Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Other Staff
Chris Houston
Contact via chris.houston@mq.edu.au
Unit Convenor
Guy Threlfo
Contact via guy.threlfo@mq.edu.au
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
ANTH150 or 12cp or admission to GDipArts
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
We are surrounded by economic activity and yet often oblivious to it, like fish in water. Is greed universal? Is a free market inevitable? If Western societies are so wealthy, why do we feel unable to meet our needs and expectations? This unit explores wealth and poverty across cultures, examining the diverse ways people organise their economic life, decide who gets what, and determine what is valuable. From classical studies in anthropology to contemporary events like consumer fads, stock fraud, real estate bubbles, and corporate bailouts, we explore how economic phenomena cut across cultures, uniting what may appear to be different sorts of societies. This unit explores cultural diversity in a range of areas: shopping, gift giving, money, status seeking, trade, advertising, exploitation, and even get-rich-quick schemes. Across many cultures, we study the effects of the corporation, commoditisation, global trade, colonialism, materialism, and a range of other contemporary economic forces affecting the way that people consume. From cargo cults to The Secret, Native American potlatches to bank-busting weddings, Fair Trade to foraging, we find that humans, including ourselves, may be stranger than we think but not all that different from each other, and even that we are connected with those that appear to live a world away.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Name | Weighting | Due |
---|---|---|
Tute Participation | 10% | N/A |
Tutorial Reports | 10% | each and every week |
Minor Essay | 15% | 30/08/2013 |
Major Essay | 40% | 1/11/2013 |
MEDIA-WATCH JOURNAL | 25% | 16/10/2013 |
Due: N/A
Weighting: 10%
Each week you will prepare for the tutorials and lectures by completing the required readings. You will be given questions that you should keep in mind whilst studying the specified readings, and you are expected to contribute intelligently to class discussion. When studying the readings at home, it is recommended that you think about the core claims that the author/s are advancing, the data they draw on to support those claims, and the implications of those claims (e.g., how can those assertions be applied to the study of phenomena beyond the scope of the reading).
Due: each and every week
Weighting: 10%
Each week you'll be expected to complete a short report on the week's readings, answering special questions that are posted on ilearn from week to week. Of the 12 weeks of assigned readings, you are expected to complete at least 10 short reports, no longer than one page (typed). They are to be handed in during your tutorial to your teacher. You will not receive a mark or comments for these tasks; but they will each be read, so some effort is required of you. As with all tasks for this and other courses, plagiarism will be severly penalised.
Due: 30/08/2013
Weighting: 15%
The length of the minor essay is 1000 words. It is due Friday, August 30th. You will receive feedback for the minor essay that will help you improve your expression, essay structure, and the coherence of your argument for the major essay. Additionally, the minor essay is also of a comparable lenth to the Take Home exam questions; thus, it gives you an opportunity to practice developing and expressing an argument in a concise fashion.
In order to allow students the chance to summarise and analyse key material, students are asked to choose two readings from those provided in ilearn (assessment folder). A written summary in report form will address the following specific questions:
This report will give students the chance to reflect on and express ideas about economic activities from an anthropological perspective.
Due: 1/11/2013
Weighting: 40%
Essays are related to material from the unit and will require students to do independent research, both in the supplementary material list in the unit reader and outside these materials. The length of the major research essay is 2500 words.
Format: Your assignments should follow the standard essay format and referencing system required in anthropology. Please look up the writing guidelines on the Anthropology home page if you are unsure what this entails, but it basically requires in-text citation and a ‘references cited’ list at the end (with only those materials actually cited in the paper).
Your essays must be typed in 12-point format. Make sure all of the pages are numbered and that the essay is stapled. Correct grammar and spelling are required and part of the assessment for your written work will reflect this.Make sure you put an Anthropology cover-sheet on the front page and sign it. The people at the front desk will stamp it with the time and date received to confirm that you submitted the essay within the appropriate timeframe.
Due: 16/10/2013
Weighting: 25%
In groups of two, students will engage in a small-scale media-watch journal over the course of the semester. Each pair of students will make a ‘media journal’ (preferably hardcopy) that collates material to do with the history and organization of the global economy, covering design and security, sustainability and the environment, poverty and wealth, development and its critics, identity and consumption, inequality, work labour, etc. etc.
One key aspect of this media watch project is to select the categories under which you will archive material. Use no more than 4 headings.
Final submission of the portfolio involves two tasks:
· A brief introduction, explaining and justifying the categories you have selected to organize the material.
· A longer critical comment on the prevailing assumptions that inform or dominate the media reporting of the material in each of your different archives. You may choose to write your critical analysis on your materials at the end of each individual archive. Alternatively you might do it to conclude your media-watch journal, tying them all together in some way.
Referencing: you do not have to cite authors outside the media-watch material. If you want to, however, you are free to make a short reference list. As for the archive authors, just use their names in your commentary.
Length: no more than 1500 words, and no more than 30 articles.
Due Date: Media-watch journals should be submitted at the lecture inWeek 10, on Wednesday 16th October. At the lecture student groups will exchange their portfolio with one other group, to be returned the following week at the lecture (Wednesday 23rd October) for collection by the course convenors. Students are expected to write a short half-page report on each other’s work
Students are also required to attend one of four possible weekly tutorials. Tutorials run Wed 4.00pm-5.00pm in C4A320; Wed 5.00pm-6.00pm in W6B315; Thur 3.00pm-4.00pm in C5A401; and Thur 5.00pm-6.00pm in W5C310.
Changes Made to Previous Offerings of the Unit
The sample of subjects covered in lectures and tutes constitutes one of the main changes made to previous offerings of the unit. I have elected to focus largely upon my fieldwork experiences and areas of interest and expertise - i.e., I have modified aspects of this course to encompass the role that conflict and violence play in peoples' identities and economic activities. More directly, several weeks consider the nature of the macro- and micro-economic systems that prevail within environments where extreme scarcity is commonplace (refugee camps, developing countries, and conflict zones).
Additionally, the weighting and nature of the individual assessment tasks have been altered slightly. In terms of the nature of assessments, I have assigned a take-home examination to give students time to reflect on the subjects covered during the course and to reconsider academic and other materials provided (by me) and gathered (by you).
Tutorial participation and report essay writing tasks have been given more weight with respect to the final grades than in the past. This is to encourage students to complete the readings and involve themselves more intensely in class discussions.
OUTLINE OF LECTURES AND READINGS
The unit outline includes a short description of each lecture and tutorial followed by a listing of the readings for each week; these readings are available online.
WEEK ONE: What is Economic?
What do we mean by ‘economic’? What types of human activity do we call economic? And what might anthropology have to say about the economic activities of human beings? Do people everywhere behave in a relatively consistent fashion when deciding how to allocate resources, produce the necessities of life, or distribute what they make? What sorts of economic systems have anthropologists encountered in cultures around the world?
The introductory lecture will discuss the history of relations between anthropology and economics, the goals and requirements of this unit, and an introduction to the topics we will be discussing in this course.
NO TUTORIAL THIS WEEK
WEEK TWO: Rationality & Substantivism
The dominant model in neo-classical economics makes certain assumptions about what motivates human beings and how they make decisions, especially that they use a means-ends calculation when making decisions that economists call ‘rationality’. Anthropologists have disagreed, both with each other and economists, about whether or not these traits (such as rationality, utility maximization, and profit seeking etc.) exist amongst all people, or if the terms are just too general. Some have argued that the terms are circular – for example, by definition, you are pursuing ‘utility’ with every decision you make to allocate your resources; therefore, we can be confident that you will always choose the option that gives you the most utility (rather than act out of fear, loyalty, morality, laziness, short-sightedness, habit, etc).
In this lecture, we will discuss some of the most basic assumptions of economics as well as consider the polarised anthropological responses to neo-classical economic assumptions. We will ask if the economic model of ‘markets’ resembles actual markets or daily economic activity; in particular, we will ask if market economics describes non-economic behaviour.
Tutorial Questions
What do economists treat as universal human traits? What sorts of factors might shape your decisions about how to spend money, what occupation to pursue, how to invest time and resources, and other economic choices? To what extent is economic behaviour embedded within social life in Western and non-Western Society?
Tutorial Readings
Smith, Adam, 1910 (1776) Excerpt from An Inquiry in the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Volume One. Pp. 4-19. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Antonioni, P and Sean Masaki Flynn, (2007) Getting to Know Homo Economicus, The Utility Maximizing Consumer. In Economics for Dummies Pp. 191-209
Recommended
Granovetter, M., 1985 Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, Pp. 481-510
Oritz, S., Decisions and Choices: The Rationality of Economic Actors. In A Handbook of Economic Anthropology. Carrier, J.G., 2005, Pp. 59-77
WEEK THREE: Irrationality
If we are all rational actors, as some economic theories seem to argue, what are we to make of crazy, hare-brained get-rich-quick schemes? For instance, every year, millions of dollars are defrauded from westerners as a consequence of Nigerian 4-1-9 scams. Despite the obvious risk of sending large sums of money to persons who explicitly introduce themselves as corrupt African bureaucrats, such scams are efficacious largely because they play off the distorted understandings about Africa that some westerners hold.
Likewise, traditional societies in the South Pacific follow religions characterised by a seemingly ‘irrational’ use of resources. Following World War II, a number of groups in the pacific islands became the cradle of religious movements that awaited the return of yankee G.Is who had brought material wealth during the war. Called Cargo Cults because they awaited goods from abroad, these groups are an example of how people who have not fully understood the economic processes around them and yet have tried to harness economic power.
And finally what are we to make of the billions of dollars that move between migrants in developed countries and their friends and family in developing countries in the form of remittances? The total sum of such flows eclipses the total sum of money poured into official development and relief projects. This lecture looks at the role of irrational forces in the economic behaviours of social actors; special attention is given to my research into the motivations of resettled refugees to support their friends and family living in refugee camps in West Africa.
Tutorial Questions
How are cargo cults, like John Frum’s, similar to Nigerian 419 scams? How do both economic institutions propose to work? What part does faith and trust play in cargo cults, 419 schemes, and more generally in our own economic confidence? In what ways are Nigerian ‘419’ schemes reflective of the social, political, and cultural structures in both Africa and in the West?
Tutorial Reading
Smith, D 2007: ‘Urgent Business Relationship’: Nigerian E-Mail Scams, in A Culture of Corruption: Everyday forms of Deception and Popular Discontent in Nigeria, Pp. 53-88, Princeton University Press
Raffaele, P, 2006. In John They Trust. Smithsonian Magazine 36 (11) (February 2006): 70-77
WEEK FOUR: The Gift
In his book The Gift, French anthropologist and sociologist Marcel Mauss famously contrasted gifts with commodities. He asked: what power is in the gift that compels the recipient to give a gift in return? Ironically, he concluded that gifts were ultimately inalienable, that is, they retain a connection to their giver, building a relationship of reciprocity.
During this week’s lecture and discussion, we will think more about the rules of gift giving in our own and others’ cultures, as well as how exchanges of money, objects and assistance form an important part of our social relationships. Although economic models tend to assume that transactions are determined only by rational consideration of one’s own benefit, the relationships we actually observe often involve many other social considerations. We will look at different forms of reciprocity across a variety of cultures.
Tutorial Questions
To whom do you give gifts and what sorts of gifts? What are the ‘rules’ of the gift? What does it mean to receive a gift? When do we give gifts without expectation of reciprocity?
Tutorial Readings – Required
Mauss, M. 1967 The Gift and Especially the Obligation to Return It. In The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Society. Pp. 1-16. New York and London: W. W. Norton.
Zelizer, V A 1996, Payments and Social Ties. Sociological Forum 14 (3) 481-495.
Recommended
Ruth, J A., Otnes CC, Brunel F. F., 1999. Gift Receipt and the Reformulation of Interpersonal Relationships. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 385-402
WEEK FIVE: Livelihoods and Identity Work
Amongst other things, economic anthropology examines how people engage with their environment in order to eek out a living. Building on the core concept of ‘embeddedness’, this lecture examines the concept of ‘livelihoods’ as a means of understanding ‘production’. I will discuss the notion of ‘identity work’ in order to explore the ways in which livelihoods are attained under conditions of extreme hardship. Drawing on my fieldwork experience in the internet cafes of Buduburam refugee camp, I will describe how performances of ‘refugee identity’ in online chat rooms enable Liberians in exile to elicit resources from distant – often unfamiliar – others.
Tutorial Questions
In what ways is the notion of livelihoods useful for the analysis of economic activities, in particular the concept of work? Why, do you think, has the notion been popular in refugee studies? What are the limitations of such a notion in humanitarian contexts?
Tutorial Readings
Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Kyei, P., Adjaloo, M., Rapoo, G., Kilpatrick, K., 2008, Linkages Between Livelihood Opportunities and Refugee-Host Relations: Learning From The Experiences Of Liberian Camp-Based Refugees in Ghana. Journal of Refugee Studies, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press Pp. 230-252
WEEK SIX: Wage Labour and Resistance
This lecture examines the ways in which ‘work’ has been conceptualised by leading philosophers and sociologists. We will consider the different functions of production, the organisation of production in capitalist – and not least traditional - societies, and the consequences of such modes of organisation upon our experience of work.
We will also consider the forms of resistance that have emerged in different workplaces, in both western and traditional societies.
Far from being passive objects that are manipulated by employers, workers around the world have developed innovative ways of expressing discontent with prevailing work conditions. The so-called ‘weapons of the weak’ are explored in this lecture.
Tutorial Questions
How important is control over time to the experience of work? How might workers respond to - and negotiate - the culture(s) of the workplace? What social, cultural or political factors shape the forms that resistance that individuals employ when at work?
Tutorial Readings
Ong, A,. The Production of Possession: Spirits and the Multinational Corporation in Malaysia. American Ethnologist, Vol. 15 no. 1.
WEEK SEVEN: Commodities and Consuming
Commodity fetishism, described by Marx and discussed by many theorists, has been one of the most important concepts for understanding illusions created by market relations. That is, many economists argue that the market and market transactions are a model for transparent social relations; Marx argues that the form of the commodity conceals more than it reveals, hiding the social relations and conditions of its production. In the end, Marx argues, commodities seem to have the qualities of people, as if the objects were themselves animated. This lecture considers both the classical and Marxist theories of commodities, how they are given prices, and what effect this has on the price of labour, part of a persons life.
If the commodity fetish helps us understand the ways that social relations of production are concealed by the market, under contemporary capitalism it is clear that many people see themselves as constituted in their acts of consumption. That is, what we buy and consume is often treated as our truest and freest expression of our essential self. Material restrictions, demands that we work, and social constraints, from this perspective, are all inauthentic obstacles to our self-expression in buying.
During this week’s lecture, we will talk about theorists who argue that our choices of what we consume are shaped by powerful cultural and structural systems. Instead of being an expression of a purely individual independent self, these theorists argue that consumption obeys various logics. Some acts of consumption may resist dominant frameworks of meaning for things, but others merely reproduce forms of distinction among people. That is, we try to create difference in part through what we consume, defining the kind of people we are or are not through ‘taste’.
Tutorial Questions
How does Koptyoff’s discussion of the biographies of things build upon Marx’s idea of a commodity as a fetish? From these two authors, how do we better understand commoditization? What does commoditization accomplish? Do you have non-commoditized objects in your life? What are they and why are they ‘not-commoditized’?
Tutorial Readings
Marx, K. 1867. Section 4. The Fetishism of Commodities and the Secret Thereof. In Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1 Pp. 76-87. New York
Koptyoff, I The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as a Process. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Arjun Appadurai, ed. Pp. 64-91. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press
WEEK EIGHT: Globalization and Volunteer Work
The process of globalisation is both the consequence of rapid technological innovation, as well as the result of neo-liberal rationality. For Foucault and other scholars interested in governmentality, neo-liberalism is the 'way of doing things' that many countries have adopted since the 1970s, which consists of using the free-market mechanism for the government or management of society.
Neo-liberalism holds that the market should organise relations between companies, as well as relations between individuals and between communities. All of which are seen as micro-enterprises that should be autonomous and compete with one another in search of resources and manpower. In this context, many academics and policy makers have paid increasing attention to the role of volunteer work as a means of checking the power of the sovereign state and as constituting a means of resistance to market ideology.
This lecture discusses the various ethical positions that international volunteers - e.g., aid workers, volunteer tourists, and NGO interns - come to occupy in local economies. Such individuals are framed by academics and policy makers as: a means by which the wealth of western nations may be redistributed; a force for the production of social capital for 'isolated' groups; and as consumers of poverty for tourism and various personal purposes (e.g., their latent or explicit interests in building CVs and careers).
Tutorial Discussion
In what ways can volunteer work be regarded as an economic activity? How might global forces act on local systems of production, consumption and distribution? What positive forces might voluntourism have on local economies? What are its negative implications?
Tutorial Readings
Guttendag, D., 2009 The Possible Negative Effects of Volunteer Tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11. Pp. 537-551
Simpson, K., 2004 Doing Development, the Gap Year, and a Popular Practice of Development. Journal of International Development. 16, Pp. 681-692
WEEK NINE: Money
Classical philosophical studies of money have described it as a kind of social acid and economic lubricant. On the one hand, money dissolved previous social ties, just as wage labour eventually undermined serfdom and slavery; on the other, money made transactions easier, smoother, and faster, so that trade did not have to wait for the slower price of barter. We tend to see money as transparent, as having inherent in it; our day-to-day activities virtually demand that we have confidence in the concrete value of coloured paper notes.
In fact, money takes many forms across cultures. Its ubiquity in our lives makes us unaware of the extraordinary social accomplishment that money represents. In this lecture, we will talk about some of the different forms that money can take, and what these unusual forms teach us about the almost magical properties of our own currencies, including new forms of money generated by financial markets, electronic banking, credit cards, and other technological innovations.
Tutorial Questions
Is money a universal means of exchange? What is meant by special purpose moneys and why are anthropologists interested in them? Are there any special purpose moneys in your life?
Tutorial Readings
Parry, J.P. On The Moral Perils of Exchange in Parry, J.P., and Bloch M., Money and The Morality of Exchange. CambridgeUniversity Press pp., 64-93
WEEK TEN: Reading Week
WEEK ELEVEN: Poverty, Society, and (Structural) Violence
The gap between the rich and the poor is immense. For many of us in the developed world – or in the middle and upper classes of the developed world – it is almost inconceivable that anyone could survive on a daily income less than we might spend on a cup of coffee.
During this lecture, we will consider the objective measures of poverty in the world, together with the social causes and consequences of extreme inequality. Although we tend to think of deprivation as the outcome of a simple lack (i.e., a ‘scarcity’ of money, of resources, of skills), some societies are structured so as to deny opportunities to some members; for example, we will consider economist Amartya Sen’s discussion of ‘entitlement problems’ and the possibility of famine, as well as the controversial theory that a ‘culture of poverty’ engenders socio-economic deprivation. Finally, we look also at the ways in poverty is related to affluence, mapping out the precise nature of the social-relationships that engender deprivation.
Tutorial Questions
What social and political phenomena produce poverty? What measures, do you think. would be required to challenge – or indeed disrupt - the ‘structural violence’ that poverty entails?
Tutorial Readings
Farmer, P., 2004, On Suffering and Structural Violence: A View From Below. Current Anthropology, vol. 45 no. 305-325
WEEK TWELVE: Experiencing Poverty
Turning our attention away from the scholarly and the institutional understandings of poverty, as well as its social causes and the consequences, this lecture explores the ways in which poverty is experienced. We look first at the ways in which poverty is represented in the popular media. Then, we explore a sample of the ways in which experience has been theorised, and the extent to which the notion of experience is relevant to a better understanding the struggles of the poor. Finally, we look at the espoused answers to deprivation and poverty, and question the degree to which the poor’s perspectives, needs and experiences are addressed by such solutions.
Tutorial Questions
What does it really mean to be poor and how does poverty manifest itself? What types of choices do the poor face?
Tutorial Readings
Abhijit, B., and Duflo, E., 2006. The Economic Lives of the Poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 141-167
Desjairlais, R,. Struggling Along: The Possibility for Experience Amongst the Homeless Mentally Ill, American Anthropologist, Vol. 96, no. 94 Pp. 886-901
WEEK THIRTEEN: Economies in Crisis and Conflict
Contemporary neo-Liberal theory proposes that ‘free trade’ is essential to national security and common prosperity. At the same time, liberal thinkers believe that ‘non-liberal’ economies and black markets foster crisis, as well as constitute a threat to national and international peace. Particular kinds of economies – and the so-called ‘weak states’ in which they are ‘embedded’ – are thus linked to disorder, crisis and conflict, both at home and abroad.
Such understandings do not acknowledge the ways that contemporary forms of liberalism may promote insecurity and conflict; nor how non-liberal and black markets in the midst of conflict zones may express the failings of free-trade, or function to re-structure and re-organize the inequalities latent in the prevailing socio-economic system. Put differently, neo-liberal philosophy has yet to grapple with the ways that economies in conflict zones produce – and express – certain kinds of ‘order’.
This lecture looks at economies in the midst of crisis from a macro- and micro-economic perspective. It raises questions about the actual relationships between ‘weak states’ and capitalism, as well considers the ways that persons within conflict zones behave in the market under conditions of extreme scarcity.
Tutorial Questions
How might conditions of extreme scarcity – as well as limited social mobility – nurture eruptions of conflict? How might the prospect of wealth generation nurture the outbreak of violence? What economic functions does conflict serve for combatants in conflict zones?
Tutorial Readings
Outram, Q., 2007 Its terminal either way: An Analysis of Armed Conflict in Liberia, 1989-1996. Review of African Political Economy, 24:73, Pp. 355-371
Schetter, O., ‘The Bazaar economy of Afghanistan’ access online at http://www.zef.de/fileadmin/webfiles/downloads/conferences/Bazar_Economy_of_Afghanistan.pdf
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central. Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Academic Honesty Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
Assessment Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
Grading Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
Grade Appeal Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
Grievance Management Policy http://mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grievance_management/policy.html
Special Consideration Policy http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/special_consideration/policy.html
In addition, a number of other policies can be found in the Learning and Teaching Category of Policy Central.
Macquarie University provides a range of Academic Student Support Services. Details of these services can be accessed at: http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
Details of these services can be accessed at http://www.student.mq.edu.au/ses/.
If you wish to receive IT help, we would be glad to assist you at http://informatics.mq.edu.au/help/.
When using the university's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students and it outlines what can be done.
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will have enquiring minds and a literate curiosity which will lead them to pursue knowledge for its own sake. They will continue to pursue learning in their careers and as they participate in the world. They will be capable of reflecting on their experiences and relationships with others and the environment, learning from them, and growing - personally, professionally and socially.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be aware of and have respect for self and others; to be able to work with others as a leader and a team player; to have a sense of connectedness with others and country; and to have a sense of mutual obligation. Our graduates should be informed and active participants in moving society towards sustainability.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Date | Description |
---|---|
16/11/2012 | The Description was updated. |