Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Iliana Skrebneva
Owain Matthews
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
ECHE340 and ECHP327
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
In this unit, students extend their capacity to connect pedagogy and planning, developing units of work, and integrated learning. As a capstone unit, ECHE450 enables students to bring together their knowledge, skills and experiences as a university student to assist them in making the transition to the next stage in their career. This unit gives students the opportunity to consolidate what they have learnt, reflect on and assess their professional strengths and skills in the context of their future career path.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Professional Teaching Standard | 30% | No | 20/8/18 |
Education for Tomorrow | 30% | No | Part A 5 Oct; Part B see guide |
Teaching Philosophy | 35% | No | 5/11/18 |
ASSET Survey | 5% | No | 1/9;15/9;1/10;15/10;1/11 |
Due: 20/8/18
Weighting: 30%
In this assessment pre-service teachers focus on their progress towards the Professional Teaching Standards.
Due: Part A 5 Oct; Part B see guide
Weighting: 30%
Part A: Using lecture content from weeks 1-4, you are to work in groups of 3-4 and select an area of interest that you would like to research further.
Part B: This part of the assessment is individual work. You are to take notes and reflections on what your peers present in tutorials. Part B is due one week following the presentation.
Due: 5/11/18
Weighting: 35%
Produce a succinct statement that might appear at the front of your Professional Portfolio.
Due: 1/9;15/9;1/10;15/10;1/11
Weighting: 5%
Participation in Annual Student Survey of Education for Teaching.
Lectures
Access and technical assistance
This unit requires students to use several ICT and software skills:
Using Turnitin
APA Style Central This referencing guide is accessed through the Library’s Multisearch function. It provides tools and templates to assist you to correct format citations in APA 6.
Week |
Topic and Speaker |
Recommended readings and assessments |
1
30/7/18 |
Topic: Learning Communities
Lecture: Ms Sanobia Palkhiwala |
Agbenyega, J.S & Klibthong, Sunanta. Transforming selves for inclusive practice: Experiences of early childhood preservice teachers (2012). Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5). Available from: :<https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=768582614598438;res=IELAPA> ISSN: 1835-517X.
Professional Teaching standards: https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/wcm/connect/8658b2fa-62d3-40ca-a8d9-02309a2c67a1/australian-professional-standards-teachers.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID
|
2
6/8/18 |
Topic: Intercultural and Indigenous Understandings and Histories
Lecture: Ms. Tamika Worrrell |
Hunt, J. (2013). Engagement with Indigenous communities in key sectors. Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. Closing the Gap Clearinghouse (Australia) ; Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) ; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare |
3
13/8/18 |
Topic: International Conditions of ‘Childhood’
Lecture: Ms. Sanobia Palkhiwala |
Highfield, T., & Goudkamp, M. (2016). Refugees, asylum seekers and an anti-bias approach in early childhood. In R. R. Scarlet (Ed.),The anti-bias approach in early childhood (3rd ed., pp. 289-296). Sydney, Australia: Multiverse.
Douglas Bell, Raynice E. Jean-Sigur & Yanghee A. Kim (2015) Going Global in Early Childhood Education, Childhood Education, 91:2, 90-100, DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2015.1018782
|
4
20/8/18 |
Topic: Diversity, Bias and Critical Approaches
Lecture: Dr. Zinnia Mevawalla |
Walters, S. (2008). Fairness first: Learning from Martin Luther King Jr. and Ruby Bridges. In A. Pelo (Ed.), Rethinking early childhood education (pp. 151-154). Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools, Ltd.
Quintero, E. (2007). Chapter 10: Critical pedagogy and young children’s worlds. In P. McClaren & J.L. Kincheloe (Eds)., Critical pedagogy: where are we now? Vol, 299, p. 201-207). New York: Peter Lang Publishing. Assignment 1 due: Monday August 20th 2018 by 10pm |
5-7 |
No lectures or tutorials for 3 weeks |
Assignment 4: Complete Part 1 of ASSET Survey (1st September) Assignment 4: Complete Part 2 of ASSET Survey (15th September) |
Break 17/9/18-28/9/18 |
Mid-Semester Break |
OCD 1 Wednesday 19th Sep 2018 (29 Wallys Walk room 136) OCD 2 Thursday 20th Sep 2018 (29 Wallys Walk room 136) |
8
1/10/18 |
Topic: Inclusive Student Participation.
Lecture: Ms Katie Wright |
Cologon, K. (2014). Better together: Inclusive education in the early years. In K. Cologon (Ed.), Inclusive education in the early years: Right from the start (pp. 1-26). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Cologon, K. & Thomas, C. (2014). Ableism, disablism and the early years. In K. Cologon (Ed.), Inclusive education in the early years: Right from the start (pp. 27-48). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press
Assessment 2 (part A) due: During week 8 and 9 tutorials (internals) and during OCD2 (externals) Assignment 4: Complete Part 3 of ASSET Survey (1st October) |
9
8/10/18 |
Topic: Children as Active Citizens
Lecture: Ms Aliza Salvador |
Larkins, C. (2014). Enacting children’s citizenship: Developing understandings of how children enact themselves as citizens though actions and acts of citizenship. Childhood, 21(1), 7-21. Doi: 10.1177/0907568213481815
Moss, P. (2010). We cannot continue as we are: The educator in an Education for survival. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), p.8-19. Assessment 2 (part B) due: one week after tutorial presentations |
10
15/10/18 |
Topic: Contextualising Pedagogy
Lecture: Ms Sanobia Palkhiwala |
Silva, J. M., & Langhout, R. D. (2011). Cultivating agents of change in children. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 61-91. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473447
Assessment 4: Complete Part 4 of ASSET Survey (15th October) |
11
22/10/18 |
Topic: Pre-Service Teacher Reflections Lecture: TBC |
Burgess, J., Robertson, G., & Patterson, C. (2010). Curriculum implementation: decisions of early childhood teachers. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood; 35(3) p.51-59. ISSN: 1836-9391
|
12
29/10/18 |
Topic: Supporting the Pre-Service Teacher
Lecture: TBC |
McArdle, F., & Ryan, S. (2017) Reflection: reinvigorating a key professional practice in teacher education, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(4), 275-278, DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2017.1403213 Assessment 4: Complete Part 5 of ASSET Survey (1st November) |
13
5/11/18 |
Topic: Professional Identity and Advocacy
Lecture: TBC |
Adoniou, M. (2013). Preparing Teachers – The Importance of Connecting Contexts in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n8.7
Brown ,A & Grigg, J (2017). Critical narrative as a framework for professional boarder crossing in early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,. 18(3) 333–345 Assessment 3 due: Monday 5th November by 10pm |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Undergraduate students seeking more policy resources can visit the Student Policy Gateway (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/student-policy-gateway). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
If you would like to see all the policies relevant to Learning and Teaching visit Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central).
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/getting-started/student-conduct
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Attendance for undergraduate units
All tutorials begin in Week 1 of Session.
Activities completed during weekly tutorials (internal) or on campus days (external) are essential for building the core knowledge and/or skills required to demonstrate the learning outcomes of this unit [and to meet the AITSL Graduate Teacher Standards and/or ACECQA requirements]. Attendance at all tutorials or on campus days is expected and the roll will be taken.
Students are required to attend the tutorial in which they are enrolled. Any changes to tutorial enrollments must be completed officially through e-student. Please do not contact the unit convenor requesting a change.
Unit Expectations
Students are expected to read weekly readings before completing tasks and attending tutorials
Students are expected to listen/attend weekly lectures before completing tasks and attending tutorials
Note: It is not the responsibility of unit staff to contact students who have failed to submit assignments. If you have any missing items of assessment, it is your responsibility to make contact with the unit convenor.
Electronic Communication
It is the student’s responsibility to check all electronic communication on a regular weekly basis. Communication may occur via:
Official MQ Student Email Address
The Dialogue function on iLearn
Other iLearn communication functions
General assessment information
Assignment extensions and late penalties
Applications for extensions must be made via AskMQ at https://ask.mq.edu.au as a Special Consideration request before the submission date. Students who experience a disruption to their studies through ill-health or misadventure are able to apply for this request. Extensions can only be granted if they meet the Special Considerations policy and are submitted via https://ask.mq.edu.au/. This will ensure consistency in the consideration of such requests is maintained.
In general, there should be no need for extensions except through illness or misadventure that would be categorised as unavoidable disruption according to the University definition of same, see: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/my-study-program/special-consideration
Late submissions without extension will receive a penalty of 5% reduction of the total possible mark for each day late (including weekends and public holidays). You are reminded that submitting even just 1 day late could be the difference between passing and failing a unit. Late penalties are applied by unit convenors or their delegates after tasks are assessed.
No assessable work will be accepted after the return/release of marked work on the same topic. If a student is still permitted to submit on the basis of unavoidable disruption, an alternative topic may be set.
Students should keep an electronic file of all assessments. Claims regarding "lost" assessments cannot be made if the file cannot be produced. It is also advisable to keep an electronic file of all drafts and the final submission on a USB untouched/unopened after submission. This can be used to demonstrate easily that the assessment has not been amended after the submission date.
Requesting a remark of an assignment
If you have evidence that your task has been incorrectly assessed against the grade descriptors you can request a re-mark. To request a re-mark you need to contact the unit convenor within 7 days of the date of return of the assignment and provide a detailed assessment of your script against the task criteria. Evidence from your assignment must be provided to support your judgements.
Note: Failed assessments can not be re-submitted as they are all double-marked as a part of the moderation process.
Please note: The outcome of a re-mark may be a higher/lower or unchanged grade. Grades are standards referenced and effort is NOT a criterion.
Online quizzes are an individual assessment task and MUST BE COMPLETED by each student individually. Similarities in responses between students will be checked and investigated for possible collusion. Please see the Academic Honesty Handbook for more information.
Assessment Presentation & Submission Guidelines
Please follow these guidelines when you submit each assignment:
Allow a left and right-hand margin of at least 2cm in all assignments.
Please type all assignments using 12-point font and 1.5 spacing.
All assessments must be submitted through Turnitin in .doc or .pdf format
It is the onus of the student to ensure that all assessments are successfully submitted through Turnitin.
Faculty assignment cover sheets are NOT required.
Draft Submissions & Turnitin Originality Reports
Students may use Turnitin’s Originality Report as a learning tool to improve their academic writing if this option is made available in the unit.
Students are strongly encouraged to upload a draft copy of each assessment to Turnitin at least one week prior to the due date to obtain an Originality Report.
The Originality Report provides students with a similarity index that may indicate if plagiarism has occurred. Students will be able to make amendments to their drafts prior to their final submission on the due date.
Generally, one Originality Report is generated every 24 hours up to the due date.
Please note:
Students should regularly save a copy of all assignments before submission,
Unless there are exceptional circumstances, no assessment will be accepted after the date that the assessment has been returned to other students.
Students are responsible for checking that their submission has been successful and has been submitted by the due date and time.
University policy on grading
Criteria for awarding grades for assessment tasks
Assignments will be awarded grades ranging from HD to F according to guidelines set out in the University's Grading Policy. The following descriptive criteria are included for your information.
Criteria for awarding grades in the unit
Students will be awarded grades ranging from HD to F according to guidelines set out in the policy: https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policies/assessment-in-effect-from-session-2-2016
The following generic grade descriptors provide university-wide standards for awarding final grades.
Grade |
Descriptor |
HD (High Distinction) |
Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline. |
D (Distinction) |
Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. |
Cr (Credit) |
Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline. |
P (Pass). |
Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes |
F (Fail) |
Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline. |
Withdrawing from this UG Unit
If you are considering withdrawing from this unit, please seek academic advice by writing to https://ask.mq.edu.au before doing so as this unit may be a co-requisite or prerequisite for units in the following semesters and may impact on your progression through the degree.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will have enquiring minds and a literate curiosity which will lead them to pursue knowledge for its own sake. They will continue to pursue learning in their careers and as they participate in the world. They will be capable of reflecting on their experiences and relationships with others and the environment, learning from them, and growing - personally, professionally and socially.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
As local citizens our graduates will be aware of indigenous perspectives and of the nation's historical context. They will be engaged with the challenges of contemporary society and with knowledge and ideas. We want our graduates to have respect for diversity, to be open-minded, sensitive to others and inclusive, and to be open to other cultures and perspectives: they should have a level of cultural literacy. Our graduates should be aware of disadvantage and social justice, and be willing to participate to help create a wiser and better society.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be aware of and have respect for self and others; to be able to work with others as a leader and a team player; to have a sense of connectedness with others and country; and to have a sense of mutual obligation. Our graduates should be informed and active participants in moving society towards sustainability.
This graduate capability is supported by: