Rationale for Modes of Assessment
- Attendance at tutorials assists students develop their understanding of the subject through the semester, and engage in discussion and problem-solving with peers.
- Topic Quizzes ensure students complete and understand essential points in required reading and are able to understand and apply key concepts covered in lectures and tutorials. These quizzes are completed progressively through the semester to assist students to monitor and self-manage their own learning. Quizzes start in the second week of the semester and allow students to receive “low risk” feedback on their grasp of the topics from the beginning of the unit.
- The problem solving exercise is designed to assess understanding, problem solving and application of concepts, principles and strategies covered in the unit.
- The media exercise addresses understanding of the relevant principles and the ability to effectively and concisely communicate an argument.
- The final examination provides a summative assessment of understanding of unit content.
Assessment Weighting
There are several components of the assessment in this unit. All components must be completed. The overall pass for the unit will be determined by the weighted total of the passing scores for individual components. You do not need to pass every component but muse get an overall pass. Students must meet the attendance requirement to pass the unit.
Late Submission
Late submissions will not be accepted except where an extension has been negotiated prior to the due date. In all other circumstacnes, late submissions will receive a mark of zero.
Resubmission
Students are required to gain an overall pass on the unit but do not have to pass all assessment components. If you perform poorly on one component, you may compensate for this with an improved performance in the other component(s).Resubmission of assessments is not permitted.
If any student has concern about the marking of an assessment, they must:
- Consult the member of staff who marked the work.
-
If there is no satisfactory resolution, an appeal should be made in writing to the unit convenor within one week of the marked assessment being returned or of results being made available. The student should explicitly state the basis of the appeal.
The unit convenor will review the marking and may, at their discretion, ask for re-marking by a second marker. If re-marking by a second marker is judged appropriate, the final mark will normally be the average of the two marks awarded for the assessment task. Students should note that the revised mark for the task may be higher, the same or lower than the original mark. Please note that it is MUSEC policy to double mark all failing assessments.
The decision of the unit convenor is final.
Students should refer to the Handbook of Postgraduate Studies for information about appeals against a final grade. The Handbook is at http://handbook.mq.edu.au/2013/
You should also read the policy at http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/gradeappeal/policy.html
The first step of the appeal process must be made within 20 days of the release of the unit results. As for requests for special consideration, appeals against finals grades must be made throughhttp://ask.mq.edu.au.
The University defines plagiarism in its rules:"Plagiarism involves using the work of another person and presenting it as one's own." Plagiarism is a serious breach of the University's rules and carries significant penalties.
Academic Honesty
You must read the University's practices and procedures on Academic Honesty. These on the web at: http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/policy.html
The policies and procedures explain what academic honesty and plagiarism are, how to avoid plagiarism, the procedures that will be taken in cases of suspected plagiarism, and the penalties if you are found guilty.Penalties may include a deduction of marks, failure in the unit, and/or referral to the University Discipline Committee. Details of possible penalties are athttp://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/academic_honesty/schedule_penalties.html
Other important points:
- Close paraphrasing of another persons’ writing is considered to be plagiarism. You must express ideas using your own words.
-
Claim of ignorance of the University policy on plagiarism is NOT a defence within MUSEC. If you do not understand the preceding information, please seek advice from a member of the academic staff.
The University Assessment Policy, Code of Practice and Procedures are available at
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy.html
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/policy_code_of_practice.html
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/assessment/procedure.html
Your overall unit result will be assigned a standardised numerical grade (SNG) on your University transcript. High Distinction grades are assigned a mark between 85 and 100, Distinction grades between 75 and 84, Credit grades between 65 and 74, Pass grades between 50 and 64, and Fail grades below 50. For further information, see the Grading Policy.
PLEASE NOTE THAT SNGs ARE NOT PERCENTAGES.
SNGs CORRESPOND WITH LETTER GRADES AWARDED THROUGHOUT THE UNIT (I.E., HD, D, CR P, F) BUT DO NOT DIRECTLY CORRESPOND PERCENTAGE MARKS FOR INDIVIDUAL ASSSESSMENTS.
The following generic grade descriptors are applied across the university.
High Distinction Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline.
Distinction Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.
Credit Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline.
Pass Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes.
Fail Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.