Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Convenor
Louise D'Arcens
Contact via By email
Level 2, North Wing, Australian Hearing Hub
By appointment
Guest lecturer
John Severn
Contact via By email
n/a
n/a
Antonina Harbus
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
3
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
6cp in ENGL units at 200 level
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
The unit considers a broad range of Shakespeare's writings in relation to writings by his contemporaries and by his successors – dramatists as well as non-dramatists. In doing so it examines how those texts at once represent and engage with issues and problems in the culture of early modern, or Renaissance, England. Those issues and problems include: issues of genre and of sexuality in verse of the 1590s; problems evoked in representations of tragic selfhood; problems associated with religious and political conflict; and problems arising from English portrayals both of England and of life outside it.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
In the case of each assignment, please also consult the 300-level grade descriptors, which can be viewed under "marking rubrics".
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Close Reading Task | 15% | No | 12.59pm 26 August, 2018 |
Drama critical analysis | 25% | No | 11.59pm, 5 October 2018 |
Final Research Essay | 40% | No | 11.59pm 11 November 2018 |
Class participation | 20% | No | Each teaching week |
Due: 12.59pm 26 August, 2018
Weighting: 15%
Brief description:
The Reading Task will be a 1000-word essay.
Choose from one of the following options:
OR
·This is predominantly a close-reading exercise rather than a research exercise. Please limit secondary material to no more than 1-2 sources.
·Concentrate on your English expression: write lucid, concise, grammatical sentences.
·Check your spelling and proof-read your response carefully before submission.
Due: 11.59pm, 5 October 2018
Weighting: 25%
Brief description:
The Drama Critical Analysis task will be a 1500-word essay.
Choose from ONE of the following options:
1. Analyse the use of no fewer than three dramatic techniques in the depiction of human desire in EITHER William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night OR Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.
2. Compare the use of at least three dramatic techniques in the depiction of human desire in William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night AND Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus.
Dramatic techniques include (but are not limited to)
Plot / dramatic structure
Dialogue, incl. use of verse or prose, use of soliloquy
Staging and use of space / props
Embodiment of actors
Dramatic irony
·Check your spelling and proof-read your response carefully before submission.
.
Due: 11.59pm 11 November 2018
Weighting: 40%
Brief description:
2500 words (includes all quotations and footnotes/references, but not the bibliography / works cited) (40% of the final grade)
The topics and questions for this Essay are designed to encourage independent analysis and research. Students will be asked to analyse texts closely, to link them, to suggest how they represent preoccupations in English Renaissance culture, and to engage with commentary on those texts. Since the final essay is in lieu of an exam, the paper is graded, with a general comment, but not annotated. Students wishing to have feedback on the essay can make an appointment to discuss it.
A text discussed in Assignment 1 or 2 cannot be a focal text in the Final Essay, unless negotiated with Louise D’Arcens.
·With an essay of this length, it is important that you create an argument and support it with evidence from your primary texts and references to your secondary (i.e., critical and theoretical) readings.
·This is a research essay. You are expected to use at least 4-6 sources apart from your primary texts. You may use material from this Handbook, but, if needed, should also do some independent research to locate material of specific relevance to your topic.
·Concentrate on your English expression: write lucid, concise, grammatical sentences.
·Check your spelling and proof-read the essay carefully before submission.
NB: “No more than two/three texts” means any number from one to three can be discussed. A collection of poems by a single author can be considered a single text; but if you are planning to include numerous poems, please discuss this with Louise D’Arcens.
Write an essay on ONE of the following topics.
1. Consider the representation of gender and / or race in no more than two texts you have studied in the unit.
2. Discuss the different functions of soliloquies in three plays that you have studied this semester (that is, focus on at least one soliloquy from each play).
3. How are revenge and self-destruction linked--or not--by Shakespeare and by one other author?
4. What theoretical approach to Shakespeare--that is, what literary, historical, or ideological theory--have you found most useful in reading his texts? In your answer, discuss no more than three Shakespearean plays that you have studied this semester.
5. Examine portrayals of the divine, or of religious experience, by no more than three authors whose work you have studied in this unit: what do you see as their main differences between and among those portrayals?
6. Do you think a ‘female voice’ can be detected in early modern English literature? You might wish to consider how, or whether, women writers present female subjectivity differently from male authors. Your response should include no more than three authors.
7. What attitudes to male competitiveness, possessiveness, or ambition are presented by no more than three writers studied in this unit?
8. Devise a topic of your own choosing—but consult with Louise D’Arcens beforehand.
Due: Each teaching week
Weighting: 20%
There is a one-hour tutorial each week, beginning in week 2. Attendance at tutorials is compulsory, and is a prerequisite for both fulfilling the requirements of the unit and for earning the tutorial participation mark. Attendance at tutorials is only a prerequisite for the tutorial mark. Active participation in tutorial discussiom, showing significant preparation beforehand, is necessary to earn a good mark.
Students must: attend all tutorials; submit the three written assessment tasks in this subject. Attendance at lectures is strongly advised.
Tutorial (1 hour)
I-Learn
(as in previous delivery of unit)
Written assessment tasks are to be submitted via Turnitin.
Extensions will be granted only for medical or other exceptional reasons.
Required and recommended texts and/or materials |
S. Greenblatt, et al., The Norton Shakespeare: Essential Plays/The Sonnets
S. Greenblatt, et. al., The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Ninth Edition, Volume B
Recommended secondary materials are outlined in full in the ENGL309 Unit Handbook, and will be available through the ENGL309 iLearn site.
Week 1 |
LECTURE Introduction to the Unit, and "What was the Renaissance? |
TUTORIAL No tutorial |
Week 2 |
Petrarchan sonnet and its English legacy:
|
Periodisation: The meaning of 'the Renaissance' |
Week 3 |
John Donne: heavenly/earthly love
|
Sonnets by various authors (listed in unit handbook) |
Week 4 |
Twelfth Night, Shakespeare |
John Donne's poetry
|
Week 5 |
Twelfth Night, Shakespeare
|
Twelfth Night |
Week 6 |
Women's Voices in the Renaissance |
Twelfth Night |
Week 7 |
World and Ambition: Doctor Faustus, Christopher Marlowe |
Women's Voices in the Renaissance |
Week 8 |
Assignment 2 strategies
|
Doctor Faustus |
Week 9 |
England and the World: Othello, Shakespeare |
'Bardolatry' vs the collaborative Shakespeare |
Week 10 |
Revenge and Race in the Renaissance: Othello, Shakespeare |
Othello |
Week 11 |
King Lear and the Matter of England |
Othello
|
Week 12 |
King Lear: Tragedy and Madness |
King Lear |
Week 13 |
Final essay writing strategies |
King Lear |
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Undergraduate students seeking more policy resources can visit the Student Policy Gateway (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/student-policy-gateway). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
If you would like to see all the policies relevant to Learning and Teaching visit Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central).
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/getting-started/student-conduct
Results shown in iLearn, or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our graduates will also be capable of creative thinking and of creating knowledge. They will be imaginative and open to experience and capable of innovation at work and in the community. We want them to be engaged in applying their critical, creative thinking.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to have emotional intelligence and sound interpersonal skills and to demonstrate discernment and common sense in their professional and personal judgement. They will exercise initiative as needed. They will be capable of risk assessment, and be able to handle ambiguity and complexity, enabling them to be adaptable in diverse and changing environments.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will have enquiring minds and a literate curiosity which will lead them to pursue knowledge for its own sake. They will continue to pursue learning in their careers and as they participate in the world. They will be capable of reflecting on their experiences and relationships with others and the environment, learning from them, and growing - personally, professionally and socially.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates will take with them the intellectual development, depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content in their chosen fields to make them competent and confident in their subject or profession. They will be able to demonstrate, where relevant, professional technical competence and meet professional standards. They will be able to articulate the structure of knowledge of their discipline, be able to adapt discipline-specific knowledge to novel situations, and be able to contribute from their discipline to inter-disciplinary solutions to problems.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want our graduates to be capable of reasoning, questioning and analysing, and to integrate and synthesise learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments; to be able to critique constraints, assumptions and limitations; to be able to think independently and systemically in relation to scholarly activity, in the workplace, and in the world. We want them to have a level of scientific and information technology literacy.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our graduates should be capable of researching; of analysing, and interpreting and assessing data and information in various forms; of drawing connections across fields of knowledge; and they should be able to relate their knowledge to complex situations at work or in the world, in order to diagnose and solve problems. We want them to have the confidence to take the initiative in doing so, within an awareness of their own limitations.
This graduate capability is supported by:
We want to develop in our students the ability to communicate and convey their views in forms effective with different audiences. We want our graduates to take with them the capability to read, listen, question, gather and evaluate information resources in a variety of formats, assess, write clearly, speak effectively, and to use visual communication and communication technologies as appropriate.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Changes from ENGL309 are as follows:
Some of the texts have been altered
The assessment tasks have been altered
A list of linkable secondary resources has been provided
Powerpoints for ENGL309 lectures will be made available on the iLearn site
University Grading Policy
http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/grading/policy.html
The grade a student receives will signify their overall performance in meeting the learning outcomes of a unit of study. Grades will not be awarded by reference to the achievement of other students nor allocated to fit a predetermined distribution. In determining a grade, due weight will be given to the learning outcomes and level of a unit (ie 100, 200, 300, 800 etc). Graded units will use the following grades:
HD High Distinction - 85-100
D Distinction - 75-84
Cr Credit - 65-74
P Pass - 50-64
F Fail - 0-49
Criterion |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
Relation-ship to topic or task |
Highly sophisticated demonstrated understand-ing of the task; excellent knowledge of implicit or embedded aspects; provides substantial number of additional insights |
Superior demonstrated understand-ing of the task; superior knowledge of implicit or embedded aspects; provides some additional insights |
Good Demonstra-ted understand-ing of the task; some knowledge of implicit or embedded aspects; may provide some additional insights |
Adequate demonstrated understand-ing of the task. Some understand-ing of relevant concepts but these may not be incorporated in a productive manner |
Does not demonstrate understand-ing of the task/topic or fundament-ally misinterp-rets what is being asked. |
Knowledge of literary/ critical concepts |
Highly sophisticated demonstrat-ed understand-ing of critical concepts and how these can be applied to texts. |
Superior demonstrated understand-ing of critical concepts and how these can be applied to texts. |
Good demonstrated understanding of critical concepts and how these can be applied to texts (provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of lecture/semin-ar content) |
Adequate demonstrated understanding of critical concepts and how these can be applied to texts (relevant concepts can be applied to texts in a basic manner) |
Does not Demonstrat-ed Understand-ing of critical concepts; fails to apply such concepts to texts |
Develop-ment of Indepen-dent critical argument |
Substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicat-ing a convincing critical argument |
Originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicat-ing a coherent critical argument |
Generates an adequate, critical argument that is supported by primary and secondary evidence. |
Minimal evidence of critical argument (argument is simplistic and underdevelop-ed |
Does not construct a coherent critical argument. |
Analysis of narrative strategies / literary technique/ theories |
Highly sophisticated and original analysis of narrative strategies/ literary technique/ theories |
Superior analysis of narrative strategies/ literary technique/ theories |
Some analysis of narrative strategies/ literary technique/ theories, but still reliant on plot/story elements for argument |
Limited analysis of narrative strategies/ literary technique/ theories and heavy reliance on plot/story elements for argument |
Failure to analyse narrative strategies/ literary technique/ theories. Total reliance on plot/story |
Selection and analysis of examples from text(s) |
Highly sophisticated selection and analysis of examples from texts |
Superior selection and analysis of examples from texts |
Effective selection and analysis of examples from texts – but some aspects problematic
|
Examples from text included but these examples not selected or analysed effectively |
Failure to analyse specific examples from the text; incorrect use of citations
|
Evidence of secondary research |
Sophisticated use of research to support and extend ideas |
Research clearly connected to ideas; citations correct |
Evidence of research used to support ideas, but research not always used effectively (e.g. citations substituted for original argument) |
Some research used but fails to support ideas |
Lack of appropriate research. |
Presentation (language and expression) |
Highly sophisticated and effective expression that is appropriate to the task. |
Superior expression that is appropriate to the task. |
Good expression. Some improvement needed in relation to expression of ideas and articulation of argument. |
Adequate use of language. Numerous mistakes in expression or grammar. |
Sub-standard use of language. Substantial mistakes in grammar and/or awkward expression. |
Selected linkable readings are listed in the unit handbook and will be available through the ENGL309 iLearn site. Students are encouraged to also use the large number of books available in the MQ Library, and to seek out other journal articles available via databases, to do further independent research.