles of assessment |
Principles of assessment/current research and trends |
Unit guide Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4 – 14. Elwood, J. & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243-256. |
2 |
4th August |
Mathematics of measurement 1 |
The basic mathematics of measurement theory and how it can be applied to educational data part 1. |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapter 2. Wright, B. D. (1997). A history of social science measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practices, 33 – 45. |
3 |
11th August
|
Mathematics of measurement 2 |
The basic mathematics of measurement theory and how it can be applied to educational data part 2. |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapter 6. |
4 |
18th August
|
Reliability |
Reliability of assessments for teachers |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapter 4. Brookhart, S. M. (2005). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5 – 12. 3. |
5 |
25th August
|
Validity |
Validity of assessments for teachers |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapters 5. Moss, P. A. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13–25. |
6 |
1st September |
Standardised Testing |
Standardised tests & testing/ NAPLAN |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapter 3. Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012) The impact of high stakes testing: the Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65-79. |
7 |
8th September |
Quantitative & Qualitative Data |
Interpreting and using quantitative and qualitative data |
Shaddock, A. (2014). Using data to improve learning. ACER Press: Victoria. Chapter 3 & 8. Matters, G. (2006). Using Data to Support Learning in Schools Students, teachers, systems. Australian Council for Educational Research. p. 1 – 14. |
8 |
15th September |
Evaluation and marking |
Evaluation of educational programs/ Marks and grading |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapter 11. Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012) Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67, Medical Teacher, 34(5), e288-e299, DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
|
|
22nd September |
|
|
Recess |
|
29th September |
|
|
Recess |
9 |
6th October |
Test construction |
Creating a classroom test |
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. Pearson: US. Chapters 7. |
10 |
13th October
15th October Major assignment due |
|
|
Professional experience |
11 |
20th October |
|
|
Professional experience |
12 |
27th October |
|
|
Professional experience |
13 |
3rd November |
Review |
|
|
|
10th - 28th November |
EXAM PERIOD |
|
|
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Students seeking more policy resources can visit Student Policies (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/policies). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
To find other policies relating to Teaching and Learning, visit Policy Central (https://policies.mq.edu.au) and use the search tool.
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/admin/other-resources/student-conduct
Results published on platform other than eStudent, (eg. iLearn, Coursera etc.) or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit connect.mq.edu.au or if you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
At Macquarie, we believe academic integrity – honesty, respect, trust, responsibility, fairness and courage – is at the core of learning, teaching and research. We recognise that meeting the expectations required to complete your assessments can be challenging. So, we offer you a range of resources and services to help you reach your potential, including free online writing and maths support, academic skills development and wellbeing consultations.
This unit is a part of a professional course listed on Schedules 2 and 3 of the Academic Progress on Policy. This course has additional requirements that are applicable for the full duration of the course, including course-specific Inherent Requirements, Fitness to Practice requirements and other compulsory course requirements. It also has rigorous academic progression standards. Inability to meet these requirements may result in a withdrawal of offer of admission and/or permanent exclusion from the course in accordance with the General Coursework Rules.
Macquarie University operates under a ‘Fitness to Practice’ model as specified in the University's Academic Progression Policy. For this unit, this means that, when undertaking a placement, a student is declaring that they are able to demonstrate professional competence, acceptable professional behaviour, freedom from impairment, and compliance with program specific requirements needed for a student to practice properly and safely throughout their Practical, Clinical or Professional program or unit. It is the responsibility of the student to determine whether they are fit to undertake a placement. Therefore, if a student is feeling unfit to undertake a placement, they should not do so.
For more information see the Academic Progression Policy.
It is the student’s responsibility to check all electronic communication on a weekly basis. Communication may occur via:
See the University timetable for information about when classes begin in this unit. Creating your timetable - Enrolling | Macquarie University, Sydney (mq.edu.au)
Attendance at all synchronous activities, completion of non-synchronous formative/diagnostic class tasks and involvement in professional forums is important as the Master of Teaching is a professional qualification. Activities completed during weekly tutorials (DAY or ONLINE DAY mode) are essential for building the core knowledge and/or skills required to demonstrate the learning outcomes of this unit and to meet the AITSL Graduate Teacher Standards and/or ACECQA requirements. Attendance at tutorials and/or on campus days is expected and will be recorded.
Students are required to attend the tutorial in which they are enrolled. Any changes to tutorial enrolments must be completed officially through e-Student. Please do not contact the unit convenor to request a change.
If you are considering withdrawing from this unit, please seek academic advice via Service Conn ect before doing so as this unit may be a co-requisite or prerequisite for units in the following sessions and may impact your course progression.
To enrol in EDST8302 PEx Unit you must have met the standard for both the Literacy and Numeracy tests prior to commencing the professional experience placement unit. Enrolling in EDST8302 while waiting for your results will not be accepted. You will be required to unenrol.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Academic Success provides resources to develop your English language proficiency, academic writing, and communication skills.
The Library provides online and face to face support to help you find and use relevant information resources.
Macquarie University offers a range of Student Support Services including:
Got a question? Ask us via the Service Connect Portal, or contact Service Connect.
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Unit information based on version 2025.02 of the Handbook