Unit convenor and teaching staff |
Unit convenor and teaching staff
Project coordinator, Co-convenor
Matt Owers
Contact via email
By appointment
Project coordinator, Co-convenor
David Spence
|
---|---|
Credit points |
Credit points
4
|
Prerequisites |
Prerequisites
Admission to MRes
|
Corequisites |
Corequisites
|
Co-badged status |
Co-badged status
|
Unit description |
Unit description
This unit will provide students with a bespoke learning path to fully prepare them for entry into specific advanced subject units at 700 level offered by the Department of Physics and Astronomy. The program will draw on a mixture of existing lecture content and established teaching laboratories further enriched by individually guided study to provide a program tailored to the students' individual development needs.
|
Information about important academic dates including deadlines for withdrawing from units are available at https://www.mq.edu.au/study/calendar-of-dates
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Students will be assessed on a final written report consisting of four sections:
The report is expected to be no longer than 20 pages in length.
Students will hand in a draft of each section of the report at different stages throughout the semester, and receive detailed feedback.
Name | Weighting | Hurdle | Due |
---|---|---|---|
Literature review | 25% | No | Week 13 |
Introduction and theory | 25% | No | Week 13 |
Method, results and analysis | 40% | No | Week 13 |
Conclusions and outlook | 10% | No | Week 13 |
Due: Week 13
Weighting: 25%
Students will perform a limited literature review of the field of research, reviewing in detail approximately three key papers. In this section, students are expected to identify the overarching motivations for the field and the key current directions (e.g. what key challenges exist or are being addressed in recent years). This review should provide a clear context for the student’s research project. Finally, this section should articulate the aim of the project and how it is expected to advance the field (i.e. address one or more of the challenges identified above).
Approximately 3-4 pages. Draft due week 4.
Due: Week 13
Weighting: 25%
This section should briefly outline the approach of the project, including what techniques will be used, and then provide a detailed explanation of the principles of operation and theoretical underpinnings of one (or possibly two) key components of the research project.
Approximately 4-5 pages. Draft due week 6.
Due: Week 13
Weighting: 40%
Clearly and accurately describe the apparatus/tools/software used to collect or generate data. Present, analyse and explain your data, and any accompanying modelling or calculations, with appropriate use of texts, graphs, images, tables, etc. Present a coherent discussion/interpretation of the results that demonstrates a robust understanding of the physics involved, including a critical analysis of the quality of the data.
Approximately 5-8 pages. Draft due week 10.
Due: Week 13
Weighting: 10%
Articulate the outcome of the project with respect to the aim(s) identified at the end of the literature review. Identify the next steps (short term) for further advancing the field building on the results of the project. Identify and articulate how this project contributes to the long-term direction of the field.
Approximately 1-2 pages. Draft due week 11.
This unit focuses on learning advanced concepts and acquiring important generic and technical research skills within the context of a research project. Delivery of the unit is therefore primarily through a supervised research project and independent reading, with weekly meetings for discussion, feedback and guidance with the unit staff, and additional consultation as required. Projects are within an active research group in the department, and students will work closely with senior PhD students, postdocs and/or academics from that research group.
Projects will consist of fifteen days of work spread over the semester, e.g. a day per week for ten weeks with a one-week block during semester break. Timetabling of project days will be arranged between the student and the supervising research group.
Students will be provided with relevant reading material including scientific papers and text book chapters, and will also conduct literature searches to supplement their reading.
Regular meetings with the unit staff for progress updates, discussion of reading materials, theory, etc., will be arranged between the student and the unit staff.
15 days of project work, spread over the semester and arranged for mutually-agreeable days between students and project supervisors.
Weekly meetings with unit staff for discussion of project progress, theory, research context, experimental aspects, etc., starting from week 2.
Research papers, textbook chapters, or other reading material as advised by unit staff and project supervisors.
Part of the unit will involve online searching and accessing of current literature.
The unit will begin in week 2 with an introduction to the unit and the research projects available. By the end of week 2 students will be allocated to research projects, be introduced to supervisors, and be given initial reading material. Weekly research days (totalling 15) will be organised between the students and the supervising researchers, to be one day per week for most of the semester with a larger block timetabled in or around the mid-semester break. Weekly individual meetings with the unit staff will be arranged to start in week 3. Additional classes may be arranged where necessary to cover common topics or questions.
Draft sections of the written report are due in Week 4 (Literature review), Week 6 (Introduction and theory), Week 10 (Methods, results, analysis) and Week 11 (Conclusions, outlook, future work). Detailed feedback and guidance on each section will be provided by the unit staff in the following week.
Final report due in Week 13.
Macquarie University policies and procedures are accessible from Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central). Students should be aware of the following policies in particular with regard to Learning and Teaching:
Undergraduate students seeking more policy resources can visit the Student Policy Gateway (https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/student-policy-gateway). It is your one-stop-shop for the key policies you need to know about throughout your undergraduate student journey.
If you would like to see all the policies relevant to Learning and Teaching visit Policy Central (https://staff.mq.edu.au/work/strategy-planning-and-governance/university-policies-and-procedures/policy-central).
Macquarie University students have a responsibility to be familiar with the Student Code of Conduct: https://students.mq.edu.au/study/getting-started/student-conduct
Results published on platform other than eStudent, (eg. iLearn, Coursera etc.) or released directly by your Unit Convenor, are not confirmed as they are subject to final approval by the University. Once approved, final results will be sent to your student email address and will be made available in eStudent. For more information visit ask.mq.edu.au or if you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
Macquarie University provides a range of support services for students. For details, visit http://students.mq.edu.au/support/
Learning Skills (mq.edu.au/learningskills) provides academic writing resources and study strategies to improve your marks and take control of your study.
Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Service who can provide appropriate help with any issues that arise during their studies.
For all student enquiries, visit Student Connect at ask.mq.edu.au
If you are a Global MBA student contact globalmba.support@mq.edu.au
For help with University computer systems and technology, visit http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/information_technology/help/.
When using the University's IT, you must adhere to the Acceptable Use of IT Resources Policy. The policy applies to all who connect to the MQ network including students.
Our postgraduates will be able to demonstrate a significantly enhanced depth and breadth of knowledge, scholarly understanding, and specific subject content knowledge in their chosen fields.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of utilising and reflecting on prior knowledge and experience, of applying higher level critical thinking skills, and of integrating and synthesising learning and knowledge from a range of sources and environments. A characteristic of this form of thinking is the generation of new, professionally oriented knowledge through personal or group-based critique of practice and theory.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be capable of systematic enquiry; able to use research skills to create new knowledge that can be applied to real world issues, or contribute to a field of study or practice to enhance society. They will be capable of creative questioning, problem finding and problem solving.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be able to communicate effectively and convey their views to different social, cultural, and professional audiences. They will be able to use a variety of technologically supported media to communicate with empathy using a range of written, spoken or visual formats.
This graduate capability is supported by:
Our postgraduates will be ethically aware and capable of confident transformative action in relation to their professional responsibilities and the wider community. They will have a sense of connectedness with others and country and have a sense of mutual obligation. They will be able to appreciate the impact of their professional roles for social justice and inclusion related to national and global issues
This graduate capability is supported by:
This unit is a new trial offering. There will be few or no traditional lectures and no final exam. Instead the unit delivery is based primarily on individual supervised research projects with guided reading of theory and literature review related to the project. Assessment consists of a final written report (divided into four sections) covering theory, literature review and the research project.